{"title":"法律专著的梦想","authors":"Benjamin Goh","doi":"10.1177/17438721241255607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article returns to a law and literature classic, Peter Goodrich’s Oedipus Lex (1995), for its contribution to the field’s ongoing reorientation to the materials and media of law. Read alongside Sigmund Freud’s “Dream of the Botanical Monograph” (1899/1900) and in terms of the psychoanalytic dream-work, Goodrich’s book holds out a vital promise for text- and media-oriented studies in law and literature.","PeriodicalId":514759,"journal":{"name":"Law, Culture and the Humanities","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dream of the Legal Monograph\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Goh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17438721241255607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article returns to a law and literature classic, Peter Goodrich’s Oedipus Lex (1995), for its contribution to the field’s ongoing reorientation to the materials and media of law. Read alongside Sigmund Freud’s “Dream of the Botanical Monograph” (1899/1900) and in terms of the psychoanalytic dream-work, Goodrich’s book holds out a vital promise for text- and media-oriented studies in law and literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Culture and the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Culture and the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721241255607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Culture and the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721241255607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article returns to a law and literature classic, Peter Goodrich’s Oedipus Lex (1995), for its contribution to the field’s ongoing reorientation to the materials and media of law. Read alongside Sigmund Freud’s “Dream of the Botanical Monograph” (1899/1900) and in terms of the psychoanalytic dream-work, Goodrich’s book holds out a vital promise for text- and media-oriented studies in law and literature.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
