古代时间哲学批判下的麦克塔格特丛书

Pantelis Golitsis
{"title":"古代时间哲学批判下的麦克塔格特丛书","authors":"Pantelis Golitsis","doi":"10.1353/rvm.2024.a929311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: McTaggart’s thesis about the unreality of time has puzzled and still puzzles philosophers of the metaphysics of time, who defend the existence of either McTaggart’s A series or McTaggart’s B series. McTaggart himself, however, was led through his analysis to view as real what he called the “C series,” which, unlike the temporal A and B series, is atemporal. The author argues that the ancient conception of time, especially of the Neoplatonist Damascius, reveals an important gap in McTaggart’s thought, namely, his overlooking the idea of an integral present (that is, a present that does not form a series), which allows to account for the B series as being generated from the C series without the involvement of the A series, which has been shown by McTaggart to have a contradictory nature. This comparative account enables us to see not only that Damascius was the first presentist in the history of the metaphysics of time, but also that McTaggart’s analysis rests upon the unreflected assumption that time, if it is real, progresses linearly.","PeriodicalId":507479,"journal":{"name":"The Review of Metaphysics","volume":"35 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"McTaggart’s Series under the Critical Eye of the Ancient Philosophy of Time\",\"authors\":\"Pantelis Golitsis\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rvm.2024.a929311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: McTaggart’s thesis about the unreality of time has puzzled and still puzzles philosophers of the metaphysics of time, who defend the existence of either McTaggart’s A series or McTaggart’s B series. McTaggart himself, however, was led through his analysis to view as real what he called the “C series,” which, unlike the temporal A and B series, is atemporal. The author argues that the ancient conception of time, especially of the Neoplatonist Damascius, reveals an important gap in McTaggart’s thought, namely, his overlooking the idea of an integral present (that is, a present that does not form a series), which allows to account for the B series as being generated from the C series without the involvement of the A series, which has been shown by McTaggart to have a contradictory nature. This comparative account enables us to see not only that Damascius was the first presentist in the history of the metaphysics of time, but also that McTaggart’s analysis rests upon the unreflected assumption that time, if it is real, progresses linearly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Review of Metaphysics\",\"volume\":\"35 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Review of Metaphysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rvm.2024.a929311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Review of Metaphysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rvm.2024.a929311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:麦克塔格特关于时间非现实性的论断曾经并仍然困惑着时间形而上学的哲学家们,他们为麦克塔格特的 A 系列或麦克塔格特的 B 系列的存在进行辩护。然而,麦克塔格特本人却通过分析,将他所称的 "C 系列 "视为真实的,它与时间性的 A 系列和 B 系列不同,是无时间性的。作者认为,古代的时间概念,尤其是新柏拉图主义者大马士革的时间概念,揭示了麦克塔格特思想中的一个重要缺陷,即他忽略了一个整体的现在(即不形成系列的现在)的概念,而这个概念可以解释 B 系列是由 C 系列产生的,不需要 A 系列的参与,而 A 系列已被麦克塔格特证明具有矛盾的性质。通过这种比较说明,我们不仅可以看到大马士革是时间形而上学史上第一个现在论者,而且还可以看到麦克塔格特的分析建立在一个未经反思的假设之上,即时间(如果它是真实的)是线性发展的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
McTaggart’s Series under the Critical Eye of the Ancient Philosophy of Time
Abstract: McTaggart’s thesis about the unreality of time has puzzled and still puzzles philosophers of the metaphysics of time, who defend the existence of either McTaggart’s A series or McTaggart’s B series. McTaggart himself, however, was led through his analysis to view as real what he called the “C series,” which, unlike the temporal A and B series, is atemporal. The author argues that the ancient conception of time, especially of the Neoplatonist Damascius, reveals an important gap in McTaggart’s thought, namely, his overlooking the idea of an integral present (that is, a present that does not form a series), which allows to account for the B series as being generated from the C series without the involvement of the A series, which has been shown by McTaggart to have a contradictory nature. This comparative account enables us to see not only that Damascius was the first presentist in the history of the metaphysics of time, but also that McTaggart’s analysis rests upon the unreflected assumption that time, if it is real, progresses linearly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plotinus and the Augustine on the Mid-Rank of the Soul: Navigating Two Worlds by Joseph Torchia (review) Time’s Causal Power: Proclus and the Natural Theology of Time by Antonio Luis Costa Vargas (review) The Metaphysics of Practice: Writings on Action, Community, and Obligation by Wilfrid Sellars (review) Free Will’s Value: Criminal Justice, Pride, and Love by John Lemos (review) The Politics of Attention and the Promise of Mindfulness by Lawrence Berger (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1