作为空气污染主动生物监测器的苔藓袋:理解现状、应用和关注问题

Sriroop Chaudhuri, Mimi Roy
{"title":"作为空气污染主动生物监测器的苔藓袋:理解现状、应用和关注问题","authors":"Sriroop Chaudhuri, Mimi Roy","doi":"10.46488/nept.2024.v23i02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dual concerns involving the rise in airborne pollutant levels and bulging need to protect-preserve human health have propelled the search for innovative means for air quality monitoring to aid in evidence-based decision-making (pollution prevention-mitigation). In this regard, moss bags have gathered a great deal of attention as active biomonitors. In this reflective discourse, we systematically review the world literature to present a bird’s eye view of moss bag applications and advances while highlighting potential concerns. We begin with a brief note on mosses as biomonitors, highlighting the advantages of moss bags over the passive technique (native moss), other living organisms (lichens, vascular plants), and instrument-based measurements. A major strand of moss bag research involves urban ecosystem sustainability studies (e.g., street tunnels and canyons, parks), while others include event-specific monitoring and change detection (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 Lockdown), indoor-outdoor air quality assessment, and change detection in land use patterns. Recent advances include biomagnetic studies, radioisotopic investigations, and mobile applications. Efforts are currently underway to couple moss bag results with a suite of indicators [e.g., relative accumulation factor (RAF), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), enrichment factor (EF)] and spatially map the results for holistic appraisal of environmental quality (hot spot detection). However, while moss bag innovations and applications continue to grow over time, we point to fundamental concerns/uncertainties (e.g., lack of concordance in operational procedures and parameterization, ideal species selection, moss vitality) that still need to be addressed by targeted case studies, before the moss results could be considered in regulatory interventions.","PeriodicalId":18783,"journal":{"name":"Nature Environment and Pollution Technology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moss Bags as Active Biomonitors of Air Pollution: Current State of Understanding, Applications and Concerns\",\"authors\":\"Sriroop Chaudhuri, Mimi Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.46488/nept.2024.v23i02.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dual concerns involving the rise in airborne pollutant levels and bulging need to protect-preserve human health have propelled the search for innovative means for air quality monitoring to aid in evidence-based decision-making (pollution prevention-mitigation). In this regard, moss bags have gathered a great deal of attention as active biomonitors. In this reflective discourse, we systematically review the world literature to present a bird’s eye view of moss bag applications and advances while highlighting potential concerns. We begin with a brief note on mosses as biomonitors, highlighting the advantages of moss bags over the passive technique (native moss), other living organisms (lichens, vascular plants), and instrument-based measurements. A major strand of moss bag research involves urban ecosystem sustainability studies (e.g., street tunnels and canyons, parks), while others include event-specific monitoring and change detection (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 Lockdown), indoor-outdoor air quality assessment, and change detection in land use patterns. Recent advances include biomagnetic studies, radioisotopic investigations, and mobile applications. Efforts are currently underway to couple moss bag results with a suite of indicators [e.g., relative accumulation factor (RAF), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), enrichment factor (EF)] and spatially map the results for holistic appraisal of environmental quality (hot spot detection). However, while moss bag innovations and applications continue to grow over time, we point to fundamental concerns/uncertainties (e.g., lack of concordance in operational procedures and parameterization, ideal species selection, moss vitality) that still need to be addressed by targeted case studies, before the moss results could be considered in regulatory interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Environment and Pollution Technology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Environment and Pollution Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46488/nept.2024.v23i02.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Environment and Pollution Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46488/nept.2024.v23i02.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空气中污染物水平的上升和保护人类健康的迫切需求,这两方面的问题推动了人们寻找空气质量监测的创新方法,以帮助做出以证据为基础的决策(污染预防-缓解)。在这方面,苔藓袋作为活性生物监测器受到了广泛关注。在这篇反思性论文中,我们系统地回顾了世界文献,鸟瞰了苔藓袋的应用和进展,同时强调了潜在的问题。我们首先简要介绍了作为生物监测器的苔藓,强调了苔藓袋相对于被动技术(本地苔藓)、其他生物(地衣、维管束植物)和仪器测量的优势。苔藓袋研究的一个主要分支涉及城市生态系统可持续性研究(如街道隧道和峡谷、公园),其他分支包括特定事件监测和变化探测(如 SARS-CoV-2 封锁)、室内外空气质量评估和土地利用模式变化探测。最新进展包括生物磁研究、放射性同位素调查和移动应用。目前正在努力将苔藓袋的结果与一系列指标[如相对累积因子 (RAF)、污染因子 (CF)、污染负荷指数 (PLI)、富集因子 (EF)]结合起来,并将结果绘制成空间地图,以便对环境质量进行整体评估(热点检测)。不过,虽然苔藓袋的创新和应用随着时间的推移不断增加,但我们指出了一些基本问题/不确定性(例如,操作程序和参数化、理想物种选择、苔藓活力等方面缺乏一致性),这些问题仍需通过有针对性的案例研究加以解决,然后才能考虑将苔藓结果用于监管干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moss Bags as Active Biomonitors of Air Pollution: Current State of Understanding, Applications and Concerns
Dual concerns involving the rise in airborne pollutant levels and bulging need to protect-preserve human health have propelled the search for innovative means for air quality monitoring to aid in evidence-based decision-making (pollution prevention-mitigation). In this regard, moss bags have gathered a great deal of attention as active biomonitors. In this reflective discourse, we systematically review the world literature to present a bird’s eye view of moss bag applications and advances while highlighting potential concerns. We begin with a brief note on mosses as biomonitors, highlighting the advantages of moss bags over the passive technique (native moss), other living organisms (lichens, vascular plants), and instrument-based measurements. A major strand of moss bag research involves urban ecosystem sustainability studies (e.g., street tunnels and canyons, parks), while others include event-specific monitoring and change detection (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 Lockdown), indoor-outdoor air quality assessment, and change detection in land use patterns. Recent advances include biomagnetic studies, radioisotopic investigations, and mobile applications. Efforts are currently underway to couple moss bag results with a suite of indicators [e.g., relative accumulation factor (RAF), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), enrichment factor (EF)] and spatially map the results for holistic appraisal of environmental quality (hot spot detection). However, while moss bag innovations and applications continue to grow over time, we point to fundamental concerns/uncertainties (e.g., lack of concordance in operational procedures and parameterization, ideal species selection, moss vitality) that still need to be addressed by targeted case studies, before the moss results could be considered in regulatory interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Environment and Pollution Technology
Nature Environment and Pollution Technology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal was established initially by the name of Journal of Environment and Pollution in 1994, whose name was later changed to Nature Environment and Pollution Technology in the year 2002. It has now become an open access online journal from the year 2017 with ISSN: 2395-3454 (Online). The journal was established especially to promote the cause for environment and to cater the need for rapid dissemination of the vast scientific and technological data generated in this field. It is a part of many reputed international indexing and abstracting agencies. The Journal has evoked a highly encouraging response among the researchers, scientists and technocrats. It has a reputed International Editorial Board and publishes peer reviewed papers. The Journal has also been approved by UGC (India). The journal publishes both original research and review papers. The ideology and scope of the Journal includes the following. -Monitoring, control and management of air, water, soil and noise pollution -Solid waste management -Industrial hygiene and occupational health -Biomedical aspects of pollution -Toxicological studies -Radioactive pollution and radiation effects -Wastewater treatment and recycling etc. -Environmental modelling -Biodiversity and conservation -Dynamics and behaviour of chemicals in environment -Natural resources, wildlife, forests and wetlands etc. -Environmental laws and legal aspects -Environmental economics -Any other topic related to environment
期刊最新文献
Optimization of Aviation Biofuel Development as Sustainable Energy Through Simulation of System Dynamics Modeling Evaluation of Grid-Based Aridity Indices in Classifying Aridity Zones in Iraq Elucidating Mycotoxin-Producing Aspergillus Species in River Water: An Advanced Molecular Diagnostic Study for the Assessment of Ecological Health and Contamination Risk Heavy Metal Concentration in Fish Species Clarias gariepinus (Catfish) and Oreochromis niloticus (Nile Tilapia) from Anambra River, Nigeria Impact of Hydraulic Developments on the Quality of Surface Water in the Mafragh Watershed, El Tarf, Algeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1