利用粘弹性分流器-酸系统有效刺激有限进入层油井

C. Carpenter
{"title":"利用粘弹性分流器-酸系统有效刺激有限进入层油井","authors":"C. Carpenter","doi":"10.2118/0624-0058-jpt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 213785, “Effective Stimulation of a Limited-Entry-Liner Well Using a Leading Viscoelastic Diverter-Acid System,” by Timothy I. Morrow, SPE, and Ahmed M. Fawzy, ADNOC, and Abraham Ryan, SPE, SLB, et al. The paper has not been peer reviewed.\n \n \n \n A horizontal water-injection well with a limited-entry-liner (LEL) completion in an onshore Middle East carbonate reservoir was stimulated with hydrochloric acid (HCl) using a large volume of a viscoelastic diverter-acid (VEDA) fluid system ahead of the main acid stage. The VEDA stage was needed to deliver sufficient acid volumes to the toe of the well, resulting in a significant increase to the injectivity index and more-even distribution of injected water across the horizontal drain.\n \n \n \n The LEL is a lower completion type designed for openhole wells. It consists of an array of small, unevenly spaced holes placed along a string of blank pipes. Swell packers typically are placed along the LEL completion to divide the lateral into compartments. The size of the LEL holes usually is in the range of 3–6 mm. The LEL completion provides the capability to perform acid stimulation by bullheading at high pumping rates, and the distribution of the holes serves to provide a type of mechanical diversion of the stimulation fluids. A simplified schematic of the LEL concept is shown in Fig. 1. The properties of the LEL used in this study include the following:\n - Hole spacing broadly is within the design range of 40–60 ft\n - Average compartment length is within the design range of 500–1,000 ft\n - A significant permeability contrast exists between the heel (Aones 1 and 2) and the toe (Aones 4 and 5).\n The total injection interval for this well is 4,075 ft. Because of the large permeability contrast between the heel and toe, however, it is possible that a bullhead acid stimulation may result in a relatively small volume of acid entering the toe compartments.\n \n \n \n The acid stimulation for this well consisted of 42 gal/ft of 15% HCl to be pumped at the maximum allowable rate. Acid stimulation treatment modeling was performed for the following three scenarios:\n - A hypothetical scenario of 15% HCl pumped into an openhole completion\n - The baseline scenario of 15% HCl without any VEDA stages pumped into the LEL\n - An alternate scenario in which a VEDA stage is added to the beginning of the acid package and pumped into the LEL\n The purpose of modeling the hypothetical scenario was to illustrate the mechanical diversion provided by the LEL.\n For a hypothetical openhole completion, a bullhead acid stimulation at maximum allowable pumping rate was predicted to place very little acid into Zone 5 at the toe of the well. Conversely, the higher-permeability heel Zones 1 and 2 would take most of the acid (approximately 80%), with Zones 3 and 4 receiving just 20%. By comparing the simulation results between Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, the mechanical diversion effect of the LEL completion could be estimated. After adding the LEL configuration to the stimulation model, the model was calibrated with production-logging-tool (PLT) data acquired from the well during the prestimulation injection period.\n","PeriodicalId":16720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited-Entry-Liner Well Stimulated Effectively With a Viscoelastic Diverter-Acid System\",\"authors\":\"C. Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/0624-0058-jpt\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 213785, “Effective Stimulation of a Limited-Entry-Liner Well Using a Leading Viscoelastic Diverter-Acid System,” by Timothy I. Morrow, SPE, and Ahmed M. Fawzy, ADNOC, and Abraham Ryan, SPE, SLB, et al. The paper has not been peer reviewed.\\n \\n \\n \\n A horizontal water-injection well with a limited-entry-liner (LEL) completion in an onshore Middle East carbonate reservoir was stimulated with hydrochloric acid (HCl) using a large volume of a viscoelastic diverter-acid (VEDA) fluid system ahead of the main acid stage. The VEDA stage was needed to deliver sufficient acid volumes to the toe of the well, resulting in a significant increase to the injectivity index and more-even distribution of injected water across the horizontal drain.\\n \\n \\n \\n The LEL is a lower completion type designed for openhole wells. It consists of an array of small, unevenly spaced holes placed along a string of blank pipes. Swell packers typically are placed along the LEL completion to divide the lateral into compartments. The size of the LEL holes usually is in the range of 3–6 mm. The LEL completion provides the capability to perform acid stimulation by bullheading at high pumping rates, and the distribution of the holes serves to provide a type of mechanical diversion of the stimulation fluids. A simplified schematic of the LEL concept is shown in Fig. 1. The properties of the LEL used in this study include the following:\\n - Hole spacing broadly is within the design range of 40–60 ft\\n - Average compartment length is within the design range of 500–1,000 ft\\n - A significant permeability contrast exists between the heel (Aones 1 and 2) and the toe (Aones 4 and 5).\\n The total injection interval for this well is 4,075 ft. Because of the large permeability contrast between the heel and toe, however, it is possible that a bullhead acid stimulation may result in a relatively small volume of acid entering the toe compartments.\\n \\n \\n \\n The acid stimulation for this well consisted of 42 gal/ft of 15% HCl to be pumped at the maximum allowable rate. Acid stimulation treatment modeling was performed for the following three scenarios:\\n - A hypothetical scenario of 15% HCl pumped into an openhole completion\\n - The baseline scenario of 15% HCl without any VEDA stages pumped into the LEL\\n - An alternate scenario in which a VEDA stage is added to the beginning of the acid package and pumped into the LEL\\n The purpose of modeling the hypothetical scenario was to illustrate the mechanical diversion provided by the LEL.\\n For a hypothetical openhole completion, a bullhead acid stimulation at maximum allowable pumping rate was predicted to place very little acid into Zone 5 at the toe of the well. Conversely, the higher-permeability heel Zones 1 and 2 would take most of the acid (approximately 80%), with Zones 3 and 4 receiving just 20%. By comparing the simulation results between Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, the mechanical diversion effect of the LEL completion could be estimated. After adding the LEL configuration to the stimulation model, the model was calibrated with production-logging-tool (PLT) data acquired from the well during the prestimulation injection period.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/0624-0058-jpt\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/0624-0058-jpt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文由JPT技术编辑Chris Carpenter撰写,收录了SPE 213785号论文 "使用前导粘弹性分流器-酸系统有效刺激限入套管井 "的要点,作者为Timothy I. Morrow, SPE和Ahmed M. Fawzy, ADNOC以及Abraham Ryan, SPE, SLB等。 中东陆上碳酸盐岩储层中的一口水平注水井采用有限进入层(LEL)完井,在主酸阶段之前使用大量粘弹性分流-酸(VEDA)流体系统进行盐酸(HCl)刺激。VEDA 阶段需要将足够的酸量输送到井口,从而显著提高注入指数,并使注入水在水平排水管中的分布更加均匀。 LEL 是一种专为裸眼井设计的下部完井类型。它由沿一串空管放置的间距不均的小孔阵列组成。通常沿 LEL 完井放置膨胀封隔器,以将横向分成若干区块。LEL 孔的大小通常在 3-6 毫米之间。LEL 完井可通过高抽速牛头钻进进行酸性注水,钻孔的分布可对注水流体进行机械分流。图 1 是 LEL 概念的简化示意图。本研究中使用的 LEL 具有以下特性:- 井眼间距大致在 40-60 英尺的设计范围内 - 平均隔层长度在 500-1,000 英尺的设计范围内 - 在井跟(1 号和 2 号注水层)和井趾(4 号和 5 号注水层)之间存在明显的渗透率对比。这口井的总注入间隔为 4,075 英尺。然而,由于跟部和趾部之间的渗透率反差较大,牛头酸化可能会导致进入趾部隔室的酸量相对较小。 这口井的酸激励包括以最大允许速率泵送 42 加仑/英尺的 15% HCl。针对以下三种情况进行了酸激励处理建模:- 假设情况下,15% HCl 被泵入裸眼完井 - 基准情况下,15% HCl 没有任何 VEDA 级被泵入 LEL - 备选情况下,VEDA 级被添加到酸液包的开头并被泵入 LEL。对于假设的裸眼完井,预计以最大允许抽速进行牛头酸激励时,进入井口 5 区的酸很少。相反,渗透率较高的跟部 1 区和 2 区将吸收大部分酸液(约 80%),而 3 区和 4 区仅吸收 20%。通过比较方案 1 和方案 2 的模拟结果,可以估算出 LEL 完井的机械分流效果。将 LEL 配置添加到激励模型中后,利用在预激励注入期间从油井获取的生产记录工具 (PLT) 数据对模型进行校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Limited-Entry-Liner Well Stimulated Effectively With a Viscoelastic Diverter-Acid System
This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 213785, “Effective Stimulation of a Limited-Entry-Liner Well Using a Leading Viscoelastic Diverter-Acid System,” by Timothy I. Morrow, SPE, and Ahmed M. Fawzy, ADNOC, and Abraham Ryan, SPE, SLB, et al. The paper has not been peer reviewed. A horizontal water-injection well with a limited-entry-liner (LEL) completion in an onshore Middle East carbonate reservoir was stimulated with hydrochloric acid (HCl) using a large volume of a viscoelastic diverter-acid (VEDA) fluid system ahead of the main acid stage. The VEDA stage was needed to deliver sufficient acid volumes to the toe of the well, resulting in a significant increase to the injectivity index and more-even distribution of injected water across the horizontal drain. The LEL is a lower completion type designed for openhole wells. It consists of an array of small, unevenly spaced holes placed along a string of blank pipes. Swell packers typically are placed along the LEL completion to divide the lateral into compartments. The size of the LEL holes usually is in the range of 3–6 mm. The LEL completion provides the capability to perform acid stimulation by bullheading at high pumping rates, and the distribution of the holes serves to provide a type of mechanical diversion of the stimulation fluids. A simplified schematic of the LEL concept is shown in Fig. 1. The properties of the LEL used in this study include the following: - Hole spacing broadly is within the design range of 40–60 ft - Average compartment length is within the design range of 500–1,000 ft - A significant permeability contrast exists between the heel (Aones 1 and 2) and the toe (Aones 4 and 5). The total injection interval for this well is 4,075 ft. Because of the large permeability contrast between the heel and toe, however, it is possible that a bullhead acid stimulation may result in a relatively small volume of acid entering the toe compartments. The acid stimulation for this well consisted of 42 gal/ft of 15% HCl to be pumped at the maximum allowable rate. Acid stimulation treatment modeling was performed for the following three scenarios: - A hypothetical scenario of 15% HCl pumped into an openhole completion - The baseline scenario of 15% HCl without any VEDA stages pumped into the LEL - An alternate scenario in which a VEDA stage is added to the beginning of the acid package and pumped into the LEL The purpose of modeling the hypothetical scenario was to illustrate the mechanical diversion provided by the LEL. For a hypothetical openhole completion, a bullhead acid stimulation at maximum allowable pumping rate was predicted to place very little acid into Zone 5 at the toe of the well. Conversely, the higher-permeability heel Zones 1 and 2 would take most of the acid (approximately 80%), with Zones 3 and 4 receiving just 20%. By comparing the simulation results between Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, the mechanical diversion effect of the LEL completion could be estimated. After adding the LEL configuration to the stimulation model, the model was calibrated with production-logging-tool (PLT) data acquired from the well during the prestimulation injection period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extended Laterals and Hydraulic Fracturing Redevelop Tight Fractured Carbonates Proposed Methods Accelerate Permanent CO2-Storage Process 2024 SPE Pioneers of Improved Oil Recovery What You Don’t Know About Chevron’s New 20K Anchor Project Downhole Hydrogen-Generation System Stimulates Challenging Formations in Kuwait
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1