Ying LI , Demei Zhu , Shenghua Sun , Xiaoyue Chang , Zhaolong Cao , Yanping Yang , Xiuhua Fu , Xiangyang Li , Jinfu Xu , Yingqun Zhu , Fuxin Hui , Xingxiang Xu , Zhang Chen , Liping Peng , Zhuang Ma , Biwen Mo , Chen Li , Yuan Lv , Li Zhao , Guangfa Zhu , Yingyuan Zhang
{"title":"一项多中心、随机、双盲、双哑药、平行对照的 3 期临床试验,评估静脉注射苹果酸奈莫沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗成年患者社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Ying LI , Demei Zhu , Shenghua Sun , Xiaoyue Chang , Zhaolong Cao , Yanping Yang , Xiuhua Fu , Xiangyang Li , Jinfu Xu , Yingqun Zhu , Fuxin Hui , Xingxiang Xu , Zhang Chen , Liping Peng , Zhuang Ma , Biwen Mo , Chen Li , Yuan Lv , Li Zhao , Guangfa Zhu , Yingyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin vs. levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7–14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Secondary efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (<em>n</em> = 349) or levofloxacin (<em>n</em> = 176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (<em>P</em> > 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was non-inferior to levofloxacin for treatment of CAP. Microbiological success rate with nemonoxacin was 88.8% (95/107) and with levofloxacin was 87.8% (43/49) (<em>P</em> > 0.05) at the TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in the nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in the levofloxacin group. These AEs were mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7–14 days is effective and safe and non-inferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001535/pdfft?md5=99249c47d6b793136ea7139c268c8f82&pid=1-s2.0-S0924857924001535-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of intravenous nemonoxacin malate vs. levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients\",\"authors\":\"Ying LI , Demei Zhu , Shenghua Sun , Xiaoyue Chang , Zhaolong Cao , Yanping Yang , Xiuhua Fu , Xiangyang Li , Jinfu Xu , Yingqun Zhu , Fuxin Hui , Xingxiang Xu , Zhang Chen , Liping Peng , Zhuang Ma , Biwen Mo , Chen Li , Yuan Lv , Li Zhao , Guangfa Zhu , Yingyuan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin vs. levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7–14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Secondary efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (<em>n</em> = 349) or levofloxacin (<em>n</em> = 176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (<em>P</em> > 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was non-inferior to levofloxacin for treatment of CAP. Microbiological success rate with nemonoxacin was 88.8% (95/107) and with levofloxacin was 87.8% (43/49) (<em>P</em> > 0.05) at the TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in the nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in the levofloxacin group. These AEs were mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7–14 days is effective and safe and non-inferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001535/pdfft?md5=99249c47d6b793136ea7139c268c8f82&pid=1-s2.0-S0924857924001535-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001535\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001535","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of intravenous nemonoxacin malate vs. levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients
Background
Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin vs. levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients.
Methods
Eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7–14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Secondary efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin.
Results
Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (n = 349) or levofloxacin (n = 176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (P > 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was non-inferior to levofloxacin for treatment of CAP. Microbiological success rate with nemonoxacin was 88.8% (95/107) and with levofloxacin was 87.8% (43/49) (P > 0.05) at the TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in the nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in the levofloxacin group. These AEs were mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin.
Conclusions
Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7–14 days is effective and safe and non-inferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.