在紫杉醇预处理方案中将组胺-1 受体拮抗剂氯马斯汀换成西替利嗪的效果:H1-切换研究

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00110
Ruben Malmberg, Leni van Doorn, Juul M Cox, Alaa Daloul, Halima Ettafahi, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Michiel Zietse, Monique E M M Bos, Birgit C P Koch, Roelof W F van Leeuwen
{"title":"在紫杉醇预处理方案中将组胺-1 受体拮抗剂氯马斯汀换成西替利嗪的效果:H1-切换研究","authors":"Ruben Malmberg, Leni van Doorn, Juul M Cox, Alaa Daloul, Halima Ettafahi, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Michiel Zietse, Monique E M M Bos, Birgit C P Koch, Roelof W F van Leeuwen","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Premedication, including a histamine-1 receptor (H<sub>1</sub>) antagonist, is recommended to all patients treated with paclitaxel chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the scientific basis for this premedication is not robust, which provides opportunities for optimization. Substitution of intravenously administered first-generation H<sub>1</sub> antagonist for orally administered second-generation H<sub>1</sub> antagonist could reduce side effects, and improve efficiency and sustainability. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of substituting intravenous clemastine for oral cetirizine as prophylaxis for paclitaxel-induced HSRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, noninferiority study compares a historic cohort receiving a premedication regimen with intravenous clemastine to a prospective cohort receiving oral cetirizine. Primary end point of the study is HSR grade ≥3. The difference in incidence was calculated together with the 90% CI. We determined that the two-sided 90% CI of HSR grade ≥3 incidence in the oral cetirizine cohort should not be more than 4% higher (ie, the noninferiority margin) compared with the intravenous clemastine cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twelve patients were included in the oral cetirizine cohort (June 2022 and May 2023) and 183 in the intravenous clemastine cohort. HSR grade ≥3 incidence was 1.6% (n = 3) in the intravenous clemastine cohort and 0.5% (n = 1) in the oral cetirizine cohort, resulting in a difference of -1.2% (90% CI, -3.4 to 1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Premedication containing oral cetirizine is as safe as premedication containing intravenous clemastine in preventing paclitaxel-induced HSR grade ≥3. These findings could contribute to optimization of care for patients and improve efficiency and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"1243-1251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Switching the Histamine-1 Receptor Antagonist Clemastine to Cetirizine in Paclitaxel Premedication Regimens: The H1-Switch Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Malmberg, Leni van Doorn, Juul M Cox, Alaa Daloul, Halima Ettafahi, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Michiel Zietse, Monique E M M Bos, Birgit C P Koch, Roelof W F van Leeuwen\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP.24.00110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Premedication, including a histamine-1 receptor (H<sub>1</sub>) antagonist, is recommended to all patients treated with paclitaxel chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the scientific basis for this premedication is not robust, which provides opportunities for optimization. Substitution of intravenously administered first-generation H<sub>1</sub> antagonist for orally administered second-generation H<sub>1</sub> antagonist could reduce side effects, and improve efficiency and sustainability. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of substituting intravenous clemastine for oral cetirizine as prophylaxis for paclitaxel-induced HSRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, noninferiority study compares a historic cohort receiving a premedication regimen with intravenous clemastine to a prospective cohort receiving oral cetirizine. Primary end point of the study is HSR grade ≥3. The difference in incidence was calculated together with the 90% CI. We determined that the two-sided 90% CI of HSR grade ≥3 incidence in the oral cetirizine cohort should not be more than 4% higher (ie, the noninferiority margin) compared with the intravenous clemastine cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twelve patients were included in the oral cetirizine cohort (June 2022 and May 2023) and 183 in the intravenous clemastine cohort. HSR grade ≥3 incidence was 1.6% (n = 3) in the intravenous clemastine cohort and 0.5% (n = 1) in the oral cetirizine cohort, resulting in a difference of -1.2% (90% CI, -3.4 to 1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Premedication containing oral cetirizine is as safe as premedication containing intravenous clemastine in preventing paclitaxel-induced HSR grade ≥3. These findings could contribute to optimization of care for patients and improve efficiency and sustainability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1243-1251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00110\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建议所有接受紫杉醇化疗的患者使用包括组胺-1受体(H1)拮抗剂在内的预用药,以降低超敏反应(HSR)的发生率。然而,这种预处理的科学依据并不充分,这就为优化提供了机会。用口服第二代 H1 拮抗剂替代静脉注射第一代 H1 拮抗剂可减少副作用,提高效率和可持续性。本研究探讨了用静脉注射氯马斯汀替代口服西替利嗪作为紫杉醇诱导的 HSR 预防药物的有效性和安全性:这项单中心、前瞻性、非劣效性研究将接受静脉注射氯马斯汀预处理方案的历史队列与接受口服西替利嗪的前瞻性队列进行比较。研究的主要终点是 HSR 等级≥3。我们计算了发病率的差异和 90% CI。我们确定,与静脉注射氯马斯汀队列相比,口服西替利嗪队列中 HSR ≥3级发生率的双侧 90% CI 不应高于 4%(即非劣效边际):口服西替利嗪队列(2022 年 6 月和 2023 年 5 月)共纳入 212 例患者,静脉注射氯马斯汀队列共纳入 183 例患者。HSR等级≥3的发生率在静脉注射氯马斯汀队列中为1.6%(n = 3),在口服西替利嗪队列中为0.5%(n = 1),差异为-1.2%(90% CI,-3.4至1.1):结论:在预防紫杉醇诱发 HSR ≥3级方面,口服西替利嗪的预处理与静脉注射氯马斯汀的预处理同样安全。这些发现有助于优化对患者的护理,提高效率和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Switching the Histamine-1 Receptor Antagonist Clemastine to Cetirizine in Paclitaxel Premedication Regimens: The H1-Switch Study.

Purpose: Premedication, including a histamine-1 receptor (H1) antagonist, is recommended to all patients treated with paclitaxel chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the scientific basis for this premedication is not robust, which provides opportunities for optimization. Substitution of intravenously administered first-generation H1 antagonist for orally administered second-generation H1 antagonist could reduce side effects, and improve efficiency and sustainability. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of substituting intravenous clemastine for oral cetirizine as prophylaxis for paclitaxel-induced HSRs.

Methods: This single-center, prospective, noninferiority study compares a historic cohort receiving a premedication regimen with intravenous clemastine to a prospective cohort receiving oral cetirizine. Primary end point of the study is HSR grade ≥3. The difference in incidence was calculated together with the 90% CI. We determined that the two-sided 90% CI of HSR grade ≥3 incidence in the oral cetirizine cohort should not be more than 4% higher (ie, the noninferiority margin) compared with the intravenous clemastine cohort.

Results: Two hundred and twelve patients were included in the oral cetirizine cohort (June 2022 and May 2023) and 183 in the intravenous clemastine cohort. HSR grade ≥3 incidence was 1.6% (n = 3) in the intravenous clemastine cohort and 0.5% (n = 1) in the oral cetirizine cohort, resulting in a difference of -1.2% (90% CI, -3.4 to 1.1).

Conclusion: Premedication containing oral cetirizine is as safe as premedication containing intravenous clemastine in preventing paclitaxel-induced HSR grade ≥3. These findings could contribute to optimization of care for patients and improve efficiency and sustainability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Contextual Framework for Understanding Treatment De-Escalation in Patients With Breast Cancer. Reply to: The Value of Offering Oncofertility Counseling in Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer Is Unquestionable. The Value of Offering Oncofertility Counseling in Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer Is Unquestionable. Systemic Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update Clinical Insights. Clinical Relevance of Intensive Laboratory Monitoring With Standard Venetoclax Ramp-Up for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1