Prominence and coronal rain formation by steady versus stochastic heating and how we can relate it to observations

Prominences and coronal rain are two forms of coronal condensations for which we still lack satisfactory details on the formation pathways and conditions under which the two come to exist. Even more so, it is unclear why prominences and filaments appear in so many different shapes and sizes, with a vertical rather than a horizontal structure or vice-versa. It is also not clear why coronal rain is present in some cases and not in others. Our aim is to understand the formation process of prominences and coronal rain in more detail by exploring what influence two specific heating prescriptions can have on the resulting formation and evolution, using simulations. We try to determine why we see prominences with such a variety in their properties, particularly by looking at the large-scale topology and dynamics. We attempted to recreate some of these aspects by simulating different types of localised heating. Besides the differences we see on a large scale, we also attempted to determine what the smaller-scale phenomena are, such as reconnection, the influence of resistivity (or lack thereof), the influence of flows and oscillations. We compared prominences that formed via a steady versus stochastic type of heating. We performed 2.5D simulations using the open-source MPI-AMRVAC code. To further extend the work and allow for future direct comparison with observations, we used Lightweaver to form spectra of the filament view of our steady case prominence. With that, we analysed a reconnection event that shares certain characteristics with nanojets. We show how different forms of localised heating that induce thermal instability result in prominences with different properties. The steady form of heating results in prominence with a clear vertical structure stretching across the magnetic field lines. On the other hand, stochastic heating produces many threads that predominantly have a horizontal motion along the field lines. Furthermore, the specific type of heating also influences the small-scale dynamics. In the steady heating case, the prominence is relatively static; however, there is evidence of reconnection happening almost the entire time the prominence is present. In the case of stochastic heating, the threads are highly dynamic, with them also exhibiting a form of transverse oscillation (strongly resembling the decayless type) similar to the vertically polarised oscillations previously found in observations. The fact that the threads in the stochastic heating case are constantly moving along the field lines suppresses any conditions for reconnection. It, therefore, appears that, to first order, the choice of heating prescription defines whether the prominence-internal dynamics are oriented vertically or horizontally. We closely inspected a sample reconnection event and computed the synthetic optically thick radiation using the open-source Lightweaver radiative transfer framework. We find the associated dynamics to imprint clear signatures, both in Doppler and emission, on the resulting spectra that should be testable with state-of-the-art instrumentation such as DKIST.