每针打结数、打结技术和缝合线类型对悬吊固定纽扣手术强度特性的影响

{"title":"每针打结数、打结技术和缝合线类型对悬吊固定纽扣手术强度特性的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies of the cortical suspensory button (CSB) implant have analyzed fixation strength as a function of suture type and surgical technique, but knot configuration remains an area of interest. This study investigates 4-strand knot configurations in CSB suspensory fixation, specifically comparing the use of 2 separate knots with a single knot. We hypothesize that using 2 knots on the distal side of the CSB with #2 suture will yield the strongest and stiffest suspensory fixation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two types of knot configurations were compared: a single knot with all 4 suture strands versus 2 independent knots with 2 suture strands each (1 knot from inner strands and 1 knot from outer strands). They were tested using #2 or 2-0 suture, and at distal (on top of the button) or proximal (underneath the button) knot positions. Mechanical testing on the Instron measured ultimate failure load, elongation at failure, and stiffness. Statistical analyses (Shapiro-Wilk, unpaired Student’s <em>t</em>-tests, and Chi-square tests) assessed differences in strength, stiffness, elongation, and failure mode between knot configurations within each CSB construct combination.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With #2 suture, 2 knots across the CSB resulted in higher load to failure compared to 1 knot in both proximal (467.00 N vs. 554.66 N, <em>P</em> = .026) and distal (395.18 N vs. 526.51 N, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) locations. Furthermore, 2 knots provided higher stiffness than 1 knot in both proximal (53.24 N/mm vs. 67.89 N/mm, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and distal (47.08 N/mm vs. 56.73 N/mm, <em>P</em> = .041) knot locations. However, using 2-0 suture showed no significant differences in failure load and stiffness regardless of knot location.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using #2 suture and tying 2 independent knots across the CSB increased load to failure and stiffness compared to using only 1 knot regardless of knot position. Thus, if using #2 suture, it is recommended to tie 2 knots to enhance construct strength. However, with 2-0 suture, the number of knots did not impact construct strength. Therefore, if using 2-0 suture, 1 knot can be used to save time. Knot position did not significantly affect the strength or stiffness of the CSB construct, emphasizing the importance of considering knot prominence and surgical approach for determining knot location.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 424-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000816/pdfft?md5=5406db80531838d6ecec199b6dc1b146&pid=1-s2.0-S2666639124000816-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of number of knots per throw, knot technique, and suture type on strength properties of suspensory fixation button surgical procedures\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies of the cortical suspensory button (CSB) implant have analyzed fixation strength as a function of suture type and surgical technique, but knot configuration remains an area of interest. This study investigates 4-strand knot configurations in CSB suspensory fixation, specifically comparing the use of 2 separate knots with a single knot. We hypothesize that using 2 knots on the distal side of the CSB with #2 suture will yield the strongest and stiffest suspensory fixation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two types of knot configurations were compared: a single knot with all 4 suture strands versus 2 independent knots with 2 suture strands each (1 knot from inner strands and 1 knot from outer strands). They were tested using #2 or 2-0 suture, and at distal (on top of the button) or proximal (underneath the button) knot positions. Mechanical testing on the Instron measured ultimate failure load, elongation at failure, and stiffness. Statistical analyses (Shapiro-Wilk, unpaired Student’s <em>t</em>-tests, and Chi-square tests) assessed differences in strength, stiffness, elongation, and failure mode between knot configurations within each CSB construct combination.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With #2 suture, 2 knots across the CSB resulted in higher load to failure compared to 1 knot in both proximal (467.00 N vs. 554.66 N, <em>P</em> = .026) and distal (395.18 N vs. 526.51 N, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) locations. Furthermore, 2 knots provided higher stiffness than 1 knot in both proximal (53.24 N/mm vs. 67.89 N/mm, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and distal (47.08 N/mm vs. 56.73 N/mm, <em>P</em> = .041) knot locations. However, using 2-0 suture showed no significant differences in failure load and stiffness regardless of knot location.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using #2 suture and tying 2 independent knots across the CSB increased load to failure and stiffness compared to using only 1 knot regardless of knot position. Thus, if using #2 suture, it is recommended to tie 2 knots to enhance construct strength. However, with 2-0 suture, the number of knots did not impact construct strength. Therefore, if using 2-0 suture, 1 knot can be used to save time. Knot position did not significantly affect the strength or stiffness of the CSB construct, emphasizing the importance of considering knot prominence and surgical approach for determining knot location.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 424-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000816/pdfft?md5=5406db80531838d6ecec199b6dc1b146&pid=1-s2.0-S2666639124000816-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景以前对皮质悬吊扣(CSB)植入物的研究分析了固定强度与缝合类型和手术技术的关系,但绳结配置仍是一个值得关注的领域。本研究调查了 CSB 悬吊固定中的 4 股绳结配置,特别是比较了使用 2 个独立绳结和使用 1 个绳结的情况。我们假设,在 CSB 远侧使用 2 号缝线打 2 个结将产生最强、最硬的悬吊固定。方法比较了两种结配置:带有全部 4 股缝线的单一结和带有 2 股缝线的 2 个独立结(1 个结来自内侧缝线,1 个结来自外侧缝线)。测试中使用了 2 号或 2-0 号缝线,打结位置为远端(在纽扣顶部)或近端(在纽扣下方)。在 Instron 上进行的机械测试测量了最终失效载荷、失效伸长率和刚度。统计分析(Shapiro-Wilk、非配对学生 t 检验和 Chi-square 检验)评估了每种 CSB 结构组合中不同绳结配置在强度、刚度、伸长率和失效模式方面的差异。结果对于 2 号缝合线,在近端(467.00 N vs. 554.66 N,P = .026)和远端(395.18 N vs. 526.51 N,P <.001)位置,CSB 上的 2 个结比 1 个结的失效载荷更高。此外,在近端(53.24 N/mm vs. 67.89 N/mm,P = .001)和远端(47.08 N/mm vs. 56.73 N/mm,P = .041)打结位置,2 个结比 1 个结提供更高的硬度。结论 使用 2 号缝线并在 CSB 上打 2 个独立的结,与只使用 1 个结相比,无论结的位置如何,都会增加失效载荷和刚度。因此,如果使用 2 号缝合线,建议打 2 个结,以增强构造强度。然而,使用 2-0 号缝合线时,打结的数量并不影响构造强度。因此,如果使用 2-0 号缝合线,可以打 1 个结,以节省时间。结的位置对 CSB 结构的强度和刚度没有明显影响,这强调了考虑结的突出度和手术方法对确定结位置的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of number of knots per throw, knot technique, and suture type on strength properties of suspensory fixation button surgical procedures

Background

Previous studies of the cortical suspensory button (CSB) implant have analyzed fixation strength as a function of suture type and surgical technique, but knot configuration remains an area of interest. This study investigates 4-strand knot configurations in CSB suspensory fixation, specifically comparing the use of 2 separate knots with a single knot. We hypothesize that using 2 knots on the distal side of the CSB with #2 suture will yield the strongest and stiffest suspensory fixation.

Methods

Two types of knot configurations were compared: a single knot with all 4 suture strands versus 2 independent knots with 2 suture strands each (1 knot from inner strands and 1 knot from outer strands). They were tested using #2 or 2-0 suture, and at distal (on top of the button) or proximal (underneath the button) knot positions. Mechanical testing on the Instron measured ultimate failure load, elongation at failure, and stiffness. Statistical analyses (Shapiro-Wilk, unpaired Student’s t-tests, and Chi-square tests) assessed differences in strength, stiffness, elongation, and failure mode between knot configurations within each CSB construct combination.

Results

With #2 suture, 2 knots across the CSB resulted in higher load to failure compared to 1 knot in both proximal (467.00 N vs. 554.66 N, P = .026) and distal (395.18 N vs. 526.51 N, P < .001) locations. Furthermore, 2 knots provided higher stiffness than 1 knot in both proximal (53.24 N/mm vs. 67.89 N/mm, P < .001) and distal (47.08 N/mm vs. 56.73 N/mm, P = .041) knot locations. However, using 2-0 suture showed no significant differences in failure load and stiffness regardless of knot location.

Conclusion

Using #2 suture and tying 2 independent knots across the CSB increased load to failure and stiffness compared to using only 1 knot regardless of knot position. Thus, if using #2 suture, it is recommended to tie 2 knots to enhance construct strength. However, with 2-0 suture, the number of knots did not impact construct strength. Therefore, if using 2-0 suture, 1 knot can be used to save time. Knot position did not significantly affect the strength or stiffness of the CSB construct, emphasizing the importance of considering knot prominence and surgical approach for determining knot location.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Long head of biceps tendon management in the setting of massive rotator cuff tears Glenohumeral capsular injury rate in patients with glenohumeral instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis The effect of preemptive middle glenohumeral ligament release, following release of the rotator interval and coracohumeral ligament, in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of small- to medium-sized tears to prevent postoperative stiffness: a retrospective comparative study Arthroscopic reduction internal fixation for displaced radial head fractures: a systematic review of the outcomes and complications Variability of rehabilitation protocols for ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture tape augmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1