姑息关怀与终末期肝病:对姑息关怀使用情况及转诊相关因素的队列分析。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of hepatology Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101518
Hugo M Oliveira , Helena Pessegueiro Miranda , Francisca Rego , Rui Nunes
{"title":"姑息关怀与终末期肝病:对姑息关怀使用情况及转诊相关因素的队列分析。","authors":"Hugo M Oliveira ,&nbsp;Helena Pessegueiro Miranda ,&nbsp;Francisca Rego ,&nbsp;Rui Nunes","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><p>Prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease have risen significantly. In end stage liver disease, the survival of patients is approximately two years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden of these patients, integration of palliative care is limited. We aim to assess associated factors and trends in palliative care use in recent years.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A Multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with end stage liver disease who suffered in-hospital mortality between 2017 and 2019. Information regarding patient demographics, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, etiology, decompensations, and interventions was collected. Two-sided tests and logistic regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with palliative care use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 201 patients were analyzed, with a yearly increase in palliative care consultation: 26.7 % in 2017 to 38.3 % in 2019. Patients in palliative care were older (65.72 ± 11.70 vs. 62.10 ± 11.44; <em>p =</em> 0.003), had a lower Karnofsky functionality scale (χ=18.104; <em>p =</em> 0.000) and had higher rates of hepatic encephalopathy (32.1 % vs. 17.4 %, <em>p =</em> 0.007) and hepatocarcinoma (61.7 % vs. 26.2 %; <em>p =</em> 0.000). No differences were found for Model for End-stage Liver Disease (19.28 ± 6.60 vs. 19,90 ± 5.78; <em>p =</em> 0.507) or Child-Pugh scores (<em>p =</em> 0.739). None of the patients who die in the intensive care unit receive palliative care (0 % vs 31.6 %; <em>p =</em> 0.000). Half of the palliative care consultations occurred 6,5 days before death.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Palliative care use differs based on demographics, disease complications, and severity. Despite its increasing implementation, palliative care intervention occurs late. Future investigations should identify approaches to achieve an earlier and concurrent care model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":"29 5","pages":"Article 101518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268124003120/pdfft?md5=aadd9153f9c95837ae3412c1b6649263&pid=1-s2.0-S1665268124003120-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative care and end stage liver disease: A cohort analysis of palliative care use and factors associated with referral\",\"authors\":\"Hugo M Oliveira ,&nbsp;Helena Pessegueiro Miranda ,&nbsp;Francisca Rego ,&nbsp;Rui Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><p>Prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease have risen significantly. In end stage liver disease, the survival of patients is approximately two years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden of these patients, integration of palliative care is limited. We aim to assess associated factors and trends in palliative care use in recent years.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A Multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with end stage liver disease who suffered in-hospital mortality between 2017 and 2019. Information regarding patient demographics, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, etiology, decompensations, and interventions was collected. Two-sided tests and logistic regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with palliative care use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 201 patients were analyzed, with a yearly increase in palliative care consultation: 26.7 % in 2017 to 38.3 % in 2019. Patients in palliative care were older (65.72 ± 11.70 vs. 62.10 ± 11.44; <em>p =</em> 0.003), had a lower Karnofsky functionality scale (χ=18.104; <em>p =</em> 0.000) and had higher rates of hepatic encephalopathy (32.1 % vs. 17.4 %, <em>p =</em> 0.007) and hepatocarcinoma (61.7 % vs. 26.2 %; <em>p =</em> 0.000). No differences were found for Model for End-stage Liver Disease (19.28 ± 6.60 vs. 19,90 ± 5.78; <em>p =</em> 0.507) or Child-Pugh scores (<em>p =</em> 0.739). None of the patients who die in the intensive care unit receive palliative care (0 % vs 31.6 %; <em>p =</em> 0.000). Half of the palliative care consultations occurred 6,5 days before death.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Palliative care use differs based on demographics, disease complications, and severity. Despite its increasing implementation, palliative care intervention occurs late. Future investigations should identify approaches to achieve an earlier and concurrent care model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of hepatology\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268124003120/pdfft?md5=aadd9153f9c95837ae3412c1b6649263&pid=1-s2.0-S1665268124003120-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268124003120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268124003120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言和目标:慢性肝病的发病率和死亡率显著上升。晚期肝病患者的生存期约为两年。尽管这些患者的预后较差,症状负担较重,但姑息治疗的整合却很有限。我们旨在评估近年来使用姑息治疗的相关因素和趋势:多中心回顾性队列,对象为2017-2019年间院内死亡的终末期肝病患者。收集了有关患者人口统计学、医院特征、合并症、病因、失代偿和干预措施的信息。采用双侧检验和逻辑回归分析来确定与姑息治疗使用相关的因素:共分析了201名患者,姑息治疗就诊率逐年上升:2017年为26.7%,2019年为38.3%。接受姑息治疗的患者年龄较大(65,72±11,70 vs. 62,10±11,44;p=0,003),卡诺夫斯基功能评分较低(χ=18.104;p=0.000),肝性脑病(32.1% vs. 17.4%,p=0.007)和肝癌(61.7% vs. 26.2%;p=0.000)发生率较高。终末期肝病模型(19,28±6,60 vs. 19,90±5,78;p=0,507)或 Child-Pugh 评分(p=0,739)没有发现差异。在重症监护室死亡的患者中,没有一人接受姑息治疗(0% vs 31.6%;P=0.000)。半数姑息治疗咨询发生在死亡前6.5天:姑息治疗的使用因人口统计学、疾病并发症和严重程度而异。尽管姑息关怀的实施越来越多,但其干预却很晚。未来的调查应确定如何实现更早和同步的姑息关怀模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palliative care and end stage liver disease: A cohort analysis of palliative care use and factors associated with referral

Introduction and Objectives

Prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease have risen significantly. In end stage liver disease, the survival of patients is approximately two years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden of these patients, integration of palliative care is limited. We aim to assess associated factors and trends in palliative care use in recent years.

Materials and Methods

A Multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with end stage liver disease who suffered in-hospital mortality between 2017 and 2019. Information regarding patient demographics, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, etiology, decompensations, and interventions was collected. Two-sided tests and logistic regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with palliative care use.

Results

A total of 201 patients were analyzed, with a yearly increase in palliative care consultation: 26.7 % in 2017 to 38.3 % in 2019. Patients in palliative care were older (65.72 ± 11.70 vs. 62.10 ± 11.44; p = 0.003), had a lower Karnofsky functionality scale (χ=18.104; p = 0.000) and had higher rates of hepatic encephalopathy (32.1 % vs. 17.4 %, p = 0.007) and hepatocarcinoma (61.7 % vs. 26.2 %; p = 0.000). No differences were found for Model for End-stage Liver Disease (19.28 ± 6.60 vs. 19,90 ± 5.78; p = 0.507) or Child-Pugh scores (p = 0.739). None of the patients who die in the intensive care unit receive palliative care (0 % vs 31.6 %; p = 0.000). Half of the palliative care consultations occurred 6,5 days before death.

Conclusions

Palliative care use differs based on demographics, disease complications, and severity. Despite its increasing implementation, palliative care intervention occurs late. Future investigations should identify approaches to achieve an earlier and concurrent care model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Global multi-societies endorsement of the MAFLD definition An Acknowledgement Biological aging accelerates hepatic fibrosis: Insights from the NHANES 2017-2020 and genome-wide association study analysis. Development of a biodegradable prosthesis through tissue engineering, for the organ-replacement or substitution of the extrahepatic bile duct
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1