COVID-19 期间养老机构面临的伦理挑战:领导者的视角。

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1177/09697330241255934
Anna-Carin Karlsson, Anna-Karin Edberg, Malin Sundström, Annica Backman
{"title":"COVID-19 期间养老机构面临的伦理挑战:领导者的视角。","authors":"Anna-Carin Karlsson, Anna-Karin Edberg, Malin Sundström, Annica Backman","doi":"10.1177/09697330241255934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person-centred care is based on ethical principles, and it is regarded as high-quality care. Care of older persons should embrace person-centredness. During the pandemic, older persons were highlighted as a vulnerable group at risk of developing serious illness and/or suffering death from COVID-19. Several pandemic-related measures were introduced in residential care facilities (RCFs) to reduce this risk, which influenced the possibilities to lead and provide a person-centred care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study's aim was to explore ethical challenges in relation to person-centredness during the COVID-19 pandemic, from the perspective of leaders in RCFs.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>The study had a qualitative descriptive design.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 leaders working in RCFs in Sweden. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The participants received oral and written information about the study and gave written consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The overarching ethical challenge was <i>Having to disregard the individual needs of the person in order to protect the group and society</i>. This included (a) Protecting the group versus promoting the older person's autonomy; (b) Being forced to lead care based on uncertainty instead of evidence; (c) Striving to provide dignified care but lacking opportunities; and (d) Going far beyond ordinary duty and endangering one's own and the staff's health.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The ethical challenges meant being torn between the person's individual needs and protecting the group and society, with clashing ethical principles as a consequence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The leaders faced ethical situations resulting in undignified and compromised person-centred care, which has implications for stakeholders and management who need to address the work conditions in RCFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1661-1673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical challenges in residential care facilities during COVID-19: Leaders' perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Anna-Carin Karlsson, Anna-Karin Edberg, Malin Sundström, Annica Backman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330241255934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person-centred care is based on ethical principles, and it is regarded as high-quality care. Care of older persons should embrace person-centredness. During the pandemic, older persons were highlighted as a vulnerable group at risk of developing serious illness and/or suffering death from COVID-19. Several pandemic-related measures were introduced in residential care facilities (RCFs) to reduce this risk, which influenced the possibilities to lead and provide a person-centred care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study's aim was to explore ethical challenges in relation to person-centredness during the COVID-19 pandemic, from the perspective of leaders in RCFs.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>The study had a qualitative descriptive design.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 leaders working in RCFs in Sweden. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The participants received oral and written information about the study and gave written consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The overarching ethical challenge was <i>Having to disregard the individual needs of the person in order to protect the group and society</i>. This included (a) Protecting the group versus promoting the older person's autonomy; (b) Being forced to lead care based on uncertainty instead of evidence; (c) Striving to provide dignified care but lacking opportunities; and (d) Going far beyond ordinary duty and endangering one's own and the staff's health.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The ethical challenges meant being torn between the person's individual needs and protecting the group and society, with clashing ethical principles as a consequence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The leaders faced ethical situations resulting in undignified and compromised person-centred care, which has implications for stakeholders and management who need to address the work conditions in RCFs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1661-1673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241255934\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241255934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以人为本的护理以道德原则为基础,被视为高质量的护理。对老年人的护理应当以人为本。在流感大流行期间,老年人被强调为易受 COVID-19 病毒感染而罹患重病和/或死亡的弱势群体。目的:本研究旨在从养老机构领导者的角度,探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间与以人为本相关的伦理挑战:研究设计:本研究采用定性描述设计:对瑞典 26 名在康复中心工作的领导者进行了半结构化访谈。采用传统的内容分析法对数据进行分析:本研究获得了瑞典伦理审查机构的批准。参与者收到了有关本研究的口头和书面信息,并出具了书面同意书。研究按照《赫尔辛基宣言》进行:首要的伦理挑战是,为了保护群体和社会,不得不忽视个人的需要。这包括:(a) 保护群体与促进老年人的自主权;(b) 被迫根据不确定性而不是证据来提供护理;(c) 努力提供有尊严的护理,但缺乏机会;(d) 远远超出普通职责,危及自己和工作人员的健康:讨论:伦理挑战意味着在个人需求与保护群体和社会之间纠结,伦理原则因此而发生冲突:领导者面临的伦理问题导致以人为本的护理不体面和受损,这对利益相关者和管理层都有影响,他们需要解决康复中心的工作条件问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical challenges in residential care facilities during COVID-19: Leaders' perspective.

Background: Person-centred care is based on ethical principles, and it is regarded as high-quality care. Care of older persons should embrace person-centredness. During the pandemic, older persons were highlighted as a vulnerable group at risk of developing serious illness and/or suffering death from COVID-19. Several pandemic-related measures were introduced in residential care facilities (RCFs) to reduce this risk, which influenced the possibilities to lead and provide a person-centred care.

Aim: This study's aim was to explore ethical challenges in relation to person-centredness during the COVID-19 pandemic, from the perspective of leaders in RCFs.

Research design: The study had a qualitative descriptive design.

Participants and research context: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 leaders working in RCFs in Sweden. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis.

Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The participants received oral and written information about the study and gave written consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Findings: The overarching ethical challenge was Having to disregard the individual needs of the person in order to protect the group and society. This included (a) Protecting the group versus promoting the older person's autonomy; (b) Being forced to lead care based on uncertainty instead of evidence; (c) Striving to provide dignified care but lacking opportunities; and (d) Going far beyond ordinary duty and endangering one's own and the staff's health.

Discussion: The ethical challenges meant being torn between the person's individual needs and protecting the group and society, with clashing ethical principles as a consequence.

Conclusions: The leaders faced ethical situations resulting in undignified and compromised person-centred care, which has implications for stakeholders and management who need to address the work conditions in RCFs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
期刊最新文献
Sources of moral distress in nursing professionals: A scoping review. Truth-telling, and ethical considerations in terminal care: an Eastern perspective. Ethical considerations in the UK-Nepal nurse recruitment: Nepali nurses' perspectives. Nurses on the outside, problems on the inside! The duty of nurses to support unions. Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1