"如果我选择听从别人的意见,我可能就不会实行计划生育了":坦桑尼亚西北部农村地区妇女避孕自主权的外部影响。

Valencia J Lambert, Anna Samson, Aneth Nzali, Lydia Mukasa, Neema Kachembeho, Sheridan Bowers, Samuel E Kalluvya, Agrey H Mwakisole, Jennifer A Downs
{"title":"\"如果我选择听从别人的意见,我可能就不会实行计划生育了\":坦桑尼亚西北部农村地区妇女避孕自主权的外部影响。","authors":"Valencia J Lambert, Anna Samson, Aneth Nzali, Lydia Mukasa, Neema Kachembeho, Sheridan Bowers, Samuel E Kalluvya, Agrey H Mwakisole, Jennifer A Downs","doi":"10.1177/17455057241259173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increasing emphasis on promoting women's autonomy in reproductive decision-making, particularly given global efforts to increase contraceptive access and uptake. Scales to quantify autonomy have inconsistently included the effect of external influences and focused primarily on influences of partners.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to gain greater depth in understanding how influences including and beyond a woman's partner affect her contraceptive decision-making, as well as how external influences can overlap and further complicate contraceptive decision-making.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A phenomenological, qualitative study in which in-depth interviews were conducted in three phases from May 2021 to February 2022 with women living in northwest Tanzania who had varying histories of contraceptive use or non-use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-on-one, in-depth interviews were conducted in Swahili, the national language of Tanzania, by trained female interviewers. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and independently coded by three investigators. Analysis was conducted using NVivo. The codes developed from the transcripts were grouped into overarching themes with supporting illustrative quotes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 women were interviewed. Partners were the most influential in women's family planning decision-making, followed by friends, relatives, community religious leaders, and healthcare providers. Out of the 52 women with a partner who had ever used family planning, 76.9% had discussed their desire to use family planning with their partner and nearly all reported strong pressures to use or not to use family planning from partners, family, and friends. Rarely, participants stated that they were devoid of any influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In rural Tanzania, women's decision-making about family planning was highly impacted by external influences, including not only partners but also family, friends, and community. Indicators of women's reproductive autonomy and measurements of interventions to promote contraceptive use should incorporate measures of these external influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"20 ","pages":"17455057241259173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"If I chose to listen to people, I possibly wouldn't be using family planning\\\": Impact of external influences on women's contraceptive autonomy in rural Northwest Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Valencia J Lambert, Anna Samson, Aneth Nzali, Lydia Mukasa, Neema Kachembeho, Sheridan Bowers, Samuel E Kalluvya, Agrey H Mwakisole, Jennifer A Downs\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17455057241259173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increasing emphasis on promoting women's autonomy in reproductive decision-making, particularly given global efforts to increase contraceptive access and uptake. Scales to quantify autonomy have inconsistently included the effect of external influences and focused primarily on influences of partners.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to gain greater depth in understanding how influences including and beyond a woman's partner affect her contraceptive decision-making, as well as how external influences can overlap and further complicate contraceptive decision-making.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A phenomenological, qualitative study in which in-depth interviews were conducted in three phases from May 2021 to February 2022 with women living in northwest Tanzania who had varying histories of contraceptive use or non-use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-on-one, in-depth interviews were conducted in Swahili, the national language of Tanzania, by trained female interviewers. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and independently coded by three investigators. Analysis was conducted using NVivo. The codes developed from the transcripts were grouped into overarching themes with supporting illustrative quotes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 women were interviewed. Partners were the most influential in women's family planning decision-making, followed by friends, relatives, community religious leaders, and healthcare providers. Out of the 52 women with a partner who had ever used family planning, 76.9% had discussed their desire to use family planning with their partner and nearly all reported strong pressures to use or not to use family planning from partners, family, and friends. Rarely, participants stated that they were devoid of any influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In rural Tanzania, women's decision-making about family planning was highly impacted by external influences, including not only partners but also family, friends, and community. Indicators of women's reproductive autonomy and measurements of interventions to promote contraceptive use should incorporate measures of these external influences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"17455057241259173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241259173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241259173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们越来越重视促进妇女在生育决策中的自主权,特别是考虑到全球都在努力提高避孕药具的普及率和使用率。量化自主性的量表并未将外部影响纳入其中,而是主要关注伴侣的影响:本研究旨在更深入地了解包括伴侣在内和伴侣以外的影响因素如何影响女性的避孕决策,以及外部影响因素如何重叠并使避孕决策进一步复杂化:这是一项现象学定性研究,从 2021 年 5 月到 2022 年 2 月,分三个阶段对生活在坦桑尼亚西北部的妇女进行了深入访谈,这些妇女使用或不使用避孕药具的历史各不相同:方法:一对一的深度访谈由训练有素的女性访谈者以坦桑尼亚国语斯瓦希里语进行。访谈由三位调查人员进行数字录音、转录、翻译成英语并独立编码。使用 NVivo 进行分析。从记录稿中得出的编码被归类为总体主题,并附有说明性引文:共有 72 名妇女接受了访谈。伴侣对妇女的计划生育决策影响最大,其次是朋友、亲戚、社区宗教领袖和医疗服务提供者。在 52 名有伴侣且曾经使用过计划生育的妇女中,76.9% 的人曾与伴侣讨论过使用计划生育的愿望,几乎所有的人都表示,伴侣、家人和朋友都给她们施加了很大的压力,要求她们使用或不使用计划生育。很少有参与者表示自己不受任何影响:结论:在坦桑尼亚农村地区,妇女的计划生育决策受到外部影响的影响很大,这些外部影响不仅包括伴侣,还包括家庭、朋友和社区。妇女生殖自主权的指标和促进避孕药具使用的干预措施的衡量标准应包括对这些外部影响的衡量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"If I chose to listen to people, I possibly wouldn't be using family planning": Impact of external influences on women's contraceptive autonomy in rural Northwest Tanzania.

Background: There is an increasing emphasis on promoting women's autonomy in reproductive decision-making, particularly given global efforts to increase contraceptive access and uptake. Scales to quantify autonomy have inconsistently included the effect of external influences and focused primarily on influences of partners.

Objectives: This study aimed to gain greater depth in understanding how influences including and beyond a woman's partner affect her contraceptive decision-making, as well as how external influences can overlap and further complicate contraceptive decision-making.

Design: A phenomenological, qualitative study in which in-depth interviews were conducted in three phases from May 2021 to February 2022 with women living in northwest Tanzania who had varying histories of contraceptive use or non-use.

Methods: One-on-one, in-depth interviews were conducted in Swahili, the national language of Tanzania, by trained female interviewers. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and independently coded by three investigators. Analysis was conducted using NVivo. The codes developed from the transcripts were grouped into overarching themes with supporting illustrative quotes.

Results: A total of 72 women were interviewed. Partners were the most influential in women's family planning decision-making, followed by friends, relatives, community religious leaders, and healthcare providers. Out of the 52 women with a partner who had ever used family planning, 76.9% had discussed their desire to use family planning with their partner and nearly all reported strong pressures to use or not to use family planning from partners, family, and friends. Rarely, participants stated that they were devoid of any influence.

Conclusion: In rural Tanzania, women's decision-making about family planning was highly impacted by external influences, including not only partners but also family, friends, and community. Indicators of women's reproductive autonomy and measurements of interventions to promote contraceptive use should incorporate measures of these external influences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical violence and its associations: Insights from nationally representative data in India. Unlocking breast cancer in Brazilian public health system: Using tissue microarray for accurate immunohistochemical evaluation with limitations in subtyping. Improving access, understanding, and dignity during miscarriage recovery in British Columbia, Canada: A patient-oriented research study. Common maternal health problems and their correlates in early post-partum mothers. Empowered management for pelvic pain: The experiences of women with persistent pelvic pain participating in an online self-directed self-management program while they wait for interprofessional care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1