消费者如何评估复杂服务的成本:共同基金费用案例

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS European Journal of Marketing Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1108/ejm-06-2021-0466
Jonas Nilsson, Jeanette Carlsson Hauff, Anders Carlander
{"title":"消费者如何评估复杂服务的成本:共同基金费用案例","authors":"Jonas Nilsson, Jeanette Carlsson Hauff, Anders Carlander","doi":"10.1108/ejm-06-2021-0466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>In modern societies, consumer well-being is dependent on choices regarding complex services, such as investments, health care, insurance and lending. However, evaluating costs of such services is often difficult for consumers due to a combination of limited cognitive resources and complexity of the service. The purpose of this study is to empirically examine to what extent three specific consequences of complexity influence consumer tendencies to make mistakes when evaluating the costs (or price) of complex services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Three studies were conducted (survey: <em>n</em> = 153, experiment: <em>n</em> = 332 and conjoint analysis: <em>n</em> = 225), all focusing on how consumers evaluate costs in the complex mutual fund setting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors find that consumers struggle with estimating and using cost information in decision-making in the complex services setting. Consumers of complex services frequently underestimate the costs over the long-term, may see costs as a signal of service quality and are susceptible to influence from presentation formats when evaluating costs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study investigates mutual funds, which is one example of a complex service. In order to get a full picture of how consumers deal with costs in complex setting, future research needs to expand this focus to other types of complex services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The results have implications for both marketers of complex services and policymakers. For marketers, this paper highlights that competing with a low-cost strategy may be difficult in the complex services setting as consumers may lack the ability to actually evaluate what they pay over the long term. For policymakers, increased simplification of prices may be an attractive option. However, it is important that this simplification is done in a way that increases the possibility to compare prices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>As complexity influences several aspects of decision-making, an understanding of how consumers evaluate costs in complex settings is dependent on taking a multidimensional research approach. This paper makes a novel contribution to the literature on pricing by showing that consumers struggle with multiple aspects when evaluating costs in complex contexts. Understanding these effects is important to policy, as well as to research on the cognitive value of simplicity that is currently gaining traction in marketing research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48401,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How consumers evaluate costs in complex services: the case of mutual fund fees\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Nilsson, Jeanette Carlsson Hauff, Anders Carlander\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ejm-06-2021-0466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>In modern societies, consumer well-being is dependent on choices regarding complex services, such as investments, health care, insurance and lending. However, evaluating costs of such services is often difficult for consumers due to a combination of limited cognitive resources and complexity of the service. The purpose of this study is to empirically examine to what extent three specific consequences of complexity influence consumer tendencies to make mistakes when evaluating the costs (or price) of complex services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Three studies were conducted (survey: <em>n</em> = 153, experiment: <em>n</em> = 332 and conjoint analysis: <em>n</em> = 225), all focusing on how consumers evaluate costs in the complex mutual fund setting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The authors find that consumers struggle with estimating and using cost information in decision-making in the complex services setting. Consumers of complex services frequently underestimate the costs over the long-term, may see costs as a signal of service quality and are susceptible to influence from presentation formats when evaluating costs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The study investigates mutual funds, which is one example of a complex service. In order to get a full picture of how consumers deal with costs in complex setting, future research needs to expand this focus to other types of complex services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The results have implications for both marketers of complex services and policymakers. For marketers, this paper highlights that competing with a low-cost strategy may be difficult in the complex services setting as consumers may lack the ability to actually evaluate what they pay over the long term. For policymakers, increased simplification of prices may be an attractive option. However, it is important that this simplification is done in a way that increases the possibility to compare prices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>As complexity influences several aspects of decision-making, an understanding of how consumers evaluate costs in complex settings is dependent on taking a multidimensional research approach. This paper makes a novel contribution to the literature on pricing by showing that consumers struggle with multiple aspects when evaluating costs in complex contexts. Understanding these effects is important to policy, as well as to research on the cognitive value of simplicity that is currently gaining traction in marketing research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-06-2021-0466\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-06-2021-0466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在现代社会中,消费者的福祉取决于对投资、医疗保健、保险和借贷等复杂服务的选择。然而,由于认知资源有限和服务的复杂性,消费者往往难以评估此类服务的成本。本研究的目的是通过实证研究,探讨复杂性的三个具体后果在多大程度上影响了消费者在评估复杂服务的成本(或价格)时犯错误的倾向。研究结果作者发现,在复杂服务的决策过程中,消费者在估算和使用成本信息方面存在困难。复杂服务的消费者经常低估长期成本,可能将成本视为服务质量的信号,并且在评估成本时容易受到介绍形式的影响。为了全面了解消费者在复杂环境中如何处理成本,未来的研究需要将重点扩展到其他类型的复杂服务。对于营销人员来说,本文强调了在复杂的服务环境中与低成本战略竞争可能会很困难,因为消费者可能缺乏对他们长期支付的费用进行实际评估的能力。对于政策制定者来说,进一步简化价格可能是一个有吸引力的选择。原创性/价值 由于复杂性会影响决策的多个方面,因此要了解消费者如何在复杂环境中评估成本,就必须采取多维度的研究方法。本文通过展示消费者在复杂环境中评估成本时在多个方面的挣扎,为定价方面的文献做出了新的贡献。了解这些影响对政策以及目前在市场营销研究中日益流行的对简单性认知价值的研究都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How consumers evaluate costs in complex services: the case of mutual fund fees

Purpose

In modern societies, consumer well-being is dependent on choices regarding complex services, such as investments, health care, insurance and lending. However, evaluating costs of such services is often difficult for consumers due to a combination of limited cognitive resources and complexity of the service. The purpose of this study is to empirically examine to what extent three specific consequences of complexity influence consumer tendencies to make mistakes when evaluating the costs (or price) of complex services.

Design/methodology/approach

Three studies were conducted (survey: n = 153, experiment: n = 332 and conjoint analysis: n = 225), all focusing on how consumers evaluate costs in the complex mutual fund setting.

Findings

The authors find that consumers struggle with estimating and using cost information in decision-making in the complex services setting. Consumers of complex services frequently underestimate the costs over the long-term, may see costs as a signal of service quality and are susceptible to influence from presentation formats when evaluating costs.

Research limitations/implications

The study investigates mutual funds, which is one example of a complex service. In order to get a full picture of how consumers deal with costs in complex setting, future research needs to expand this focus to other types of complex services.

Practical implications

The results have implications for both marketers of complex services and policymakers. For marketers, this paper highlights that competing with a low-cost strategy may be difficult in the complex services setting as consumers may lack the ability to actually evaluate what they pay over the long term. For policymakers, increased simplification of prices may be an attractive option. However, it is important that this simplification is done in a way that increases the possibility to compare prices.

Originality/value

As complexity influences several aspects of decision-making, an understanding of how consumers evaluate costs in complex settings is dependent on taking a multidimensional research approach. This paper makes a novel contribution to the literature on pricing by showing that consumers struggle with multiple aspects when evaluating costs in complex contexts. Understanding these effects is important to policy, as well as to research on the cognitive value of simplicity that is currently gaining traction in marketing research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: The EJM is receptive to all areas of research which are relevant to marketing academic research, some examples are: ■Sustainability and ethical issues in marketing ■Consumer behaviour ■Advertising and branding issues ■Sales management and personal selling ■Methodology and metatheory of marketing research ■International and export marketing ■Services marketing ■New product development and innovation ■Retailing and distribution ■Macromarketing and societal issues ■Pricing and economic decision making in marketing ■Marketing models
期刊最新文献
Refocusing marketing effort to support net-positive social impact Naming product colors by consumption situations as advertising appeals: effects and the underlying mechanism Applying the theory of consumption values to representational and nonrepresentational images in marketing: propositions and research directions A second life for second-hand products: the role of anthropomorphism and taboo trade-offs Strategizing green marketing in times of uncertainty: does it pay off?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1