胰十二指肠切除术后隔离 Roux-en-Y 与单环胰空肠重建--随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-01
E E D Abu-Zeid, I U Garzali, A Aloun, A A Sheshe
{"title":"胰十二指肠切除术后隔离 Roux-en-Y 与单环胰空肠重建--随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"E E D Abu-Zeid, I U Garzali, A Aloun, A A Sheshe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex intra-abdominal operation used for the treatment of benign and malignant disease of the pancreatic head or periampullary region. Despite developments in surgical techniques, pancreaticoduodenectomy is still associated with high rate of postoperative complications. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy (IRYPJ), and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy(CPJ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We searched the following electronic databases - PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinical-Trials.gov. Published trials comparing the efficacy and safety of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated. The search terms were \"pancreaticoduodenectomy,\" \"Whipple,\" \"pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy,\" \"pancreaticojejunostomy,\" \"Roux-en-Y,\" and \"isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy.\" Only randomised controlled trials comparing outcome of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. The analysed outcome measures were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), bile leak and delayed gastric emptying (DGE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 342 results but only four randomised control trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included for data synthesis and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of POPF revealed that IRYPJ is associated with less POPF compared to CPJ but the difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.56). A similar finding was also observed with CR-POPF (risk ratio = 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.87) and DGE (risk ratio = 0.74, <i>p</i> = 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy is not associated with a superior outcome when compared to CPJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"62 2","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolated Roux-en-Y versus single loop pancreaticojejunal reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"E E D Abu-Zeid, I U Garzali, A Aloun, A A Sheshe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex intra-abdominal operation used for the treatment of benign and malignant disease of the pancreatic head or periampullary region. Despite developments in surgical techniques, pancreaticoduodenectomy is still associated with high rate of postoperative complications. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy (IRYPJ), and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy(CPJ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We searched the following electronic databases - PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinical-Trials.gov. Published trials comparing the efficacy and safety of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated. The search terms were \\\"pancreaticoduodenectomy,\\\" \\\"Whipple,\\\" \\\"pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy,\\\" \\\"pancreaticojejunostomy,\\\" \\\"Roux-en-Y,\\\" and \\\"isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy.\\\" Only randomised controlled trials comparing outcome of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. The analysed outcome measures were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), bile leak and delayed gastric emptying (DGE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 342 results but only four randomised control trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included for data synthesis and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of POPF revealed that IRYPJ is associated with less POPF compared to CPJ but the difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.56). A similar finding was also observed with CR-POPF (risk ratio = 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.87) and DGE (risk ratio = 0.74, <i>p</i> = 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy is not associated with a superior outcome when compared to CPJ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"62 2\",\"pages\":\"28-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰十二指肠切除术是一种复杂的腹腔内手术,用于治疗胰头或胰腺周围的良性和恶性疾病。尽管手术技术不断发展,胰十二指肠切除术的术后并发症发生率仍然很高。我们进行了这项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,以比较孤立Roux-en-Y胰腺空肠吻合术(IRYPJ)和传统胰腺空肠吻合术(CPJ)的手术效果:我们根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis,PRISMA)声明进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。我们检索了以下电子数据库:PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 对照试验中央注册中心 (CENTRAL) 和 Clinical-Trials.gov。对已发表的比较胰十二指肠切除术后 IRYPJ 和 CPJ 的有效性和安全性的试验进行了评估。搜索关键词为 "胰十二指肠切除术"、"Whipple"、"保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术"、"胰空肠吻合术"、"Roux-en-Y "和 "孤立Roux环路胰空肠吻合术"。仅纳入了比较胰十二指肠切除术后 IRYPJ 和 CPJ 效果的随机对照试验。分析的结果指标包括术后胰瘘(POPF)、临床相关的胰瘘(CR-POPF)、胆漏和胃排空延迟(DGE):最初的搜索结果有 342 项,但只有四项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,并被纳入数据综合和荟萃分析。POPF 的荟萃分析表明,与 CPJ 相比,IRYPJ 与较少的 POPF 相关,但差异无统计学意义(风险比 = 0.58,P = 0.56)。CR-POPF(风险比 = 0.17,P = 0.87)和 DGE(风险比 = 0.74,P = 0.46)也有类似发现:结论:与 CPJ 相比,隔离 Rouxen-Y 胰腺空肠吻合术的疗效并不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Isolated Roux-en-Y versus single loop pancreaticojejunal reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex intra-abdominal operation used for the treatment of benign and malignant disease of the pancreatic head or periampullary region. Despite developments in surgical techniques, pancreaticoduodenectomy is still associated with high rate of postoperative complications. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy (IRYPJ), and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy(CPJ).

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We searched the following electronic databases - PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinical-Trials.gov. Published trials comparing the efficacy and safety of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated. The search terms were "pancreaticoduodenectomy," "Whipple," "pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy," "pancreaticojejunostomy," "Roux-en-Y," and "isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy." Only randomised controlled trials comparing outcome of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. The analysed outcome measures were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), bile leak and delayed gastric emptying (DGE).

Results: The initial search yielded 342 results but only four randomised control trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included for data synthesis and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of POPF revealed that IRYPJ is associated with less POPF compared to CPJ but the difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 0.58, p = 0.56). A similar finding was also observed with CR-POPF (risk ratio = 0.17, p = 0.87) and DGE (risk ratio = 0.74, p = 0.46).

Conclusion: Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy is not associated with a superior outcome when compared to CPJ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
A case report on lingual schwannoma. Adult small bowel volvulus - a case series. Can we trust the data? - the data detective. Endoscopy-induced complication of barotrauma with concomitant benign pneumoperitoneum. Late presentation of Bochdalek hernia in children - experience at a single centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1