绿色创新技术和民主在向可持续性过渡中的关键作用:对主要新兴市场经济体的研究

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Technology in Society Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102622
Umut Uzar
{"title":"绿色创新技术和民主在向可持续性过渡中的关键作用:对主要新兴市场经济体的研究","authors":"Umut Uzar","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent studies emphasize the potential of green technologies and political factors as catalysts for sustainability. Despite extensive examination of various factors' impacts on ecological footprints in previous literature, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the environmental effects of these two factors. Addressing this gap in the literature, this study underscores the importance of green innovation technologies and democracy in the transition to sustainability. The study aims to investigate the impact of green innovation technologies, democracy, income inequality, globalization, economic growth, and energy consumption on the ecological footprint in seven leading emerging market nations from 1990 to 2018. The study utilized second-generation panel data methodology to identify the relationship between variables using the Augmented Mean Group procedure. The study's findings indicate that green innovation technologies and democracy reduce the ecological footprint of the entire panel. While globalization is a force that reduces ecological pressure, income distribution has no significant impact. Factors that significantly increase the ecological footprint include economic growth and energy consumption. Although the results at the country level are somewhat heterogeneous, they provide supportive and promising insights for the panel.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The critical role of green innovation technologies and democracy in the transition to sustainability: A study on leading emerging market economies\",\"authors\":\"Umut Uzar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recent studies emphasize the potential of green technologies and political factors as catalysts for sustainability. Despite extensive examination of various factors' impacts on ecological footprints in previous literature, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the environmental effects of these two factors. Addressing this gap in the literature, this study underscores the importance of green innovation technologies and democracy in the transition to sustainability. The study aims to investigate the impact of green innovation technologies, democracy, income inequality, globalization, economic growth, and energy consumption on the ecological footprint in seven leading emerging market nations from 1990 to 2018. The study utilized second-generation panel data methodology to identify the relationship between variables using the Augmented Mean Group procedure. The study's findings indicate that green innovation technologies and democracy reduce the ecological footprint of the entire panel. While globalization is a force that reduces ecological pressure, income distribution has no significant impact. Factors that significantly increase the ecological footprint include economic growth and energy consumption. Although the results at the country level are somewhat heterogeneous, they provide supportive and promising insights for the panel.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001702\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001702","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究强调了绿色技术和政治因素作为可持续发展催化剂的潜力。尽管以往的文献广泛研究了各种因素对生态足迹的影响,但有关这两个因素对环境影响的实证证据却很有限。针对这一文献空白,本研究强调了绿色创新技术和民主在向可持续发展过渡中的重要性。本研究旨在探讨 1990 年至 2018 年期间,绿色创新技术、民主、收入不平等、全球化、经济增长和能源消耗对七个主要新兴市场国家生态足迹的影响。研究采用了第二代面板数据方法,利用增强均值组程序识别变量之间的关系。研究结果表明,绿色创新技术和民主减少了整个面板的生态足迹。全球化是减轻生态压力的力量,而收入分配则没有显著影响。明显增加生态足迹的因素包括经济增长和能源消耗。虽然在国家层面上的结果存在一定差异,但它们为小组提供了支持性的、有前景的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The critical role of green innovation technologies and democracy in the transition to sustainability: A study on leading emerging market economies

Recent studies emphasize the potential of green technologies and political factors as catalysts for sustainability. Despite extensive examination of various factors' impacts on ecological footprints in previous literature, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the environmental effects of these two factors. Addressing this gap in the literature, this study underscores the importance of green innovation technologies and democracy in the transition to sustainability. The study aims to investigate the impact of green innovation technologies, democracy, income inequality, globalization, economic growth, and energy consumption on the ecological footprint in seven leading emerging market nations from 1990 to 2018. The study utilized second-generation panel data methodology to identify the relationship between variables using the Augmented Mean Group procedure. The study's findings indicate that green innovation technologies and democracy reduce the ecological footprint of the entire panel. While globalization is a force that reduces ecological pressure, income distribution has no significant impact. Factors that significantly increase the ecological footprint include economic growth and energy consumption. Although the results at the country level are somewhat heterogeneous, they provide supportive and promising insights for the panel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
期刊最新文献
Potential risk and efficiency analysis of decision-making dilemmas in connected dual-vehicle interactions at uncontrolled intersections Knowledge source switching under state interventions of latecomer regions: A case study of Shenzhen Can cluster analysis enrich the innovation resistance theory? The case of mobile payment usage in Italy Pathway towards SME competitiveness: Digital capability and digital business model innovation Forecasting the evolution of urban mobility: The influence of anthropomorphism and social responsiveness in the transition from human to automated driving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1