尺寸分散对晶体纳米粒子 X 射线散射的影响:以 CeO2 为例进行研究。

IF 6.1 3区 材料科学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Journal of Applied Crystallography Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1107/S1600576724003108
Adriana Valério, Fabiane J Trindade, Rafaela F S Penacchio, Bria Cisi, Sérgio Damasceno, Maurício B Estradiote, Cristiane B Rodella, Andre S Ferlauto, Stefan W Kycia, Sérgio L Morelhão
{"title":"尺寸分散对晶体纳米粒子 X 射线散射的影响:以 CeO2 为例进行研究。","authors":"Adriana Valério, Fabiane J Trindade, Rafaela F S Penacchio, Bria Cisi, Sérgio Damasceno, Maurício B Estradiote, Cristiane B Rodella, Andre S Ferlauto, Stefan W Kycia, Sérgio L Morelhão","doi":"10.1107/S1600576724003108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Controlling the shape and size dispersivity and crystallinity of nanoparticles (NPs) has been a challenge in identifying these parameters' role in the physical and chemical properties of NPs. The need for reliable quantitative tools for analyzing the dispersivity and crystallinity of NPs is a considerable problem in optimizing scalable synthesis routes capable of controlling NP properties. The most common tools are electron microscopy (EM) and X-ray scattering techniques. However, each technique has different susceptibility to these parameters, implying that more than one technique is necessary to characterize NP systems with maximum reliability. Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) is mandatory to access information on crystallinity. In contrast, EM or small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is required to access information on whole NP sizes. EM provides average values on relatively small ensembles in contrast to the bulk values accessed by X-ray techniques. Besides the fact that the SAXS and WAXS techniques have different susceptibilities to size distributions, SAXS is easily affected by NP-NP interaction distances. Because of all the variables involved, there have yet to be proposed methodologies for cross-analyzing data from two techniques that can provide reliable quantitative results of dispersivity and crystallinity. In this work, a SAXS/WAXS-based methodology is proposed for simultaneously quantifying size distribution and degree of crystallinity of NPs. The most reliable easy-to-access size result for each technique is demonstrated by computer simulation. Strategies on how to compare these results and how to identify NP-NP interaction effects underneath the SAXS intensity curve are presented. Experimental results are shown for cubic-like CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs. WAXS size results from two analytical procedures are compared, line-profile fitting of individual diffraction peaks in opposition to whole pattern fitting. The impact of shape dispersivity is also evaluated. Extension of the proposed methodology for cross-analyzing EM and WAXS data is possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":14950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Crystallography","volume":"57 Pt 3","pages":"793-807"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of size dispersion on X-ray scattering of crystalline nanoparticles: CeO<sub>2</sub> as a case study.\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Valério, Fabiane J Trindade, Rafaela F S Penacchio, Bria Cisi, Sérgio Damasceno, Maurício B Estradiote, Cristiane B Rodella, Andre S Ferlauto, Stefan W Kycia, Sérgio L Morelhão\",\"doi\":\"10.1107/S1600576724003108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Controlling the shape and size dispersivity and crystallinity of nanoparticles (NPs) has been a challenge in identifying these parameters' role in the physical and chemical properties of NPs. The need for reliable quantitative tools for analyzing the dispersivity and crystallinity of NPs is a considerable problem in optimizing scalable synthesis routes capable of controlling NP properties. The most common tools are electron microscopy (EM) and X-ray scattering techniques. However, each technique has different susceptibility to these parameters, implying that more than one technique is necessary to characterize NP systems with maximum reliability. Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) is mandatory to access information on crystallinity. In contrast, EM or small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is required to access information on whole NP sizes. EM provides average values on relatively small ensembles in contrast to the bulk values accessed by X-ray techniques. Besides the fact that the SAXS and WAXS techniques have different susceptibilities to size distributions, SAXS is easily affected by NP-NP interaction distances. Because of all the variables involved, there have yet to be proposed methodologies for cross-analyzing data from two techniques that can provide reliable quantitative results of dispersivity and crystallinity. In this work, a SAXS/WAXS-based methodology is proposed for simultaneously quantifying size distribution and degree of crystallinity of NPs. The most reliable easy-to-access size result for each technique is demonstrated by computer simulation. Strategies on how to compare these results and how to identify NP-NP interaction effects underneath the SAXS intensity curve are presented. Experimental results are shown for cubic-like CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs. WAXS size results from two analytical procedures are compared, line-profile fitting of individual diffraction peaks in opposition to whole pattern fitting. The impact of shape dispersivity is also evaluated. Extension of the proposed methodology for cross-analyzing EM and WAXS data is possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Crystallography\",\"volume\":\"57 Pt 3\",\"pages\":\"793-807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Crystallography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576724003108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Crystallography","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576724003108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

控制纳米粒子(NPs)的形状和尺寸分散性及结晶度一直是确定这些参数在 NPs 物理和化学特性中的作用所面临的挑战。需要可靠的定量工具来分析 NPs 的分散性和结晶性,这是优化可控制 NP 特性的可扩展合成路线的一个重大问题。最常用的工具是电子显微镜(EM)和 X 射线散射技术。然而,每种技术对这些参数的敏感性不同,这意味着需要一种以上的技术才能以最大的可靠性表征 NP 系统。广角 X 射线散射 (WAXS) 是获取结晶度信息的必备技术。相反,要获取整个 NP 尺寸的信息,则需要 EM 或小角 X 射线散射 (SAXS)。与 X 射线技术获取的整体值相比,EM 可提供相对较小集合的平均值。除了 SAXS 和 WAXS 技术对尺寸分布的敏感性不同之外,SAXS 还容易受到 NP-NP 相互作用距离的影响。由于涉及到所有变量,目前还没有一种方法可用于交叉分析来自两种技术的数据,从而提供可靠的分散性和结晶度定量结果。本研究提出了一种基于 SAXS/WAXS 的方法,用于同时量化 NPs 的尺寸分布和结晶度。通过计算机模拟,证明了每种技术最可靠易得的粒度结果。此外,还介绍了如何比较这些结果以及如何识别 SAXS 强度曲线下的 NP-NP 相互作用效应的策略。实验结果显示的是立方体类 CeO2 NPs。比较了两种分析程序得出的 WAXS 尺寸结果,即单个衍射峰的线轮廓拟合与整个图案拟合。同时还评估了形状分散性的影响。建议的交叉分析电磁和 WAXS 数据的方法可以进行扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implications of size dispersion on X-ray scattering of crystalline nanoparticles: CeO2 as a case study.

Controlling the shape and size dispersivity and crystallinity of nanoparticles (NPs) has been a challenge in identifying these parameters' role in the physical and chemical properties of NPs. The need for reliable quantitative tools for analyzing the dispersivity and crystallinity of NPs is a considerable problem in optimizing scalable synthesis routes capable of controlling NP properties. The most common tools are electron microscopy (EM) and X-ray scattering techniques. However, each technique has different susceptibility to these parameters, implying that more than one technique is necessary to characterize NP systems with maximum reliability. Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) is mandatory to access information on crystallinity. In contrast, EM or small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is required to access information on whole NP sizes. EM provides average values on relatively small ensembles in contrast to the bulk values accessed by X-ray techniques. Besides the fact that the SAXS and WAXS techniques have different susceptibilities to size distributions, SAXS is easily affected by NP-NP interaction distances. Because of all the variables involved, there have yet to be proposed methodologies for cross-analyzing data from two techniques that can provide reliable quantitative results of dispersivity and crystallinity. In this work, a SAXS/WAXS-based methodology is proposed for simultaneously quantifying size distribution and degree of crystallinity of NPs. The most reliable easy-to-access size result for each technique is demonstrated by computer simulation. Strategies on how to compare these results and how to identify NP-NP interaction effects underneath the SAXS intensity curve are presented. Experimental results are shown for cubic-like CeO2 NPs. WAXS size results from two analytical procedures are compared, line-profile fitting of individual diffraction peaks in opposition to whole pattern fitting. The impact of shape dispersivity is also evaluated. Extension of the proposed methodology for cross-analyzing EM and WAXS data is possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Many research topics in condensed matter research, materials science and the life sciences make use of crystallographic methods to study crystalline and non-crystalline matter with neutrons, X-rays and electrons. Articles published in the Journal of Applied Crystallography focus on these methods and their use in identifying structural and diffusion-controlled phase transformations, structure-property relationships, structural changes of defects, interfaces and surfaces, etc. Developments of instrumentation and crystallographic apparatus, theory and interpretation, numerical analysis and other related subjects are also covered. The journal is the primary place where crystallographic computer program information is published.
期刊最新文献
SUBGROUPS: a computer tool at the Bilbao Crystallographic Server for the study of pseudo-symmetric or distorted structures. Characterization of sub-micrometre-sized voids in fixed human brain tissue using scanning X-ray microdiffraction. Electronic angle focusing for neutron time-of-flight powder diffractometers. Link between b.c.c.-f.c.c. orientation relationship and austenite morphology in CF8M stainless steel. In situ counter-diffusion crystallization and long-term crystal preservation in microfluidic fixed targets for serial crystallography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1