不同公式与闪烁成像测量的肾脏捐献者 GFR 的比较

Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.25259/ijn_417_23
Gerard Vinodh, P. Dheerendra, Aleya Anitha, D. Anandkumar, Deepesh Vellakampadi, Gokulnath
{"title":"不同公式与闪烁成像测量的肾脏捐献者 GFR 的比较","authors":"Gerard Vinodh, P. Dheerendra, Aleya Anitha, D. Anandkumar, Deepesh Vellakampadi, Gokulnath","doi":"10.25259/ijn_417_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nTechnetium-99m diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (99mTc-DTPA)-based scintigraphy is a convenient way to assess measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in kidney donors. Equations have been developed to calculate GFR in the general population. This study aims to identify the best among commonly employed equations to better predict GFR when compared with scintigraphy-based mGFR. Also, the trends in mGFR values were studied over 1 year post-donation.\n\n\n\nThirty-four kidney donors were recruited for this study from November 2017 to November 2018 and followed-up for a year. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Collaboration equation, and Nankivell formula; the values were compared to that obtained using 99mTc-DTPA both pre-and post-donation. Correlation and agreement between the eGFR and mGFR were studied using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 and Microsoft Excel.\n\n\n\nmGFR was augmented by 32.3 ± 27.8% in the remnant kidney post-donation. The baseline mGFR, post-donation mGFR, and the quantum of its increase post-donation did not differ between overweight donors and donors with normal body mass index (BMI). mGFR correlated poorly with all the eGFR equations both pre- and post-donation. Bland-Altman analysis showed weak agreement with significant bias and variance between mGFR and all eGFR equations.\n\n\n\nIn Indian kidney donors, mGFR by 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy shows poor correlation and agreement with the commonly used eGFR equations. An individualized approach is needed to assess the kidney function of live donors to minimize harm to both the recipient and the donor.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Equations with GFR Measured by Scintigraphy in Kidney Donors\",\"authors\":\"Gerard Vinodh, P. Dheerendra, Aleya Anitha, D. Anandkumar, Deepesh Vellakampadi, Gokulnath\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijn_417_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nTechnetium-99m diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (99mTc-DTPA)-based scintigraphy is a convenient way to assess measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in kidney donors. Equations have been developed to calculate GFR in the general population. This study aims to identify the best among commonly employed equations to better predict GFR when compared with scintigraphy-based mGFR. Also, the trends in mGFR values were studied over 1 year post-donation.\\n\\n\\n\\nThirty-four kidney donors were recruited for this study from November 2017 to November 2018 and followed-up for a year. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Collaboration equation, and Nankivell formula; the values were compared to that obtained using 99mTc-DTPA both pre-and post-donation. Correlation and agreement between the eGFR and mGFR were studied using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 and Microsoft Excel.\\n\\n\\n\\nmGFR was augmented by 32.3 ± 27.8% in the remnant kidney post-donation. The baseline mGFR, post-donation mGFR, and the quantum of its increase post-donation did not differ between overweight donors and donors with normal body mass index (BMI). mGFR correlated poorly with all the eGFR equations both pre- and post-donation. Bland-Altman analysis showed weak agreement with significant bias and variance between mGFR and all eGFR equations.\\n\\n\\n\\nIn Indian kidney donors, mGFR by 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy shows poor correlation and agreement with the commonly used eGFR equations. An individualized approach is needed to assess the kidney function of live donors to minimize harm to both the recipient and the donor.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijn_417_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijn_417_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于锝-99m 二乙三胺五醋酸酯(99m锝-DTPA)的闪烁扫描是评估肾脏捐献者肾小球滤过率(mGFR)的一种便捷方法。目前已开发出计算普通人群肾小球滤过率的公式。本研究旨在确定常用方程中的最佳方程,以便与基于闪烁扫描的 mGFR 相比,更好地预测 GFR。2017年11月至2018年11月,本研究招募了34名肾脏捐献者,并进行了为期一年的随访。使用肾脏病饮食改良(MDRD)方程、慢性肾脏病流行病学(CKD-EPI)协作方程和 Nankivell 公式计算估算的 GFR(eGFR),并与捐肾前和捐肾后使用 99mTc-DTPA 获得的值进行比较。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)23.0 版和 Microsoft Excel 对 eGFR 和 mGFR 之间的相关性和一致性进行了研究。超重捐献者与体重指数(BMI)正常的捐献者之间的 mGFR 基线、捐献后 mGFR 及其增加量没有差异。在印度肾脏捐献者中,99m锝-DTPA闪烁扫描显示的mGFR与常用的eGFR方程的相关性和一致性较差。需要采用个体化的方法来评估活体捐肾者的肾功能,以尽量减少对受者和捐肾者的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Comparison of Different Equations with GFR Measured by Scintigraphy in Kidney Donors
Technetium-99m diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (99mTc-DTPA)-based scintigraphy is a convenient way to assess measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in kidney donors. Equations have been developed to calculate GFR in the general population. This study aims to identify the best among commonly employed equations to better predict GFR when compared with scintigraphy-based mGFR. Also, the trends in mGFR values were studied over 1 year post-donation. Thirty-four kidney donors were recruited for this study from November 2017 to November 2018 and followed-up for a year. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Collaboration equation, and Nankivell formula; the values were compared to that obtained using 99mTc-DTPA both pre-and post-donation. Correlation and agreement between the eGFR and mGFR were studied using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 and Microsoft Excel. mGFR was augmented by 32.3 ± 27.8% in the remnant kidney post-donation. The baseline mGFR, post-donation mGFR, and the quantum of its increase post-donation did not differ between overweight donors and donors with normal body mass index (BMI). mGFR correlated poorly with all the eGFR equations both pre- and post-donation. Bland-Altman analysis showed weak agreement with significant bias and variance between mGFR and all eGFR equations. In Indian kidney donors, mGFR by 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy shows poor correlation and agreement with the commonly used eGFR equations. An individualized approach is needed to assess the kidney function of live donors to minimize harm to both the recipient and the donor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1