开发自杀意念的微妙筛查:心理测量特征及对家庭治疗师的启示

IF 1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1007/s10591-024-09705-z
Kyle D. Killian
{"title":"开发自杀意念的微妙筛查:心理测量特征及对家庭治疗师的启示","authors":"Kyle D. Killian","doi":"10.1007/s10591-024-09705-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While 10 million U.S. adults experience suicidal thoughts and 1.7 million attempt suicide annually, candid, truthful endorsement of assessment items related to suicidal ideation (SI) can be inhibited by stigma, shame, and embarrassment and a fear of involuntary hospitalization. Suicidal ideation in, and suicide attempts by, family members increase the suicide risk among other members by several times, and so accurate detection of SI is crucial for couple and family therapists. To address concerns about stigma and false negatives in screening for SI, a 19-item <i>subtle</i> screening of suicidal ideation (SSSI) was developed from a pool of 32 “proxy” items tapping psychological pain, emotional intelligence, and negative alterations in mood and cognitions. A demographics form, a measure of suicidal ideation, measures of anxiety, depression, and traumatic stress, and versions of the Beck Hopelessness Scale and the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire were also used for data collection. Principal components analysis and reliability, correlation, and multiple regression procedures on data from a non-random, diverse sample of adults (<i>N</i> = 306) provided evidence of excellent reliability (α = .93) and convergent and discriminant validity for the SSSI. The three-dimensional SSSI accounted for 54.9% of the variance in a direct measure of suicidal thoughts, and a Receiver Operator Characteristic curve identified a cut-off score of 35 with a sensitivity of .937 and specificity of .81, indicating the instrument successfully identifies those with and without suicidal thoughts. Clinical implications and future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51600,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Subtle Screening for Suicidal Ideation: Psychometric Characteristics and Implications for Family Therapists\",\"authors\":\"Kyle D. Killian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10591-024-09705-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While 10 million U.S. adults experience suicidal thoughts and 1.7 million attempt suicide annually, candid, truthful endorsement of assessment items related to suicidal ideation (SI) can be inhibited by stigma, shame, and embarrassment and a fear of involuntary hospitalization. Suicidal ideation in, and suicide attempts by, family members increase the suicide risk among other members by several times, and so accurate detection of SI is crucial for couple and family therapists. To address concerns about stigma and false negatives in screening for SI, a 19-item <i>subtle</i> screening of suicidal ideation (SSSI) was developed from a pool of 32 “proxy” items tapping psychological pain, emotional intelligence, and negative alterations in mood and cognitions. A demographics form, a measure of suicidal ideation, measures of anxiety, depression, and traumatic stress, and versions of the Beck Hopelessness Scale and the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire were also used for data collection. Principal components analysis and reliability, correlation, and multiple regression procedures on data from a non-random, diverse sample of adults (<i>N</i> = 306) provided evidence of excellent reliability (α = .93) and convergent and discriminant validity for the SSSI. The three-dimensional SSSI accounted for 54.9% of the variance in a direct measure of suicidal thoughts, and a Receiver Operator Characteristic curve identified a cut-off score of 35 with a sensitivity of .937 and specificity of .81, indicating the instrument successfully identifies those with and without suicidal thoughts. Clinical implications and future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-024-09705-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-024-09705-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然每年有 1000 万美国成年人有自杀倾向,170 万人试图自杀,但由于耻辱、羞愧、尴尬以及对非自愿住院治疗的恐惧,人们可能无法坦率、真实地认可与自杀倾向(SI)相关的评估项目。家庭成员的自杀意念和自杀企图会使其他成员的自杀风险增加数倍,因此准确检测 SI 对夫妻和家庭治疗师来说至关重要。为了解决在筛查 SI 过程中出现的耻辱感和假阴性的问题,我们从 32 个 "替代 "项目中开发出了一个包含 19 个项目的自杀意念微妙筛查(SSSI),这些 "替代 "项目可反映心理痛苦、情绪智力以及情绪和认知的负面变化。数据收集还使用了人口统计学表格、自杀意念测量表、焦虑、抑郁和创伤压力测量表以及贝克无望量表和人际需求问卷。对来自非随机、多样化成人样本(N = 306)的数据进行主成分分析和可靠性、相关性和多元回归程序,证明 SSSI 具有极佳的可靠性(α = .93)以及收敛性和区分性有效性。在对自杀想法的直接测量中,三维 SSSI 占据了 54.9% 的方差,接收者特征曲线确定了 35 分的临界值,灵敏度为 0.937,特异度为 0.81,表明该工具能成功识别有自杀想法和无自杀想法的人。本文对临床意义和未来研究进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a Subtle Screening for Suicidal Ideation: Psychometric Characteristics and Implications for Family Therapists

While 10 million U.S. adults experience suicidal thoughts and 1.7 million attempt suicide annually, candid, truthful endorsement of assessment items related to suicidal ideation (SI) can be inhibited by stigma, shame, and embarrassment and a fear of involuntary hospitalization. Suicidal ideation in, and suicide attempts by, family members increase the suicide risk among other members by several times, and so accurate detection of SI is crucial for couple and family therapists. To address concerns about stigma and false negatives in screening for SI, a 19-item subtle screening of suicidal ideation (SSSI) was developed from a pool of 32 “proxy” items tapping psychological pain, emotional intelligence, and negative alterations in mood and cognitions. A demographics form, a measure of suicidal ideation, measures of anxiety, depression, and traumatic stress, and versions of the Beck Hopelessness Scale and the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire were also used for data collection. Principal components analysis and reliability, correlation, and multiple regression procedures on data from a non-random, diverse sample of adults (N = 306) provided evidence of excellent reliability (α = .93) and convergent and discriminant validity for the SSSI. The three-dimensional SSSI accounted for 54.9% of the variance in a direct measure of suicidal thoughts, and a Receiver Operator Characteristic curve identified a cut-off score of 35 with a sensitivity of .937 and specificity of .81, indicating the instrument successfully identifies those with and without suicidal thoughts. Clinical implications and future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY
CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal (COFT) is is a quarterly, peer-reviewed publication that presents the latest developments in research, practice, theory, and training in couple and family therapy. COFT publishes applied and basic research with implications for systemic theory, treatment, and policy. COFT appreciates a multidisciplinary approach, and welcomes manuscripts which address processes and outcomes in systemic treatment across modalities and within broader social contexts. The journal’s content is relevant to systemic therapy practitioners and researchers, as well as marriage and family therapists, family psychologists, clinical social workers, and social policy specialists.
期刊最新文献
Family Members’ Reward-Based Activation in Response to an AUD Love-One Clinical Work with Female Torture Survivors: An Exploration of Service Providers’ Views Towards Culturally Sensitive Care: Addressing Challenges in Asian and Asian American Mental Health Services Black Girl Magic: Strength, Resiliency, and Suffering? A Qualitative Exploration of Toxic Black Femininity and Intimate Partner Violence Surface of Marital Harmony: Insights into Attachment Similarity Using Dyadic Response Surface Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1