数据时代。理论思维、统计思维

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE NEOHELICON Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1007/s11059-024-00743-y
Alexandre Gefen
{"title":"数据时代。理论思维、统计思维","authors":"Alexandre Gefen","doi":"10.1007/s11059-024-00743-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contemporary experiments in Digital Humanities and distant reading tend to propose an empirical approach to literary facts. This development leads us to reflect on the place of quantitative analysis in literary theory, by asking whether data can replace literary theory in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI)? By shifting from the status of emblematic fact to that of mere “noise” or statistical randomness in data, it is the entire theoretical conception of the literary work, supposedly individual and particular, that is called into question. This article attempts to reflect on these epistemological evolutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54002,"journal":{"name":"NEOHELICON","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The time of data. theoretical thinking, statistical thinking\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Gefen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11059-024-00743-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Contemporary experiments in Digital Humanities and distant reading tend to propose an empirical approach to literary facts. This development leads us to reflect on the place of quantitative analysis in literary theory, by asking whether data can replace literary theory in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI)? By shifting from the status of emblematic fact to that of mere “noise” or statistical randomness in data, it is the entire theoretical conception of the literary work, supposedly individual and particular, that is called into question. This article attempts to reflect on these epistemological evolutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEOHELICON\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEOHELICON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-024-00743-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEOHELICON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-024-00743-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字人文和远距离阅读的当代实验倾向于提出一种实证的文学事实方法。这一发展促使我们反思定量分析在文学理论中的地位,追问在人工智能(AI)时代,数据能否取代文学理论?通过从象征性事实的地位转向仅仅是数据中的 "噪音 "或统计随机性的地位,文学作品的整个理论概念,即所谓的个体性和特殊性,受到了质疑。本文试图对这些认识论的演变进行反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The time of data. theoretical thinking, statistical thinking

Contemporary experiments in Digital Humanities and distant reading tend to propose an empirical approach to literary facts. This development leads us to reflect on the place of quantitative analysis in literary theory, by asking whether data can replace literary theory in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI)? By shifting from the status of emblematic fact to that of mere “noise” or statistical randomness in data, it is the entire theoretical conception of the literary work, supposedly individual and particular, that is called into question. This article attempts to reflect on these epistemological evolutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEOHELICON
NEOHELICON LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Neohelicon welcomes studies on all aspects of comparative and world literature, critical theory and practice.  In the discussion of literary historical topics (including literary movements, epochs, or regions), analytical contributions based on a solidly-anchored methodology are preferred.
期刊最新文献
Future present: cli-fi’s representational challenge Representing stream of consciousness in comics: definition and categorization Electronic literary creation: dialogues through cultural recycling The time of data. theoretical thinking, statistical thinking Past present: Coal and Hard Times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1