COVID-19 大流行如何影响日本老年人对机器人技术的需求?

IF 2.9 Q2 ROBOTICS Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2024.1363243
Takanori Komatsu, Marlena R. Fraune, Katherine M. Tsui, Shogo Suda, Mizuki Kobayashi
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行如何影响日本老年人对机器人技术的需求?","authors":"Takanori Komatsu, Marlena R. Fraune, Katherine M. Tsui, Shogo Suda, Mizuki Kobayashi","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1363243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social technology can improve the quality of social lives of older adults (OAs) and mitigate negative mental and physical health outcomes. When people engage with technology, they can do so to stimulate social interaction (stimulation hypothesis) or disengage from their real world (disengagement hypothesis), according to Nowland et al.‘s model of the relationship between social Internet use and loneliness. External events, such as large periods of social isolation like during the COVID-19 pandemic, can also affect whether people use technology in line with the stimulation or disengagement hypothesis. We examined how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the social challenges OAs faced and their expectations for robot technology to solve their challenges. We conducted two participatory design (PD) workshops with OAs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, OAs’ primary concern was distanced communication with family members, with a prevalent desire to assist them through technology. They also wanted to share experiences socially, as such OA’s attitude toward technology could be explained mostly by the stimulation hypothesis. However, after COVID-19 the pandemic, their focus shifted towards their own wellbeing. Social isolation and loneliness were already significant issues for OAs, and these were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, such OAs’ attitudes toward technology after the pandemic could be explained mostly by the disengagement hypothesis. This clearly reflect the OA’s current situation that they have been getting further digitally excluded due to rapid technological development during the pandemic. Both during and after the pandemic, OAs found it important to have technologies that were easy to use, which would reduce their digital exclusion. After the pandemic, we found this especially in relation to newly developed technologies meant to help people keep at a distance. To effectively integrate these technologies and avoid excluding large parts of the population, society must address the social challenges faced by OAs.","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How did COVID-19 pandemic affect the older adults’ needs for robot technologies in Japan?: comparison of participatory design workshops during versus after the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Takanori Komatsu, Marlena R. Fraune, Katherine M. Tsui, Shogo Suda, Mizuki Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frobt.2024.1363243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social technology can improve the quality of social lives of older adults (OAs) and mitigate negative mental and physical health outcomes. When people engage with technology, they can do so to stimulate social interaction (stimulation hypothesis) or disengage from their real world (disengagement hypothesis), according to Nowland et al.‘s model of the relationship between social Internet use and loneliness. External events, such as large periods of social isolation like during the COVID-19 pandemic, can also affect whether people use technology in line with the stimulation or disengagement hypothesis. We examined how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the social challenges OAs faced and their expectations for robot technology to solve their challenges. We conducted two participatory design (PD) workshops with OAs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, OAs’ primary concern was distanced communication with family members, with a prevalent desire to assist them through technology. They also wanted to share experiences socially, as such OA’s attitude toward technology could be explained mostly by the stimulation hypothesis. However, after COVID-19 the pandemic, their focus shifted towards their own wellbeing. Social isolation and loneliness were already significant issues for OAs, and these were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, such OAs’ attitudes toward technology after the pandemic could be explained mostly by the disengagement hypothesis. This clearly reflect the OA’s current situation that they have been getting further digitally excluded due to rapid technological development during the pandemic. Both during and after the pandemic, OAs found it important to have technologies that were easy to use, which would reduce their digital exclusion. After the pandemic, we found this especially in relation to newly developed technologies meant to help people keep at a distance. To effectively integrate these technologies and avoid excluding large parts of the population, society must address the social challenges faced by OAs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Robotics and AI\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Robotics and AI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1363243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ROBOTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1363243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交技术可以提高老年人(OAs)的社交生活质量,减轻对身心健康的负面影响。根据 Nowland 等人关于社交网络使用与孤独感之间关系的模型,当人们使用技术时,他们可能是为了刺激社交互动(刺激假说),也可能是为了脱离现实世界(脱离假说)。外部事件,如 COVID-19 大流行期间的大规模社会隔离,也会影响人们是按照刺激假说还是脱离假说使用技术。我们研究了 COVID-19 大流行如何影响 OA 所面临的社会挑战以及他们对机器人技术解决其挑战的期望。在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后,我们与 OA 进行了两次参与式设计(PD)研讨会。在大流行期间,OA们最关心的问题是与家人的沟通距离,普遍希望通过技术来帮助他们。他们还希望在社交场合分享经验,因此 OA 对技术的态度主要可以用刺激假说来解释。然而,在 COVID-19 大流行之后,他们的关注点转向了自身的福祉。对于 OA 来说,社会隔离和孤独感本已是重大问题,而 COVID-19 大流行则加剧了这些问题。因此,这些 OA 在大流行后对科技的态度主要可以用脱离假说来解释。这清楚地反映了 OA 的现状,即在大流行期间,由于科技的快速发展,他们被进一步排除在数字世界之外。无论是在大流行期间还是之后,OA 都认为拥有易于使用的技术非常重要,这将减少他们的数字排斥。在大流行之后,我们发现新开发的旨在帮助人们保持距离的技术尤其如此。为了有效整合这些技术,避免排斥大部分人口,社会必须解决 OA 所面临的社会挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How did COVID-19 pandemic affect the older adults’ needs for robot technologies in Japan?: comparison of participatory design workshops during versus after the COVID-19 pandemic
Social technology can improve the quality of social lives of older adults (OAs) and mitigate negative mental and physical health outcomes. When people engage with technology, they can do so to stimulate social interaction (stimulation hypothesis) or disengage from their real world (disengagement hypothesis), according to Nowland et al.‘s model of the relationship between social Internet use and loneliness. External events, such as large periods of social isolation like during the COVID-19 pandemic, can also affect whether people use technology in line with the stimulation or disengagement hypothesis. We examined how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the social challenges OAs faced and their expectations for robot technology to solve their challenges. We conducted two participatory design (PD) workshops with OAs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, OAs’ primary concern was distanced communication with family members, with a prevalent desire to assist them through technology. They also wanted to share experiences socially, as such OA’s attitude toward technology could be explained mostly by the stimulation hypothesis. However, after COVID-19 the pandemic, their focus shifted towards their own wellbeing. Social isolation and loneliness were already significant issues for OAs, and these were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, such OAs’ attitudes toward technology after the pandemic could be explained mostly by the disengagement hypothesis. This clearly reflect the OA’s current situation that they have been getting further digitally excluded due to rapid technological development during the pandemic. Both during and after the pandemic, OAs found it important to have technologies that were easy to use, which would reduce their digital exclusion. After the pandemic, we found this especially in relation to newly developed technologies meant to help people keep at a distance. To effectively integrate these technologies and avoid excluding large parts of the population, society must address the social challenges faced by OAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
期刊最新文献
Cybernic robot hand-arm that realizes cooperative work as a new hand-arm for people with a single upper-limb dysfunction. Advancements in the use of AI in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Remote science at sea with remotely operated vehicles. A pipeline for estimating human attention toward objects with on-board cameras on the iCub humanoid robot. Leveraging imitation learning in agricultural robotics: a comprehensive survey and comparative analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1