Megan Smith MD, MPH, Kerry A. Tepe BS, Hadley Sauers-Ford MPH, Denise Atarama RD, Monique Gilliam BA, Ndidi Unaka MD, MEd, Andrew F. Beck MD, MPH, Anita N. Shah MD, MPH, Amanda C. Schondelmeyer MD, MSc, Katherine A. Auger MD, MSc
{"title":"解决住院病人的食物不安全问题:出院后试点研究结果。","authors":"Megan Smith MD, MPH, Kerry A. Tepe BS, Hadley Sauers-Ford MPH, Denise Atarama RD, Monique Gilliam BA, Ndidi Unaka MD, MEd, Andrew F. Beck MD, MPH, Anita N. Shah MD, MPH, Amanda C. Schondelmeyer MD, MSc, Katherine A. Auger MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>With a growing interest in screening for food insecurity (FI) during pediatric hospitalization, there is a parallel need to develop interventions. With input from caregivers experiencing FI, we sought to identify interventions to assist with short-term FI after discharge and evaluate their feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We first employed qualitative methods to identify potential interventions. Next, we conducted a pilot study of selected interventions for families experiencing FI. Seven days postdischarge, caregivers rated the intervention's feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. We also assessed for ongoing FI. We summarized the median and proportion of “completely agree” responses to feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness questions, and we compared in-hospital and postdischarge FI using McNemar's test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the qualitative stage, 14 caregivers prioritized three interventions: grocery store gift cards, grocery delivery/pick-up, and frozen meals. In the pilot study, 53 caregivers (25% of those screened) endorsed FI during their child's hospitalization and received one or more of the interventions. Every caregiver selected the grocery gift card option; 37 families (69.8%) also received frozen meals. Seven days after discharge, most caregivers rated the intervention as “completely” feasible (76%), acceptable (90%), and appropriate (88%). There was a significant decrease in caregivers who reported FI after discharge compared to during the hospitalization (<i>p</i> < .001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of inpatient interventions to address FI, particularly at the time of pediatric hospital discharge and transition home. Randomized trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of interventions employed during hospitalization.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"19 11","pages":"993-1000"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing food insecurity in the inpatient setting: Results of a postdischarge pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Megan Smith MD, MPH, Kerry A. Tepe BS, Hadley Sauers-Ford MPH, Denise Atarama RD, Monique Gilliam BA, Ndidi Unaka MD, MEd, Andrew F. Beck MD, MPH, Anita N. Shah MD, MPH, Amanda C. Schondelmeyer MD, MSc, Katherine A. Auger MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.13421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>With a growing interest in screening for food insecurity (FI) during pediatric hospitalization, there is a parallel need to develop interventions. With input from caregivers experiencing FI, we sought to identify interventions to assist with short-term FI after discharge and evaluate their feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We first employed qualitative methods to identify potential interventions. Next, we conducted a pilot study of selected interventions for families experiencing FI. Seven days postdischarge, caregivers rated the intervention's feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. We also assessed for ongoing FI. We summarized the median and proportion of “completely agree” responses to feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness questions, and we compared in-hospital and postdischarge FI using McNemar's test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the qualitative stage, 14 caregivers prioritized three interventions: grocery store gift cards, grocery delivery/pick-up, and frozen meals. In the pilot study, 53 caregivers (25% of those screened) endorsed FI during their child's hospitalization and received one or more of the interventions. Every caregiver selected the grocery gift card option; 37 families (69.8%) also received frozen meals. Seven days after discharge, most caregivers rated the intervention as “completely” feasible (76%), acceptable (90%), and appropriate (88%). There was a significant decrease in caregivers who reported FI after discharge compared to during the hospitalization (<i>p</i> < .001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study demonstrates the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of inpatient interventions to address FI, particularly at the time of pediatric hospital discharge and transition home. Randomized trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of interventions employed during hospitalization.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 11\",\"pages\":\"993-1000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13421\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:随着人们对儿科住院期间食物不安全(FI)筛查的兴趣与日俱增,同时也需要制定干预措施。根据经历过食物不安全的护理人员提供的信息,我们试图确定出院后协助短期食物不安全的干预措施,并评估其可行性、可接受性和适当性:我们首先采用定性方法来确定潜在的干预措施。接下来,我们对选定的干预措施进行了试点研究。出院七天后,护理人员对干预措施的可行性、可接受性和适当性进行评分。我们还对持续的 FI 进行了评估。我们总结了对可行性、可接受性和适当性问题的 "完全同意 "回答的中位数和比例,并使用 McNemar 检验比较了院内和出院后的 FI:在定性阶段,14 名护理人员优先选择了三种干预措施:杂货店礼品卡、杂货配送/取货和冷冻餐。在试点研究中,53 名护理人员(占筛选人数的 25%)在其子女住院期间认可了 FI,并接受了一项或多项干预措施。每个照顾者都选择了食品礼品卡选项;37 个家庭(69.8%)还收到了冷冻餐。出院七天后,大多数护理人员认为干预措施 "完全 "可行(76%)、可接受(90%)和适当(88%)。与住院期间相比,出院后报告 FI 的护理人员明显减少(P 结论:本研究证明了干预措施的可行性、可接受性和适当性:这项研究表明,住院干预对解决 FI 问题具有可行性、可接受性和适宜性,尤其是在儿科出院和回家过渡期间。需要进行随机试验来进一步评估住院期间采用的干预措施的疗效。
Addressing food insecurity in the inpatient setting: Results of a postdischarge pilot study
Background and Objectives
With a growing interest in screening for food insecurity (FI) during pediatric hospitalization, there is a parallel need to develop interventions. With input from caregivers experiencing FI, we sought to identify interventions to assist with short-term FI after discharge and evaluate their feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness.
Methods
We first employed qualitative methods to identify potential interventions. Next, we conducted a pilot study of selected interventions for families experiencing FI. Seven days postdischarge, caregivers rated the intervention's feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. We also assessed for ongoing FI. We summarized the median and proportion of “completely agree” responses to feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness questions, and we compared in-hospital and postdischarge FI using McNemar's test.
Results
In the qualitative stage, 14 caregivers prioritized three interventions: grocery store gift cards, grocery delivery/pick-up, and frozen meals. In the pilot study, 53 caregivers (25% of those screened) endorsed FI during their child's hospitalization and received one or more of the interventions. Every caregiver selected the grocery gift card option; 37 families (69.8%) also received frozen meals. Seven days after discharge, most caregivers rated the intervention as “completely” feasible (76%), acceptable (90%), and appropriate (88%). There was a significant decrease in caregivers who reported FI after discharge compared to during the hospitalization (p < .001).
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of inpatient interventions to address FI, particularly at the time of pediatric hospital discharge and transition home. Randomized trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of interventions employed during hospitalization.
期刊介绍:
JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children.
Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.