足部放射学形态是假性骨骨折的预测因素:回顾性病例对照研究

Q2 Health Professions Foot Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2024.102103
Erdi Imre , Bilgin Bozgeyik , Onur Kaya
{"title":"足部放射学形态是假性骨骨折的预测因素:回顾性病例对照研究","authors":"Erdi Imre ,&nbsp;Bilgin Bozgeyik ,&nbsp;Onur Kaya","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2024.102103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fifth metatarsal basis fractures are common injuries. Zone 1 fractures are also known as pseudo-jones fractures. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of foot radiologic morphology on pseudo-Jones fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with pseudo-Jones fractures formed the case group and individuals with ankle sprains but no fractures formed control group. Weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were evaluated for pre-determined measurements: metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), intermetatarsal angles (1−2, 4−5), calcaneal inclination (CI) angle, and fifth metatarsal base angle. All measurements were performed by a single investigator using digital PACS tools. Statistical analysis compared these radiographic parameters between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The fracture group demonstrated a significantly lower 4–5 intermetatarsal and calcaneal inclination angles than the control group (p &lt; 0.05). Notably, no statistically significant difference was found in the metatarsus adductus angle.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates a potential association between foot radiographic morphology and pseudo-Jones fractures. Patients with a lower 4–5 IMA and calcaneal inclination angle may be at a higher risk for developing pseudo-Jones fractures. However, these requires future prospective studies.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III case control study</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foot radiologic morphology as a predictor of pseudo-jones fractures: A retrospective case-control study\",\"authors\":\"Erdi Imre ,&nbsp;Bilgin Bozgeyik ,&nbsp;Onur Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foot.2024.102103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fifth metatarsal basis fractures are common injuries. Zone 1 fractures are also known as pseudo-jones fractures. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of foot radiologic morphology on pseudo-Jones fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with pseudo-Jones fractures formed the case group and individuals with ankle sprains but no fractures formed control group. Weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were evaluated for pre-determined measurements: metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), intermetatarsal angles (1−2, 4−5), calcaneal inclination (CI) angle, and fifth metatarsal base angle. All measurements were performed by a single investigator using digital PACS tools. Statistical analysis compared these radiographic parameters between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The fracture group demonstrated a significantly lower 4–5 intermetatarsal and calcaneal inclination angles than the control group (p &lt; 0.05). Notably, no statistically significant difference was found in the metatarsus adductus angle.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates a potential association between foot radiographic morphology and pseudo-Jones fractures. Patients with a lower 4–5 IMA and calcaneal inclination angle may be at a higher risk for developing pseudo-Jones fractures. However, these requires future prospective studies.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III case control study</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259224000361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259224000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景第五跖骨基底骨折是一种常见的损伤。1区骨折也被称为假性琼斯骨折。本研究旨在阐明足部放射学形态对假喙突骨折的影响。方法假喙突骨折患者组成病例组,踝关节扭伤但无骨折者组成对照组。对负重前后位和侧位X光片进行预先确定的测量:跖骨内收角(MAA)、跖骨间角(1-2、4-5)、小腿骨倾斜角(CI)和第五跖骨基底角。所有测量均由一名研究人员使用数字 PACS 工具完成。结果骨折组的 4-5跖间角和小趾骨倾斜角明显低于对照组(p <0.05)。值得注意的是,跖骨内收角的差异无统计学意义。IMA 和小腿骨倾斜角较低 4-5 的患者发生假性琼斯骨折的风险可能较高。然而,这些都需要未来的前瞻性研究。证据级别III级病例对照研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Foot radiologic morphology as a predictor of pseudo-jones fractures: A retrospective case-control study

Background

Fifth metatarsal basis fractures are common injuries. Zone 1 fractures are also known as pseudo-jones fractures. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of foot radiologic morphology on pseudo-Jones fractures.

Methods

Patients with pseudo-Jones fractures formed the case group and individuals with ankle sprains but no fractures formed control group. Weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were evaluated for pre-determined measurements: metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), intermetatarsal angles (1−2, 4−5), calcaneal inclination (CI) angle, and fifth metatarsal base angle. All measurements were performed by a single investigator using digital PACS tools. Statistical analysis compared these radiographic parameters between the groups.

Results

The fracture group demonstrated a significantly lower 4–5 intermetatarsal and calcaneal inclination angles than the control group (p < 0.05). Notably, no statistically significant difference was found in the metatarsus adductus angle.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a potential association between foot radiographic morphology and pseudo-Jones fractures. Patients with a lower 4–5 IMA and calcaneal inclination angle may be at a higher risk for developing pseudo-Jones fractures. However, these requires future prospective studies.

Level of evidence

Level III case control study

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot
Foot Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of custom hard-shell 3D-printed foot orthoses in a cohort of patients who did not respond to treatment with custom ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) foot orthoses Regional changes in the free Achilles tendon volume in response to repeated submaximal contractions Mechanical drivers of intrinsic foot muscle for maximum toe flexor strength in upright standing across different body size Accuracy and reliability of the Ipswich touch test in identifying loss of protective sensation among diabetic patients Predictors of poor pre-operative patient reported outcome measures in elective foot and ankle surgery: Analysis of 1217 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1