评估用于修复已切除牙髓的原切牙的不同桩核系统:体外研究

Mohamed Elfatih Mansour, Ahmed Hamdy Wahba, Abeer Abdellatif, I. Elkalla
{"title":"评估用于修复已切除牙髓的原切牙的不同桩核系统:体外研究","authors":"Mohamed Elfatih Mansour, Ahmed Hamdy Wahba, Abeer Abdellatif, I. Elkalla","doi":"10.21608/asdj.2024.271877.1218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim : This in-vitro study was conducted to assess the fracture resistance (FR) of different post and core systems for restoring pulpectomized primary incisors. Materials and methods : Forty extracted primary incisors were collected, prepared, and then obturated using Metapex. Teeth were allocated into four groups. Group (A): teeth restored with human dentin posts; Group (B): bovine dentin posts; Group (C): glass fiber posts; and Group (D): orthodontic stainless-steel wire in omega-form posts. Dentin blocks were obtained from the roots of extracted human maxillary premolars and bovine permanent incisors to fabricate the dentin posts. These blocks were formed into post shapes using a Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine. The posts underwent cementation using glass ionomer cement, followed by coronal buildup with composite. After thermocycling, the FR and mode of failure were examined. The FR was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while the mode of failure was analyzed using the Monte Carlo test. P-values ≤ 0.05 were used to determine statistical significance. Results : The median maximum compressive load in group (A) was 386.87 N, in group (B) it was 379.27 N, in group (C) it was 522.16 N, and in group (D) it was 469.14 N. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant regarding the maximum compressive load and the failure mode. Conclusion : Glass fiber posts and omega posts had higher FR compared to dentin posts, although the four groups can be used effectively for restoring pulpectomized primary incisors.","PeriodicalId":505319,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","volume":"33 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Different Post and Core Systems for Restoring Pulpectomized Primary Incisors: An In-Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Elfatih Mansour, Ahmed Hamdy Wahba, Abeer Abdellatif, I. Elkalla\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/asdj.2024.271877.1218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim : This in-vitro study was conducted to assess the fracture resistance (FR) of different post and core systems for restoring pulpectomized primary incisors. Materials and methods : Forty extracted primary incisors were collected, prepared, and then obturated using Metapex. Teeth were allocated into four groups. Group (A): teeth restored with human dentin posts; Group (B): bovine dentin posts; Group (C): glass fiber posts; and Group (D): orthodontic stainless-steel wire in omega-form posts. Dentin blocks were obtained from the roots of extracted human maxillary premolars and bovine permanent incisors to fabricate the dentin posts. These blocks were formed into post shapes using a Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine. The posts underwent cementation using glass ionomer cement, followed by coronal buildup with composite. After thermocycling, the FR and mode of failure were examined. The FR was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while the mode of failure was analyzed using the Monte Carlo test. P-values ≤ 0.05 were used to determine statistical significance. Results : The median maximum compressive load in group (A) was 386.87 N, in group (B) it was 379.27 N, in group (C) it was 522.16 N, and in group (D) it was 469.14 N. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant regarding the maximum compressive load and the failure mode. Conclusion : Glass fiber posts and omega posts had higher FR compared to dentin posts, although the four groups can be used effectively for restoring pulpectomized primary incisors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2024.271877.1218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2024.271877.1218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本项体外研究旨在评估不同桩核系统的抗折性(FR),以修复脉冲切除的原切牙。材料和方法 :收集、制备 40 颗拔除的原切牙,然后使用 Metapex 进行钝化。牙齿被分为四组。A组:用人牙本质柱修复的牙齿;B组:用牛牙本质柱修复的牙齿;C组:用玻璃纤维柱修复的牙齿;D组:用Ω形不锈钢丝修复的牙齿。从拔出的人类上颌前臼齿和牛永久切牙的根部获得牙本质块,用于制作牙本质柱。使用计算机数控(CNC)机器将这些牙本质块制成牙柱形状。使用玻璃离子粘结剂粘结牙柱,然后用复合材料粘结冠面。热循环后,检查了破坏力和破坏模式。FR 采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行分析,而失效模式则采用 Monte Carlo 检验进行分析。用 P 值≤ 0.05 来确定统计意义。结果:A 组的最大压缩载荷中值为 386.87 N,B 组为 379.27 N,C 组为 522.16 N,D 组为 469.14 N。结论:与牙本质柱相比,玻璃纤维柱和欧米茄柱具有更高的破坏力,尽管这四组柱可以有效地用于修复脉冲切除的主切牙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Different Post and Core Systems for Restoring Pulpectomized Primary Incisors: An In-Vitro Study
Aim : This in-vitro study was conducted to assess the fracture resistance (FR) of different post and core systems for restoring pulpectomized primary incisors. Materials and methods : Forty extracted primary incisors were collected, prepared, and then obturated using Metapex. Teeth were allocated into four groups. Group (A): teeth restored with human dentin posts; Group (B): bovine dentin posts; Group (C): glass fiber posts; and Group (D): orthodontic stainless-steel wire in omega-form posts. Dentin blocks were obtained from the roots of extracted human maxillary premolars and bovine permanent incisors to fabricate the dentin posts. These blocks were formed into post shapes using a Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine. The posts underwent cementation using glass ionomer cement, followed by coronal buildup with composite. After thermocycling, the FR and mode of failure were examined. The FR was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while the mode of failure was analyzed using the Monte Carlo test. P-values ≤ 0.05 were used to determine statistical significance. Results : The median maximum compressive load in group (A) was 386.87 N, in group (B) it was 379.27 N, in group (C) it was 522.16 N, and in group (D) it was 469.14 N. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant regarding the maximum compressive load and the failure mode. Conclusion : Glass fiber posts and omega posts had higher FR compared to dentin posts, although the four groups can be used effectively for restoring pulpectomized primary incisors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Dental Stone Fluidity Properties, Compatibility with Impression Materials, and Detail Reproduction after Incorporation of 0.2% Chlorhexidine Solution Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of two Resilient Attachments Retaining Mandibular Over-Denture Supported by Implant and Natural Tooth on the Supporting Structures Evaluation of Different Post and Core Systems for Restoring Pulpectomized Primary Incisors: An In-Vitro Study A Cross-Sectional Study on the Impact of Children's Intelligence Quotient on Their Behavior and Anxiety in a Dental Setting Erythropoietin Gel as an adjunct to Xenograft in the Surgical Management of Intrabony Periodontal Defects :A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1