利用模型检查和 CTL 验证铁路控制系统,通过案例研究加以说明

Gábor Lukács, Tamás Bartha
{"title":"利用模型检查和 CTL 验证铁路控制系统,通过案例研究加以说明","authors":"Gábor Lukács, Tamás Bartha","doi":"10.3311/pptr.23344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systematic faults can often occur during the development of a system. The later such faults are discovered, the more expensive it can be to correct them. In systems engineering practice, there are many methods and tools to reduce the likelihood of systematic faults. In this paper, we present the application of a formal model–based verification technique – called model checking – to assist railway engineers in designing and verifying the safety-related functionality of railway control systems. The proposed process is part of a specification-verification environment that facilitates the construction of correct, complete, consistent, and verifiable functional specifications during development. The results and experience in model checking are illustrated by a case study of a vehicle detection point, a common component in this domain. The model checking of the case study has been performed in the widely used UPPAAL modeling and simulation framework, which can also verify formal properties and generate a counterexample in case of a property violation. By analyzing the counterexample, the designer can gain insights into the system's behavior and identify potential design flaws or failures. Model checking can be used to achieve a higher quality functional specification that is typically more complete and/or contains fewer faults compared to the traditional development approach.","PeriodicalId":39536,"journal":{"name":"Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of Railway Control Systems Using Model Checking and CTL, Explained Through a Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Gábor Lukács, Tamás Bartha\",\"doi\":\"10.3311/pptr.23344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systematic faults can often occur during the development of a system. The later such faults are discovered, the more expensive it can be to correct them. In systems engineering practice, there are many methods and tools to reduce the likelihood of systematic faults. In this paper, we present the application of a formal model–based verification technique – called model checking – to assist railway engineers in designing and verifying the safety-related functionality of railway control systems. The proposed process is part of a specification-verification environment that facilitates the construction of correct, complete, consistent, and verifiable functional specifications during development. The results and experience in model checking are illustrated by a case study of a vehicle detection point, a common component in this domain. The model checking of the case study has been performed in the widely used UPPAAL modeling and simulation framework, which can also verify formal properties and generate a counterexample in case of a property violation. By analyzing the counterexample, the designer can gain insights into the system's behavior and identify potential design flaws or failures. Model checking can be used to achieve a higher quality functional specification that is typically more complete and/or contains fewer faults compared to the traditional development approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"72 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3311/pptr.23344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/pptr.23344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统故障往往发生在系统开发过程中。这类故障发现得越晚,纠正的成本就越高。在系统工程实践中,有许多方法和工具可以降低系统故障发生的可能性。在本文中,我们介绍了一种基于模型的正式验证技术(称为模型检查)的应用,以协助铁路工程师设计和验证铁路控制系统的安全相关功能。所提出的流程是规范验证环境的一部分,有助于在开发过程中构建正确、完整、一致且可验证的功能规范。本领域的常见组件--车辆检测点的案例研究说明了模型检查的结果和经验。该案例研究的模型检查是在广泛使用的 UPPAAL 建模和仿真框架中进行的,该框架还可以验证形式属性,并在违反属性时生成反例。通过分析反例,设计者可以深入了解系统的行为,找出潜在的设计缺陷或故障。与传统开发方法相比,模型检查可用于实现更高质量的功能规范,这种规范通常更完整和/或包含更少的故障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Verification of Railway Control Systems Using Model Checking and CTL, Explained Through a Case Study
Systematic faults can often occur during the development of a system. The later such faults are discovered, the more expensive it can be to correct them. In systems engineering practice, there are many methods and tools to reduce the likelihood of systematic faults. In this paper, we present the application of a formal model–based verification technique – called model checking – to assist railway engineers in designing and verifying the safety-related functionality of railway control systems. The proposed process is part of a specification-verification environment that facilitates the construction of correct, complete, consistent, and verifiable functional specifications during development. The results and experience in model checking are illustrated by a case study of a vehicle detection point, a common component in this domain. The model checking of the case study has been performed in the widely used UPPAAL modeling and simulation framework, which can also verify formal properties and generate a counterexample in case of a property violation. By analyzing the counterexample, the designer can gain insights into the system's behavior and identify potential design flaws or failures. Model checking can be used to achieve a higher quality functional specification that is typically more complete and/or contains fewer faults compared to the traditional development approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering
Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Periodica Polytechnica is a publisher of the Budapest University of Technology and Economics. It publishes seven international journals (Architecture, Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Social and Management Sciences, Transportation Engineering). The journals have free electronic versions.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Preference on Public Transport in a Metropolitan Area of Lampung Province, Indonesia Secure Travel Planning Using a Heuristic Algorithm Verification of Railway Control Systems Using Model Checking and CTL, Explained Through a Case Study A Grid-based Framework for Managing Autonomous Vehicles' Movement at Intersections The Environmental Sustainability Potential of Autonomous Vehicles: An Overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1