用于阻止入侵鲤鱼的模块化电屏障的实验评估

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.3996/jfwm-22-063
Scott F. Collins, A. Porreca, M. Nannini, S. E. Butler, Kyle J. Broadway, Joseph J. Parkos, David H. Wahl
{"title":"用于阻止入侵鲤鱼的模块化电屏障的实验评估","authors":"Scott F. Collins, A. Porreca, M. Nannini, S. E. Butler, Kyle J. Broadway, Joseph J. Parkos, David H. Wahl","doi":"10.3996/jfwm-22-063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We conducted a series of studies to assess the effectiveness of an electric barrier in deterring the movements of freshwater fish. Fish responses (detections⋅individual−1⋅hr−1 within the 3 m exclusion zone) were quantified for a mixed assemblage of native and non-native fishes within 0.4 ha ponds. Additionally, we mapped the surface voltages generated by the electric barrier in a nearby stream. The electric barrier (operated at 10 kW) was effective at deterring native and invasive fishes, as > 99% of all fish detections within the exclusion zone occurred while the electric barrier was off. However, some fish detections occurred while the system was operated at full power, indicating the electric barrier was not 100% effective. A follow-up study found that fish responses differed between low (3.6 kW), medium (6.6 kW), and high (10 kW) field strengths, with Smallmouth Buffalo Ictiobus bubalus exhibiting a greater sensitivity to the low setting than Bighead Carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and Silver Carp H. molitrix. Maps of the surface voltages within a nearby stream indicated that the electric barrier was strong enough to deter Silver Carp (> 1 V/cm). However, the surface voltages quickly dissipated upstream and downstream of the electrodes. Overall, the electric barrier appears to be an effective tool that can be used to combat the spread of invasive fishes in freshwater environments. However, more evaluations are needed to test how the system performs in different conditions and to identify whether fish of varying sizes or life stages respond similarly.","PeriodicalId":49036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Evaluation Of A Modular Electric Barrier For The Deterrence Of Invasive Carp\",\"authors\":\"Scott F. Collins, A. Porreca, M. Nannini, S. E. Butler, Kyle J. Broadway, Joseph J. Parkos, David H. Wahl\",\"doi\":\"10.3996/jfwm-22-063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We conducted a series of studies to assess the effectiveness of an electric barrier in deterring the movements of freshwater fish. Fish responses (detections⋅individual−1⋅hr−1 within the 3 m exclusion zone) were quantified for a mixed assemblage of native and non-native fishes within 0.4 ha ponds. Additionally, we mapped the surface voltages generated by the electric barrier in a nearby stream. The electric barrier (operated at 10 kW) was effective at deterring native and invasive fishes, as > 99% of all fish detections within the exclusion zone occurred while the electric barrier was off. However, some fish detections occurred while the system was operated at full power, indicating the electric barrier was not 100% effective. A follow-up study found that fish responses differed between low (3.6 kW), medium (6.6 kW), and high (10 kW) field strengths, with Smallmouth Buffalo Ictiobus bubalus exhibiting a greater sensitivity to the low setting than Bighead Carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and Silver Carp H. molitrix. Maps of the surface voltages within a nearby stream indicated that the electric barrier was strong enough to deter Silver Carp (> 1 V/cm). However, the surface voltages quickly dissipated upstream and downstream of the electrodes. Overall, the electric barrier appears to be an effective tool that can be used to combat the spread of invasive fishes in freshwater environments. However, more evaluations are needed to test how the system performs in different conditions and to identify whether fish of varying sizes or life stages respond similarly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-22-063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-22-063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们进行了一系列研究,以评估电屏障在阻止淡水鱼类移动方面的效果。我们对 0.4 公顷池塘中本地和非本地鱼类的混合组合的鱼类反应(在 3 米禁区内的检测次数⋅个体-1⋅小时-1)进行了量化。此外,我们还绘制了电屏障在附近溪流中产生的表面电压图。电屏障(工作功率为 10 千瓦)能有效阻止本地鱼类和外来鱼类,因为禁区内超过 99% 的鱼类探测结果都是在电屏障关闭时出现的。不过,在系统全功率运行时,也有一些鱼类被发现,这表明电屏障并非百分之百有效。后续研究发现,鱼类对低功率(3.6 千瓦)、中功率(6.6 千瓦)和高功率(10 千瓦)电场强度的反应不同,小口水牛 Ictiobus bubalus 对低功率设置的敏感度高于鳙鱼 Hypophthalmichthys nobilis 和鲢鱼 H. molitrix。附近溪流的表面电压图显示,电屏障的强度足以阻止鲢鱼(> 1 V/cm)。不过,表面电压很快就会在电极的上游和下游消散。总的来说,电屏障似乎是一种有效的工具,可以用来阻止入侵鱼类在淡水环境中的传播。不过,还需要进行更多的评估,以测试该系统在不同条件下的表现,并确定不同大小或不同生命阶段的鱼类是否有类似的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental Evaluation Of A Modular Electric Barrier For The Deterrence Of Invasive Carp
We conducted a series of studies to assess the effectiveness of an electric barrier in deterring the movements of freshwater fish. Fish responses (detections⋅individual−1⋅hr−1 within the 3 m exclusion zone) were quantified for a mixed assemblage of native and non-native fishes within 0.4 ha ponds. Additionally, we mapped the surface voltages generated by the electric barrier in a nearby stream. The electric barrier (operated at 10 kW) was effective at deterring native and invasive fishes, as > 99% of all fish detections within the exclusion zone occurred while the electric barrier was off. However, some fish detections occurred while the system was operated at full power, indicating the electric barrier was not 100% effective. A follow-up study found that fish responses differed between low (3.6 kW), medium (6.6 kW), and high (10 kW) field strengths, with Smallmouth Buffalo Ictiobus bubalus exhibiting a greater sensitivity to the low setting than Bighead Carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and Silver Carp H. molitrix. Maps of the surface voltages within a nearby stream indicated that the electric barrier was strong enough to deter Silver Carp (> 1 V/cm). However, the surface voltages quickly dissipated upstream and downstream of the electrodes. Overall, the electric barrier appears to be an effective tool that can be used to combat the spread of invasive fishes in freshwater environments. However, more evaluations are needed to test how the system performs in different conditions and to identify whether fish of varying sizes or life stages respond similarly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management encourages submission of original, high quality, English-language scientific papers on the practical application and integration of science to conservation and management of native North American fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats in the following categories: Articles, Notes, Surveys and Issues and Perspectives. Papers that do not relate directly to native North American fish, wildlife plants or their habitats may be considered if they highlight species that are closely related to, or conservation issues that are germane to, those in North America.
期刊最新文献
Using UAVs Equipped With Thermal Cameras To Survey A Known Population Of White-tailed Deer Trends in American alligator pods in Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge Applications of Underwater Video for Imperiled Fish Species Population Monitoring Experimental Assessment of Egg Mat Gear Retention and Collection Efficacy. Environmental drivers and fitness consequences of partial migration under climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1