广义的精神障碍概念可预测自我诊断

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100326
Jesse S.Y. Tse, Nick Haslam
{"title":"广义的精神障碍概念可预测自我诊断","authors":"Jesse S.Y. Tse,&nbsp;Nick Haslam","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding why people identify themselves as having a mental disorder is crucial for making sense of recent rises in self-diagnosis and help-seeking. Previous studies have implicated factors such as levels of distress, mental health literacy, and stigma. Motivated by concept creep research, we tested whether self-diagnosis is also associated with the expansiveness of people's concepts of mental disorder. A nationally representative sample of 474 Americans completed measures of distress, impairment, mental health literacy, stigma, and newly validated concept breadth scales, in addition to current and lifetime mental disorder (both self- and professionally-diagnosed) and help-seeking. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that participants with broader concepts of disorder were more likely to self-diagnose and seek help, independent of distress and impairment, mental health literacy, and low stigma. Holding broader concepts also partially accounted for higher levels of self-diagnosis among younger and more liberal participants and predicted self-diagnosis independently of formal diagnosis. Implications for the surge in self-diagnosis and concerns about pathologization of everyday life are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000318/pdfft?md5=3b0b3466014addab684a168bbd057c94&pid=1-s2.0-S2666560324000318-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Broad concepts of mental disorder predict self-diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Jesse S.Y. Tse,&nbsp;Nick Haslam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding why people identify themselves as having a mental disorder is crucial for making sense of recent rises in self-diagnosis and help-seeking. Previous studies have implicated factors such as levels of distress, mental health literacy, and stigma. Motivated by concept creep research, we tested whether self-diagnosis is also associated with the expansiveness of people's concepts of mental disorder. A nationally representative sample of 474 Americans completed measures of distress, impairment, mental health literacy, stigma, and newly validated concept breadth scales, in addition to current and lifetime mental disorder (both self- and professionally-diagnosed) and help-seeking. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that participants with broader concepts of disorder were more likely to self-diagnose and seek help, independent of distress and impairment, mental health literacy, and low stigma. Holding broader concepts also partially accounted for higher levels of self-diagnosis among younger and more liberal participants and predicted self-diagnosis independently of formal diagnosis. Implications for the surge in self-diagnosis and concerns about pathologization of everyday life are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000318/pdfft?md5=3b0b3466014addab684a168bbd057c94&pid=1-s2.0-S2666560324000318-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解人们为什么会认为自己患有精神障碍,对于理解最近自我诊断和寻求帮助人数的增加至关重要。以往的研究表明,这与患者的痛苦程度、心理健康素养和耻辱感等因素有关。受概念蠕变研究的启发,我们测试了自我诊断是否也与人们对精神障碍概念的扩展性有关。一个由 474 名美国人组成的具有全国代表性的样本完成了对痛苦、损伤、心理健康素养、耻辱感和新验证的概念广度量表的测量,此外还完成了对当前和终生精神障碍(包括自我诊断和专业诊断)和求助的测量。结构方程模型表明,对精神障碍有更宽泛概念的参与者更有可能自我诊断和寻求帮助,这与痛苦和损伤、心理健康素养和低耻辱感无关。持有更宽泛的概念也部分解释了更年轻、更自由的参与者更高水平的自我诊断,并且预测自我诊断与正式诊断无关。本文讨论了自我诊断激增的影响以及对日常生活病理化的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Broad concepts of mental disorder predict self-diagnosis

Understanding why people identify themselves as having a mental disorder is crucial for making sense of recent rises in self-diagnosis and help-seeking. Previous studies have implicated factors such as levels of distress, mental health literacy, and stigma. Motivated by concept creep research, we tested whether self-diagnosis is also associated with the expansiveness of people's concepts of mental disorder. A nationally representative sample of 474 Americans completed measures of distress, impairment, mental health literacy, stigma, and newly validated concept breadth scales, in addition to current and lifetime mental disorder (both self- and professionally-diagnosed) and help-seeking. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that participants with broader concepts of disorder were more likely to self-diagnose and seek help, independent of distress and impairment, mental health literacy, and low stigma. Holding broader concepts also partially accounted for higher levels of self-diagnosis among younger and more liberal participants and predicted self-diagnosis independently of formal diagnosis. Implications for the surge in self-diagnosis and concerns about pathologization of everyday life are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
State-level variation in the prevalence of child psychopathology symptoms in the US: Results from the ABCD study Perceptions around occupational mental well-being of community health workers and an intervention package for its promotion: A mixed-methods study in rural Chiapas, Mexico The ties that bind: Understanding the mental health consequences of the Windrush Scandal and hostile immigration policies on survivors in the UK Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce Understanding depression and the PHQ-9 items among people living with HIV: A multiple methods qualitative study in Yaoundé, Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1