比较面对面和大流行的在线 STEM 学习环境中自主支持、学习动机和学业成功之间的关系

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102469
Sanheeta Shankar, Kristy A. Robinson
{"title":"比较面对面和大流行的在线 STEM 学习环境中自主支持、学习动机和学业成功之间的关系","authors":"Sanheeta Shankar,&nbsp;Kristy A. Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic shift to emergency online learning likely shaped students' motivational beliefs and experiences of support. Documenting students' experiences across this transition holds promise for informing theoretical and practical understanding of the functioning and relations of key processes in various learning situations. Accordingly, we examined motivational beliefs, perceptions of motivational support, and outcomes across emergency online (2020) and pre-pandemic face-to-face (2019) contexts using data from two cohorts of undergraduate chemistry students (<em>N</em> = 2057). Students in face-to-face settings reported higher STEM career intentions, whereas students in pandemic online learning had higher grades and perceptions of autonomy support. Means of motivation variables did not differ across settings, but attainment value more strongly predicted STEM career intentions in pandemic online settings. The significance of the relationship between self-efficacy and outcomes also varied across contexts. These findings deepen theoretical and practical understanding of how learning environments and the pandemic shape motivational experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><p>Contemporary research highlights the significance of students' perceived support and context in shaping motivation, but the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students' motivational beliefs and achievements remains uncertain. Our study compared motivation, support, grades, and career intentions between face-to-face and online settings during the pandemic, revealing surprising findings. Students perceived emergency remote instruction in 2020 as more autonomy supportive, suggesting the value of flexibility in traditional learning environments. The results underscore the importance of promoting STEM identity and offering career-related opportunities in online learning to boost achievement and STEM career aspirations. This study contributes to understanding the effects of pandemic instruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing relations among autonomy support, motivation, and academic success across face-to-face and pandemic online STEM learning environments\",\"authors\":\"Sanheeta Shankar,&nbsp;Kristy A. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic shift to emergency online learning likely shaped students' motivational beliefs and experiences of support. Documenting students' experiences across this transition holds promise for informing theoretical and practical understanding of the functioning and relations of key processes in various learning situations. Accordingly, we examined motivational beliefs, perceptions of motivational support, and outcomes across emergency online (2020) and pre-pandemic face-to-face (2019) contexts using data from two cohorts of undergraduate chemistry students (<em>N</em> = 2057). Students in face-to-face settings reported higher STEM career intentions, whereas students in pandemic online learning had higher grades and perceptions of autonomy support. Means of motivation variables did not differ across settings, but attainment value more strongly predicted STEM career intentions in pandemic online settings. The significance of the relationship between self-efficacy and outcomes also varied across contexts. These findings deepen theoretical and practical understanding of how learning environments and the pandemic shape motivational experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><p>Contemporary research highlights the significance of students' perceived support and context in shaping motivation, but the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students' motivational beliefs and achievements remains uncertain. Our study compared motivation, support, grades, and career intentions between face-to-face and online settings during the pandemic, revealing surprising findings. Students perceived emergency remote instruction in 2020 as more autonomy supportive, suggesting the value of flexibility in traditional learning environments. The results underscore the importance of promoting STEM identity and offering career-related opportunities in online learning to boost achievement and STEM career aspirations. This study contributes to understanding the effects of pandemic instruction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000621\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000621","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行病向紧急在线学习的转变可能会影响学生的动机信念和支持体验。记录学生在这一转变过程中的经历,有助于从理论和实践上理解各种学习情境中关键过程的功能和关系。因此,我们利用两批化学本科生(N = 2057)的数据,研究了紧急在线(2020 年)和大流行前的面授(2019 年)背景下的动机信念、动机支持感知和结果。面授环境下的学生报告了更高的 STEM 职业意向,而大流行在线学习环境下的学生成绩更高,对自主支持的感知也更高。动机变量的平均值在不同环境下没有差异,但在大流行的在线环境下,成就价值对STEM职业意向的预测作用更强。自我效能感与结果之间关系的重要性也因环境而异。这些发现加深了人们对学习环境和大流行病如何塑造学习动机体验的理论和实践理解。我们的研究比较了大流行期间面对面和在线环境下的学习动机、支持、成绩和职业意向,发现了令人惊讶的结果。学生们认为 2020 年的紧急远程教学更有利于自主,这表明了传统学习环境中灵活性的价值。研究结果强调了在在线学习中促进 STEM 特性并提供与职业相关的机会以提高成绩和 STEM 职业理想的重要性。本研究有助于了解大流行病教学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing relations among autonomy support, motivation, and academic success across face-to-face and pandemic online STEM learning environments

The COVID-19 pandemic shift to emergency online learning likely shaped students' motivational beliefs and experiences of support. Documenting students' experiences across this transition holds promise for informing theoretical and practical understanding of the functioning and relations of key processes in various learning situations. Accordingly, we examined motivational beliefs, perceptions of motivational support, and outcomes across emergency online (2020) and pre-pandemic face-to-face (2019) contexts using data from two cohorts of undergraduate chemistry students (N = 2057). Students in face-to-face settings reported higher STEM career intentions, whereas students in pandemic online learning had higher grades and perceptions of autonomy support. Means of motivation variables did not differ across settings, but attainment value more strongly predicted STEM career intentions in pandemic online settings. The significance of the relationship between self-efficacy and outcomes also varied across contexts. These findings deepen theoretical and practical understanding of how learning environments and the pandemic shape motivational experiences.

Educational relevance and implications statement

Contemporary research highlights the significance of students' perceived support and context in shaping motivation, but the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students' motivational beliefs and achievements remains uncertain. Our study compared motivation, support, grades, and career intentions between face-to-face and online settings during the pandemic, revealing surprising findings. Students perceived emergency remote instruction in 2020 as more autonomy supportive, suggesting the value of flexibility in traditional learning environments. The results underscore the importance of promoting STEM identity and offering career-related opportunities in online learning to boost achievement and STEM career aspirations. This study contributes to understanding the effects of pandemic instruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
The structure of adult thinking: A network approach to (meta)cognitive processing Ink and pixels: Impact of highlighting and reading self-efficacy on adolescents' cognitive load, epistemic emotions, and text comprehension Students' study activities before and after exam deadlines as predictors of performance in STEM courses: A multi-source data analysis The relationship between positive and painful emotions and cognitive load during an algebra learning task Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1