{"title":"HIFAST:用于 FAST II 的 HI 数据校准和成像管道。通量密度校准","authors":"Ziming Liu, Jie Wang, Ying-Jie Jing, Zhiyu Zhang, Chen Xu, Qingze Chen, Ningyu Tang, Qingliang Yang, Tiantian Liang","doi":"10.1088/1674-4527/ad5398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Accurate flux density calibration is essential for precise analysis and interpretation of observations across different observation modes and instruments. In this research, we introduce the flux calibration model incorporated in HIFAST pipeline, designed for processing HI 21-cm spectra. Furthermore, we investigate different calibration techniques and assess the dependence of the gain parameter on the time and environmental factors. A comparison is carried out in various observation modes (e.g. tracking and scanning modes) to determine the flux density gain (G), revealing insignificant discrepancies in G among different methods. Long-term monitoring data shows a linear correlation between G and atmospheric temperature. After subtracting the G - Temperature dependence, the dispersion of G is reduced to <3% over a one-year time scale. The stability of the receiver response of FAST is considered sufficient to facilitate HI observations that can accommodate a moderate error in flux calibration (e.g., >~5%) when utilizing a constant G for calibration purposes. Our study will serve as a useful addition to the results provided by Jiang et al (2020). Detailed measurements of G for the 19 beams of FAST, covering the frequency range 1000 MHz - 1500 MHz can be found on the HIFAST homepage: https://hifast.readthedocs.io/fluxgain","PeriodicalId":509923,"journal":{"name":"Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HIFAST: An HI Data Calibration and Imaging Pipeline for FAST II. Flux Density Calibration\",\"authors\":\"Ziming Liu, Jie Wang, Ying-Jie Jing, Zhiyu Zhang, Chen Xu, Qingze Chen, Ningyu Tang, Qingliang Yang, Tiantian Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1674-4527/ad5398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Accurate flux density calibration is essential for precise analysis and interpretation of observations across different observation modes and instruments. In this research, we introduce the flux calibration model incorporated in HIFAST pipeline, designed for processing HI 21-cm spectra. Furthermore, we investigate different calibration techniques and assess the dependence of the gain parameter on the time and environmental factors. A comparison is carried out in various observation modes (e.g. tracking and scanning modes) to determine the flux density gain (G), revealing insignificant discrepancies in G among different methods. Long-term monitoring data shows a linear correlation between G and atmospheric temperature. After subtracting the G - Temperature dependence, the dispersion of G is reduced to <3% over a one-year time scale. The stability of the receiver response of FAST is considered sufficient to facilitate HI observations that can accommodate a moderate error in flux calibration (e.g., >~5%) when utilizing a constant G for calibration purposes. Our study will serve as a useful addition to the results provided by Jiang et al (2020). Detailed measurements of G for the 19 beams of FAST, covering the frequency range 1000 MHz - 1500 MHz can be found on the HIFAST homepage: https://hifast.readthedocs.io/fluxgain\",\"PeriodicalId\":509923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ad5398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ad5398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
准确的通量密度校准对于精确分析和解释不同观测模式和仪器的观测结果至关重要。在这项研究中,我们介绍了 HIFAST 管道中的通量校准模型,该模型专为处理 HI 21-cm 光谱而设计。此外,我们还研究了不同的校准技术,并评估了增益参数对时间和环境因素的依赖性。我们对各种观测模式(如跟踪和扫描模式)进行了比较,以确定通量密度增益(G),发现不同方法的 G 值差异不大。长期监测数据显示,G 与大气温度呈线性相关。在减去 G 与温度的相关性后,当使用恒定 G 进行校准时,G 的离散性降低到 ~5%。我们的研究将是对 Jiang 等人(2020 年)研究结果的有益补充。关于 FAST 19 个波束的 G 的详细测量结果(覆盖频率范围 1000 MHz - 1500 MHz),请访问 HIFAST 主页:https://hifast.readthedocs.io/fluxgain。
HIFAST: An HI Data Calibration and Imaging Pipeline for FAST II. Flux Density Calibration
Accurate flux density calibration is essential for precise analysis and interpretation of observations across different observation modes and instruments. In this research, we introduce the flux calibration model incorporated in HIFAST pipeline, designed for processing HI 21-cm spectra. Furthermore, we investigate different calibration techniques and assess the dependence of the gain parameter on the time and environmental factors. A comparison is carried out in various observation modes (e.g. tracking and scanning modes) to determine the flux density gain (G), revealing insignificant discrepancies in G among different methods. Long-term monitoring data shows a linear correlation between G and atmospheric temperature. After subtracting the G - Temperature dependence, the dispersion of G is reduced to <3% over a one-year time scale. The stability of the receiver response of FAST is considered sufficient to facilitate HI observations that can accommodate a moderate error in flux calibration (e.g., >~5%) when utilizing a constant G for calibration purposes. Our study will serve as a useful addition to the results provided by Jiang et al (2020). Detailed measurements of G for the 19 beams of FAST, covering the frequency range 1000 MHz - 1500 MHz can be found on the HIFAST homepage: https://hifast.readthedocs.io/fluxgain