使用风险评分预测感染性心内膜炎术后 30 天的死亡率:欧洲多中心比较验证研究的启示。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.021
Giuseppe Gatti MD , Antonio Fiore MD, PhD , Maria Ismail MD , Andriy Dralov MD , Wael Saade MD , Venera Costantino MSc , Giulia Barbati MStat , Pascal Lim MD, PhD , Raphael Lepeule MD, PhD , Ilaria Franzese MD , Alessandro Minati MD , Sandro Sponga MD, PhD , Enrico Fabris MD, PhD , Roberto Luzzati MD, PhD , Gianfranco Sinagra MD, PhD , Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai MD, MStat , Giacomo Frati MD, PhD , Andrea Perrotti MD, PhD , Igor Vendramin MD, PhD , Enzo Mazzaro MD
{"title":"使用风险评分预测感染性心内膜炎术后 30 天的死亡率:欧洲多中心比较验证研究的启示。","authors":"Giuseppe Gatti MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Fiore MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Maria Ismail MD ,&nbsp;Andriy Dralov MD ,&nbsp;Wael Saade MD ,&nbsp;Venera Costantino MSc ,&nbsp;Giulia Barbati MStat ,&nbsp;Pascal Lim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Raphael Lepeule MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ilaria Franzese MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Minati MD ,&nbsp;Sandro Sponga MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Enrico Fabris MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Roberto Luzzati MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Sinagra MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai MD, MStat ,&nbsp;Giacomo Frati MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Perrotti MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Igor Vendramin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Enzo Mazzaro MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It remains unclear today whether risk scores created specifically to predict early mortality after cardiac operations for infective endocarditis (IE) outperform or not the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Perioperative data and outcomes from a European multicenter series of patients undergoing surgery for definite IE were retrospectively reviewed. Only the cases with known pathogen and without missing values for all considered variables were retained for analyses. A comparative validation of EuroSCORE II and 5 specific risk scores for early mortality after surgery for IE—(1) STS-IE (Society of Thoracic Surgeons for IE); (2) PALSUSE (Prosthetic valve, Age ≥70, Large intracardiac destruction, <em>Staphylococcus spp</em>, Urgent surgery, Sex (female), EuroSCORE ≥10); (3) ANCLA (Anemia, New York Heart Association class IV, Critical state, Large intracardiac destruction, surgery on thoracic Aorta); (4) AEPEI II (Association pour l’Étude et la Prévention de l'Endocardite Infectieuse II); (5) APORTEI (Análisis de los factores PROnósticos en el Tratamiento quirúrgico de la Endocarditis Infecciosa)—was carried out using calibration plot and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared 1:1 according to the Hanley–McNeil's method. The agreement between APORTEI score and EuroSCORE II of the 30-day mortality prediction after surgery was also appraised.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1,012 patients from 5 European university-affiliated centers underwent 1,036 cardiac operations, with a 30-day mortality after surgery of 9.7%. All IE-specific risk scores considered achieved better results than EuroSCORE II in terms of calibration; AEPEI II and APORTEI score showed the best performances. Despite poor calibration, EuroSCORE II overcame in discrimination every specific risk score (AUC, 0.751 vs 0.693 or less, <em>P</em> = .01 or less). For a higher/lesser than 20% expected mortality, the agreement of prediction between APORTEI score and EuroSCORE II was 86%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EuroSCORE II discrimination for 30-day mortality after surgery for IE was higher than 5 established IE-specific risk scores. AEPEI II and APORTEI score showed the best results in terms of calibration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of 30‐day mortality after surgery for infective endocarditis using risk scores: Insights from a European multicenter comparative validation study\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Gatti MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Fiore MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Maria Ismail MD ,&nbsp;Andriy Dralov MD ,&nbsp;Wael Saade MD ,&nbsp;Venera Costantino MSc ,&nbsp;Giulia Barbati MStat ,&nbsp;Pascal Lim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Raphael Lepeule MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ilaria Franzese MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Minati MD ,&nbsp;Sandro Sponga MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Enrico Fabris MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Roberto Luzzati MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Sinagra MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai MD, MStat ,&nbsp;Giacomo Frati MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Perrotti MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Igor Vendramin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Enzo Mazzaro MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It remains unclear today whether risk scores created specifically to predict early mortality after cardiac operations for infective endocarditis (IE) outperform or not the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Perioperative data and outcomes from a European multicenter series of patients undergoing surgery for definite IE were retrospectively reviewed. Only the cases with known pathogen and without missing values for all considered variables were retained for analyses. A comparative validation of EuroSCORE II and 5 specific risk scores for early mortality after surgery for IE—(1) STS-IE (Society of Thoracic Surgeons for IE); (2) PALSUSE (Prosthetic valve, Age ≥70, Large intracardiac destruction, <em>Staphylococcus spp</em>, Urgent surgery, Sex (female), EuroSCORE ≥10); (3) ANCLA (Anemia, New York Heart Association class IV, Critical state, Large intracardiac destruction, surgery on thoracic Aorta); (4) AEPEI II (Association pour l’Étude et la Prévention de l'Endocardite Infectieuse II); (5) APORTEI (Análisis de los factores PROnósticos en el Tratamiento quirúrgico de la Endocarditis Infecciosa)—was carried out using calibration plot and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared 1:1 according to the Hanley–McNeil's method. The agreement between APORTEI score and EuroSCORE II of the 30-day mortality prediction after surgery was also appraised.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1,012 patients from 5 European university-affiliated centers underwent 1,036 cardiac operations, with a 30-day mortality after surgery of 9.7%. All IE-specific risk scores considered achieved better results than EuroSCORE II in terms of calibration; AEPEI II and APORTEI score showed the best performances. Despite poor calibration, EuroSCORE II overcame in discrimination every specific risk score (AUC, 0.751 vs 0.693 or less, <em>P</em> = .01 or less). For a higher/lesser than 20% expected mortality, the agreement of prediction between APORTEI score and EuroSCORE II was 86%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EuroSCORE II discrimination for 30-day mortality after surgery for IE was higher than 5 established IE-specific risk scores. AEPEI II and APORTEI score showed the best results in terms of calibration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001431\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前尚不清楚专为预测感染性心内膜炎(IE)心脏手术后早期死亡率而创建的风险评分是否优于欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 II(EuroSCORE II):方法:对欧洲多中心系列确诊 IE 手术患者的围手术期数据和结果进行了回顾性研究。仅保留已知病原体且所有考虑变量均无缺失值的病例进行分析。比较验证了EuroSCORE II和五种特定的IE术后早期死亡率风险评分--(1) STS-IE(胸外科医师协会IE评分);(2) PALSUSE(人工瓣膜、年龄≥70岁、心内大面积破坏、葡萄球菌属、紧急手术、性别(女性)、EuroSCORE≥10);(3) ANCLA(贫血、纽约心脏协会 IV 级、危急状态、心内大面积损伤、胸主动脉手术); (4) AEPEI II(心内膜感染研究与预防协会 II);(5) APORTEI(Análisis de los factores PROnósticos en el Tratamiento quirúrgico de la Endocarditis Infeciosa)- 采用校准图和接收器工作特征曲线分析法。根据汉利-麦克尼尔法,对曲线下面积(AUC)进行了1:1比较。此外,还评估了 APORTEI 评分与 EuroSCORE II 预测术后 30 天死亡率的一致性:来自欧洲五所大学附属中心的 1012 名患者接受了 1036 例心脏手术,术后 30 天死亡率为 9.7%。所有IE特异性风险评分的校准结果均优于EuroSCORE II;AEPEI II和APORTEI评分表现最佳。尽管校准效果不佳,但EuroSCORE II在辨别每种特异性风险评分方面都胜出一筹(AUC,0.751 vs. 0.693或更低,p=0.01或更低)。对于高于/低于20%的预期死亡率,APORTEI评分和EuroSCORE II的预测一致率为86%:结论:EuroSCORE II 对 IE 术后 30 天死亡率的判别高于五种已建立的 IE 特异性风险评分。AEPEI II 和 APORTEI 评分的校准结果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of 30‐day mortality after surgery for infective endocarditis using risk scores: Insights from a European multicenter comparative validation study

Background

It remains unclear today whether risk scores created specifically to predict early mortality after cardiac operations for infective endocarditis (IE) outperform or not the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II).

Methods

Perioperative data and outcomes from a European multicenter series of patients undergoing surgery for definite IE were retrospectively reviewed. Only the cases with known pathogen and without missing values for all considered variables were retained for analyses. A comparative validation of EuroSCORE II and 5 specific risk scores for early mortality after surgery for IE—(1) STS-IE (Society of Thoracic Surgeons for IE); (2) PALSUSE (Prosthetic valve, Age ≥70, Large intracardiac destruction, Staphylococcus spp, Urgent surgery, Sex (female), EuroSCORE ≥10); (3) ANCLA (Anemia, New York Heart Association class IV, Critical state, Large intracardiac destruction, surgery on thoracic Aorta); (4) AEPEI II (Association pour l’Étude et la Prévention de l'Endocardite Infectieuse II); (5) APORTEI (Análisis de los factores PROnósticos en el Tratamiento quirúrgico de la Endocarditis Infecciosa)—was carried out using calibration plot and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared 1:1 according to the Hanley–McNeil's method. The agreement between APORTEI score and EuroSCORE II of the 30-day mortality prediction after surgery was also appraised.

Results

A total of 1,012 patients from 5 European university-affiliated centers underwent 1,036 cardiac operations, with a 30-day mortality after surgery of 9.7%. All IE-specific risk scores considered achieved better results than EuroSCORE II in terms of calibration; AEPEI II and APORTEI score showed the best performances. Despite poor calibration, EuroSCORE II overcame in discrimination every specific risk score (AUC, 0.751 vs 0.693 or less, P = .01 or less). For a higher/lesser than 20% expected mortality, the agreement of prediction between APORTEI score and EuroSCORE II was 86%.

Conclusion

EuroSCORE II discrimination for 30-day mortality after surgery for IE was higher than 5 established IE-specific risk scores. AEPEI II and APORTEI score showed the best results in terms of calibration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Information for Readers Blood and urine metal levels in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease Response to Tomoyuki Kawada: Blood and urine metal levels in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1