个性化囊性纤维化药物治疗问卷(PCF-MQ)的开发和初步验证。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of Cystic Fibrosis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcf.2024.05.011
Hanna Phan , Cori L Daines , Ti Woo , Kevin J. Psoter , Andrea Goodman , Emma McWilliams , Carla Frederick , Carlos Milla , Gabriela Oates , Gregory S. Sawicki , Kristin A. Riekert
{"title":"个性化囊性纤维化药物治疗问卷(PCF-MQ)的开发和初步验证。","authors":"Hanna Phan ,&nbsp;Cori L Daines ,&nbsp;Ti Woo ,&nbsp;Kevin J. Psoter ,&nbsp;Andrea Goodman ,&nbsp;Emma McWilliams ,&nbsp;Carla Frederick ,&nbsp;Carlos Milla ,&nbsp;Gabriela Oates ,&nbsp;Gregory S. Sawicki ,&nbsp;Kristin A. Riekert","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A personalized approach to assessing medication knowledge may identify opportunities for education to support self-management of cystic fibrosis (CF). This project describes the development, scoring, and preliminary validity of the Personalized CF Medication Questionnaire (PCF-MQ), designed to assess knowledge of prescribed CF medication purpose, administration, and dose and frequency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants completed the PCF-MQ, the Knowledge of Disease Management (KDM-CF), and the Cystic Fibrosis-Medication Beliefs Questionnaire (CF-MBQ). Prescribed regimens were abstracted from medical records. Eligibility criteria were age 12 years and older, diagnosed with CF, and prescribed a CF medication. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software. Spearman rho was used to test correlations between measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty people with CF (pwCF) were enrolled; three people reported a regimen that substantially deviated from the medical record and were excluded from the analyses. The mean (SD) age was 20.2 (7.3) years, 54 % were female, and 74 % had a FEV1pp ≥70 %. The mean (SD) PCF-MQ total score was 77.8 (12.3) and knowledge scores ranged from a low of 58.3 for levalbuterol to 100 for ivacaftor. The PCF-MQ total score correlated with the KDM total score and subscales (Spearman Rho= 0.32–0.59, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and was not correlated with the CF-MBQ subscales (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05)).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PCF-MQ was correlated with another measure of general CF knowledge, but not health beliefs; because of the small sample size, this should be considered preliminary evidence of its validity. Advantages over existing CF knowledge measures include its practicality for use to help assess pwCF's knowledge about their prescribed regimen.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages 1100-1105"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and preliminary validation of the personalized cystic fibrosis medication questionnaire (PCF-MQ)\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Phan ,&nbsp;Cori L Daines ,&nbsp;Ti Woo ,&nbsp;Kevin J. Psoter ,&nbsp;Andrea Goodman ,&nbsp;Emma McWilliams ,&nbsp;Carla Frederick ,&nbsp;Carlos Milla ,&nbsp;Gabriela Oates ,&nbsp;Gregory S. Sawicki ,&nbsp;Kristin A. Riekert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcf.2024.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A personalized approach to assessing medication knowledge may identify opportunities for education to support self-management of cystic fibrosis (CF). This project describes the development, scoring, and preliminary validity of the Personalized CF Medication Questionnaire (PCF-MQ), designed to assess knowledge of prescribed CF medication purpose, administration, and dose and frequency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants completed the PCF-MQ, the Knowledge of Disease Management (KDM-CF), and the Cystic Fibrosis-Medication Beliefs Questionnaire (CF-MBQ). Prescribed regimens were abstracted from medical records. Eligibility criteria were age 12 years and older, diagnosed with CF, and prescribed a CF medication. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software. Spearman rho was used to test correlations between measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty people with CF (pwCF) were enrolled; three people reported a regimen that substantially deviated from the medical record and were excluded from the analyses. The mean (SD) age was 20.2 (7.3) years, 54 % were female, and 74 % had a FEV1pp ≥70 %. The mean (SD) PCF-MQ total score was 77.8 (12.3) and knowledge scores ranged from a low of 58.3 for levalbuterol to 100 for ivacaftor. The PCF-MQ total score correlated with the KDM total score and subscales (Spearman Rho= 0.32–0.59, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and was not correlated with the CF-MBQ subscales (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05)).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PCF-MQ was correlated with another measure of general CF knowledge, but not health beliefs; because of the small sample size, this should be considered preliminary evidence of its validity. Advantages over existing CF knowledge measures include its practicality for use to help assess pwCF's knowledge about their prescribed regimen.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1100-1105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569199324000730\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569199324000730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估用药知识的个性化方法可确定教育机会,以支持囊性纤维化(CF)患者的自我管理。本项目介绍了个性化CF用药问卷(PCF-MQ)的开发、评分和初步有效性,该问卷旨在评估CF处方用药目的、管理、剂量和频率等方面的知识:方法:参与者填写 PCF-MQ、疾病管理知识问卷 (KDM-CF) 和囊性纤维化用药信念问卷 (CF-MBQ)。处方方案摘自医疗记录。资格标准为年龄在 12 岁及以上、确诊为囊性纤维化并开具了囊性纤维化药物处方。统计分析使用 R 软件进行。结果:共有 60 名 CF 患者(pwCF)参加了研究,其中 3 人报告的治疗方案与医疗记录严重不符,因此被排除在分析之外。平均(标清)年龄为 20.2(7.3)岁,54% 为女性,74% 的 FEV1pp ≥70%。PCF-MQ总分的平均值(标清)为77.8(12.3)分,知识得分从最低的58.3分到100分不等(利伐布特罗为58.3分,伊伐卡夫托为100分)。PCF-MQ 总分与 KDM 总分和分量表相关(Spearman Rho= 0.32-0.59, p < 0.05),与 CF-MBQ 分量表无关(p > 0.05):PCF-MQ与另一项CF常识测量相关,但与健康信念无关;由于样本量较小,这应被视为其有效性的初步证据。与现有的CF知识测量方法相比,该方法的优点包括实用性强,可帮助评估贫困儿童对处方疗法的了解程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and preliminary validation of the personalized cystic fibrosis medication questionnaire (PCF-MQ)

Background

A personalized approach to assessing medication knowledge may identify opportunities for education to support self-management of cystic fibrosis (CF). This project describes the development, scoring, and preliminary validity of the Personalized CF Medication Questionnaire (PCF-MQ), designed to assess knowledge of prescribed CF medication purpose, administration, and dose and frequency.

Methods

Participants completed the PCF-MQ, the Knowledge of Disease Management (KDM-CF), and the Cystic Fibrosis-Medication Beliefs Questionnaire (CF-MBQ). Prescribed regimens were abstracted from medical records. Eligibility criteria were age 12 years and older, diagnosed with CF, and prescribed a CF medication. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software. Spearman rho was used to test correlations between measures.

Results

Sixty people with CF (pwCF) were enrolled; three people reported a regimen that substantially deviated from the medical record and were excluded from the analyses. The mean (SD) age was 20.2 (7.3) years, 54 % were female, and 74 % had a FEV1pp ≥70 %. The mean (SD) PCF-MQ total score was 77.8 (12.3) and knowledge scores ranged from a low of 58.3 for levalbuterol to 100 for ivacaftor. The PCF-MQ total score correlated with the KDM total score and subscales (Spearman Rho= 0.32–0.59, p < 0.05) and was not correlated with the CF-MBQ subscales (p > 0.05)).

Conclusions

The PCF-MQ was correlated with another measure of general CF knowledge, but not health beliefs; because of the small sample size, this should be considered preliminary evidence of its validity. Advantages over existing CF knowledge measures include its practicality for use to help assess pwCF's knowledge about their prescribed regimen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.
期刊最新文献
Real-world association between ivacaftor initiation and lung function variability: A registry study. Mycobacterium abscessus biofilm cleared from murine lung by monoclonal antibody against bacterial DNABII proteins. Personalized therapy with CFTR modulators: Response of p.Ile148Asn variant. Real-world outcomes of generic elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (gETI) in South Africans (SA) with CF using standard versus clarithromycin-boosted gETI, modulator-sparing strategies to reduce cost. Impact of CFTR modulator therapy on basic life needs and financial concerns in people with cystic fibrosis: Data from the Well-ME survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1