Annika Lonkila , Jani P. Lukkarinen , Laura van Oers , Giuseppe Feola , Minna Kaljonen
{"title":"公正地破坏稳定?考虑淘汰泥炭的公正性","authors":"Annika Lonkila , Jani P. Lukkarinen , Laura van Oers , Giuseppe Feola , Minna Kaljonen","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The deliberate destabilisation of regimes has gained attention in sustainability transitions scholarship regarding the urgency of transitions. However, there has been little focus on justice in deliberate destabilisation literature<em>.</em> Without attention to justice, destabilisation policies can cause unforeseen negative social, economic, or environmental impacts. Justice has mainly been explored in terms of compensating losses for regime actors, local communities, and industry workers, which may overlook broader justice concerns. We propose a framework for just destabilisation that acknowledges not only the distribution of gains and losses, but also the recognitional and procedural justice concerns inherent in destabilisation. Our analysis of the destabilisation of peat in the energy and agricultural sectors in Finland suggests four main implications for research, paying attention to the spatial nestedness of deliberate destabilisation; diversifying the understanding of incumbency; moving beyond compensations; and finally, attending to existing structural injustices to account for restorative justice in deliberate destabilisation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100867"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424000583/pdfft?md5=c227d60964a8f7a012982be9d7203951&pid=1-s2.0-S2210422424000583-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Just destabilisation? Considering justice in the phase-out of peat\",\"authors\":\"Annika Lonkila , Jani P. Lukkarinen , Laura van Oers , Giuseppe Feola , Minna Kaljonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The deliberate destabilisation of regimes has gained attention in sustainability transitions scholarship regarding the urgency of transitions. However, there has been little focus on justice in deliberate destabilisation literature<em>.</em> Without attention to justice, destabilisation policies can cause unforeseen negative social, economic, or environmental impacts. Justice has mainly been explored in terms of compensating losses for regime actors, local communities, and industry workers, which may overlook broader justice concerns. We propose a framework for just destabilisation that acknowledges not only the distribution of gains and losses, but also the recognitional and procedural justice concerns inherent in destabilisation. Our analysis of the destabilisation of peat in the energy and agricultural sectors in Finland suggests four main implications for research, paying attention to the spatial nestedness of deliberate destabilisation; diversifying the understanding of incumbency; moving beyond compensations; and finally, attending to existing structural injustices to account for restorative justice in deliberate destabilisation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424000583/pdfft?md5=c227d60964a8f7a012982be9d7203951&pid=1-s2.0-S2210422424000583-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424000583\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422424000583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Just destabilisation? Considering justice in the phase-out of peat
The deliberate destabilisation of regimes has gained attention in sustainability transitions scholarship regarding the urgency of transitions. However, there has been little focus on justice in deliberate destabilisation literature. Without attention to justice, destabilisation policies can cause unforeseen negative social, economic, or environmental impacts. Justice has mainly been explored in terms of compensating losses for regime actors, local communities, and industry workers, which may overlook broader justice concerns. We propose a framework for just destabilisation that acknowledges not only the distribution of gains and losses, but also the recognitional and procedural justice concerns inherent in destabilisation. Our analysis of the destabilisation of peat in the energy and agricultural sectors in Finland suggests four main implications for research, paying attention to the spatial nestedness of deliberate destabilisation; diversifying the understanding of incumbency; moving beyond compensations; and finally, attending to existing structural injustices to account for restorative justice in deliberate destabilisation.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.