移动新闻访问、移动新闻惯用手法和用户谈论新闻的倾向--移动新闻消费的体验取样研究

V. Karnowski, Katharina Knop-Huelss, Zoe Olbermann
{"title":"移动新闻访问、移动新闻惯用手法和用户谈论新闻的倾向--移动新闻消费的体验取样研究","authors":"V. Karnowski, Katharina Knop-Huelss, Zoe Olbermann","doi":"10.1515/omgc-2023-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Over the past three decades, our media ecologies have substantially transformed, changing how people get in touch with the news. These changes have also led to higher variability in news access across users’ daily lives. Using the microcosm of mobile news consumption as a proxy for the changes in our general news use, we explore types of mobile news access and mobile news repertoires and their relations to users’ tendency to talk about the news. Our exploratory study aims to describe intra- and inter-personal variations in mobile news use. By taking this fine-grained perspective on mobile news use, we provide a more comprehensive assessment than cross-sectional studies, which is valuable to researchers and practitioners in mobile news.\n \n \n \n We conducted a 14-day experience sampling study among 72 young adult Germans. We received 2,211 filled-in in-situ questionnaires based on three daily alerts, reporting on 560 mobile news situations. We used multi-level latent class analysis to simultaneously assess patterns of mobile news access and mobile news repertoires.\n \n \n \n We uncover five distinct types of mobile news access embedded in four mobile news repertoires. These findings highlight the considerable intra-individual heterogeneity in mobile news use. However, these heterogeneities only scarcely manifest in users’ tendency to talk about the news.\n \n \n \n Our study highlights the importance of acknowledging intra-individual variation when studying news use and its implications. Most importantly, we see that no mobile news repertoire among our sample relies solely on social media-based mobile news access. Researchers and practitioners must acknowledge these heterogeneities when discussing the benefits and perils of social media-based news access.\n","PeriodicalId":29805,"journal":{"name":"Online Media and Global Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile news access, mobile news repertoires, and users’ tendency to talk about the news – an experience sampling study on mobile news consumption\",\"authors\":\"V. Karnowski, Katharina Knop-Huelss, Zoe Olbermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/omgc-2023-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Over the past three decades, our media ecologies have substantially transformed, changing how people get in touch with the news. These changes have also led to higher variability in news access across users’ daily lives. Using the microcosm of mobile news consumption as a proxy for the changes in our general news use, we explore types of mobile news access and mobile news repertoires and their relations to users’ tendency to talk about the news. Our exploratory study aims to describe intra- and inter-personal variations in mobile news use. By taking this fine-grained perspective on mobile news use, we provide a more comprehensive assessment than cross-sectional studies, which is valuable to researchers and practitioners in mobile news.\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted a 14-day experience sampling study among 72 young adult Germans. We received 2,211 filled-in in-situ questionnaires based on three daily alerts, reporting on 560 mobile news situations. We used multi-level latent class analysis to simultaneously assess patterns of mobile news access and mobile news repertoires.\\n \\n \\n \\n We uncover five distinct types of mobile news access embedded in four mobile news repertoires. These findings highlight the considerable intra-individual heterogeneity in mobile news use. However, these heterogeneities only scarcely manifest in users’ tendency to talk about the news.\\n \\n \\n \\n Our study highlights the importance of acknowledging intra-individual variation when studying news use and its implications. Most importantly, we see that no mobile news repertoire among our sample relies solely on social media-based mobile news access. Researchers and practitioners must acknowledge these heterogeneities when discussing the benefits and perils of social media-based news access.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":29805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Media and Global Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Media and Global Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Media and Global Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去三十年来,我们的媒体生态发生了巨大变化,改变了人们接触新闻的方式。这些变化也导致用户在日常生活中获取新闻的方式更加多变。我们将移动新闻消费这一微观世界作为我们一般新闻使用变化的代表,探索移动新闻访问和移动新闻习惯的类型及其与用户谈论新闻的倾向之间的关系。我们的探索性研究旨在描述移动新闻使用中的个人内部和个人之间的差异。通过对移动新闻使用的这种细粒度视角,我们提供了比横截面研究更全面的评估,这对移动新闻研究人员和从业人员都很有价值。 我们对 72 名德国年轻人进行了为期 14 天的体验取样研究。我们收到了 2,211 份填写完整的现场问卷,这些问卷基于每天的三次提醒,报告了 560 种移动新闻情况。我们使用多层次潜类分析法同时评估了移动新闻访问模式和移动新闻习惯。 我们发现了五种不同类型的移动新闻访问,并将其嵌入到四种移动新闻组合中。这些发现凸显了移动新闻使用中相当大的个体内部异质性。然而,这些异质性很少体现在用户谈论新闻的倾向上。 我们的研究强调了在研究新闻使用及其影响时承认个体内部差异的重要性。最重要的是,我们发现在我们的样本中,没有一个移动新闻剧目仅仅依赖于基于社交媒体的移动新闻访问。研究人员和从业人员在讨论基于社交媒体的新闻访问的益处和危险时,必须承认这些异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mobile news access, mobile news repertoires, and users’ tendency to talk about the news – an experience sampling study on mobile news consumption
Over the past three decades, our media ecologies have substantially transformed, changing how people get in touch with the news. These changes have also led to higher variability in news access across users’ daily lives. Using the microcosm of mobile news consumption as a proxy for the changes in our general news use, we explore types of mobile news access and mobile news repertoires and their relations to users’ tendency to talk about the news. Our exploratory study aims to describe intra- and inter-personal variations in mobile news use. By taking this fine-grained perspective on mobile news use, we provide a more comprehensive assessment than cross-sectional studies, which is valuable to researchers and practitioners in mobile news. We conducted a 14-day experience sampling study among 72 young adult Germans. We received 2,211 filled-in in-situ questionnaires based on three daily alerts, reporting on 560 mobile news situations. We used multi-level latent class analysis to simultaneously assess patterns of mobile news access and mobile news repertoires. We uncover five distinct types of mobile news access embedded in four mobile news repertoires. These findings highlight the considerable intra-individual heterogeneity in mobile news use. However, these heterogeneities only scarcely manifest in users’ tendency to talk about the news. Our study highlights the importance of acknowledging intra-individual variation when studying news use and its implications. Most importantly, we see that no mobile news repertoire among our sample relies solely on social media-based mobile news access. Researchers and practitioners must acknowledge these heterogeneities when discussing the benefits and perils of social media-based news access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Media and Global Communication
Online Media and Global Communication Communication, Media Studies, Internet Studies, International Studies, International Relations-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Online Media and Global Communication (OMGC) is a new venue for high quality articles on theories and methods about the role of online media in global communication. This journal is sponsored by the Center for Global Public Opinion Research of China and School of Journalism and Communication, Shanghai International Studies University, China. It is published solely online in English. The journal aims to serve as an academic bridge in the research of online media and global communication between the dominating English-speaking world and the non-English speaking world that has remained mostly invisible due to language barriers. Through its structured abstracts for all research articles and uniform keyword system in the United Nations’ official six languages plus Japanese and German (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, Spanish, Japanese, and German), the journal provides a highly accessible platform to users worldwide. Its unique dual track single-blind and double-blind review system facilitates manuscript reviews with different levels of author identities. OMGC publishes review essays on the state-of-the-art in online media and global communication research in different countries and regions, original research papers on topics related online media and global communication and translated articles from non-English speaking Global South. It strives to be a leading platform for scientific exchange in online media and global communication. For events and more, consider following us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/OMGCJOURNAL. Topics OMGC publishes high quality, innovative and original research on global communication especially in the use of global online media platforms such as Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp, Weibo, WeChat, Wikipedia, web sites, blogs, etc. This journal will address the contemporary concerns about the effects and operations of global digital media platforms on international relations, international public opinion, fake news and propaganda dissemination, diaspora communication, consumer behavior as well as the balance of voices in the world. Comparative research across countries are particularly welcome. Empirical research is preferred over conceptual papers. Article Formats In addition to the standard research article format, the Journal includes the following formats: ● One translation paper selected from Non-English Journals that with high quality as “Gems from the Global South” per issue ● One review essay on current state of research in online media and global communication in a country or region
期刊最新文献
Mobile news access, mobile news repertoires, and users’ tendency to talk about the news – an experience sampling study on mobile news consumption “Tears have never won anyone freedom:” a multimodal discourse analysis of Ukraine’s use of memes in a propaganda war of global scale Victims or villains? How editorial cartoons depict the 2023 Israel – Palestine war Mobile app adoption comparison between U.S. and Chinese college students: information processing style and use frequency after download Path to global knowledge: a review of Chinese scholars on international publishing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1