膝关节骨性关节炎的社会心理因素:证据范围综述与未来机遇》。

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2024.05.015
{"title":"膝关节骨性关节炎的社会心理因素:证据范围综述与未来机遇》。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Identify, describe and produce an evidence map of studies investigating psychosocial factors association with, or effect on, clinical outcomes for people with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Scoping review of interventional and observational studies was performed. Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycInfo and Web of Science were searched on the 15th May 2023. Screening, data extraction and analysis was performed by two independent researchers. Extracted information included characteristics of studies plus which psychosocial factors were used to investigate association with, or effect on, clinical outcome(s). Descriptive statistics summarized the study design, temporal trend, geographic distribution, frequency of each psychosocial factor and whether associations/effects were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>23,065 records were screened, with 108 studies selected. Eighty-two percent of studies (n = 89/108) were cross-sectional in design. Number of studies increased over time and spanned 28 countries. Most research originated from the Americas region (55 %, 59/108). Twenty-four psychosocial factors (11 psychological, 13 social) were identified. Depression (47 %, n = 48/102) and education (28 %, n = 29/102) were the most frequently reported psychological and social factors, respectively. Psychological factors were often reported to have an association with/effect on pain (81 %, n = 71/88) and physical function (75 %, n = 56/74). Social factors were less frequently reported to have an association with or effect on pain (57 %, n = 46/81) and physical function (50 %, n = 18/36).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Psychosocial factors are often associated with clinical outcomes for people with knee osteoarthritis. High-quality longitudinal studies examining a wide range of psychosocial factors across diverse cultural and geographical settings are key to continue informing the development of biopsychosocial models of care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"32 10","pages":"Pages 1327-1338"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424012147/pdfft?md5=1a9a5bb2ff7800be21886f97d0b23016&pid=1-s2.0-S1063458424012147-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial factors in knee osteoarthritis: Scoping review of evidence and future opportunities\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joca.2024.05.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Identify, describe and produce an evidence map of studies investigating psychosocial factors association with, or effect on, clinical outcomes for people with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Scoping review of interventional and observational studies was performed. Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycInfo and Web of Science were searched on the 15th May 2023. Screening, data extraction and analysis was performed by two independent researchers. Extracted information included characteristics of studies plus which psychosocial factors were used to investigate association with, or effect on, clinical outcome(s). Descriptive statistics summarized the study design, temporal trend, geographic distribution, frequency of each psychosocial factor and whether associations/effects were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>23,065 records were screened, with 108 studies selected. Eighty-two percent of studies (n = 89/108) were cross-sectional in design. Number of studies increased over time and spanned 28 countries. Most research originated from the Americas region (55 %, 59/108). Twenty-four psychosocial factors (11 psychological, 13 social) were identified. Depression (47 %, n = 48/102) and education (28 %, n = 29/102) were the most frequently reported psychological and social factors, respectively. Psychological factors were often reported to have an association with/effect on pain (81 %, n = 71/88) and physical function (75 %, n = 56/74). Social factors were less frequently reported to have an association with or effect on pain (57 %, n = 46/81) and physical function (50 %, n = 18/36).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Psychosocial factors are often associated with clinical outcomes for people with knee osteoarthritis. High-quality longitudinal studies examining a wide range of psychosocial factors across diverse cultural and geographical settings are key to continue informing the development of biopsychosocial models of care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"volume\":\"32 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1327-1338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424012147/pdfft?md5=1a9a5bb2ff7800be21886f97d0b23016&pid=1-s2.0-S1063458424012147-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424012147\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424012147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:识别、描述和制作证据图谱,研究心理社会因素与膝关节骨性关节炎患者临床疗效的关系或对其影响:确定、描述并绘制一份证据图,说明调查社会心理因素与膝骨关节炎患者临床疗效的关系或对临床疗效的影响的研究:方法:对干预性和观察性研究进行范围界定。于 2023 年 5 月 15 日对 Medline(Ovid)、Embase(Ovid)、CINAHL、PsycInfo 和 Web of Science 进行了检索。筛选、数据提取和分析由两名独立研究人员完成。提取的信息包括研究的特点,以及哪些社会心理因素用于调查与临床结果的关系或对临床结果的影响。描述性统计总结了研究设计、时间趋势、地理分布、每种社会心理因素的频率以及是否观察到关联/影响。82%的研究(n=89/108)采用横断面设计。研究数量随着时间的推移而增加,涉及 28 个国家。大多数研究来自美洲地区(55%,59/108)。研究发现了 24 个社会心理因素(11 个心理因素和 13 个社会因素)。抑郁(47%,n=48/102)和教育(28%,n=29/102)分别是最常报告的心理和社会因素。据报告,心理因素通常与疼痛(81%,n=71/88)和身体功能(75%,n=56/74)有关或对其产生影响。社会因素与疼痛(57%,n=46/81)和身体功能(50%,n=18/36)有关或对其有影响的报告较少:结论:社会心理因素通常与膝关节骨性关节炎患者的临床结果有关。高质量的纵向研究对不同文化和地域背景下的各种社会心理因素进行了调查,这对于继续为生物心理社会护理模式的发展提供信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychosocial factors in knee osteoarthritis: Scoping review of evidence and future opportunities

Objective

Identify, describe and produce an evidence map of studies investigating psychosocial factors association with, or effect on, clinical outcomes for people with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

Scoping review of interventional and observational studies was performed. Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycInfo and Web of Science were searched on the 15th May 2023. Screening, data extraction and analysis was performed by two independent researchers. Extracted information included characteristics of studies plus which psychosocial factors were used to investigate association with, or effect on, clinical outcome(s). Descriptive statistics summarized the study design, temporal trend, geographic distribution, frequency of each psychosocial factor and whether associations/effects were observed.

Results

23,065 records were screened, with 108 studies selected. Eighty-two percent of studies (n = 89/108) were cross-sectional in design. Number of studies increased over time and spanned 28 countries. Most research originated from the Americas region (55 %, 59/108). Twenty-four psychosocial factors (11 psychological, 13 social) were identified. Depression (47 %, n = 48/102) and education (28 %, n = 29/102) were the most frequently reported psychological and social factors, respectively. Psychological factors were often reported to have an association with/effect on pain (81 %, n = 71/88) and physical function (75 %, n = 56/74). Social factors were less frequently reported to have an association with or effect on pain (57 %, n = 46/81) and physical function (50 %, n = 18/36).

Conclusion

Psychosocial factors are often associated with clinical outcomes for people with knee osteoarthritis. High-quality longitudinal studies examining a wide range of psychosocial factors across diverse cultural and geographical settings are key to continue informing the development of biopsychosocial models of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
802
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.
期刊最新文献
Importance and challenges of randomized controlled trials: a radiologic perspective on the 5-year structural data of the FIDELITY trial. Response to the comment on 'The coexistence of diabetes, hypertension and obesity is associated with worse pain outcomes following exercise for osteoarthritis: A cohort study on 80 893 patients'. Association between thyroid function and osteoarthritis: A population-based cohort study. Osteoarthritis year in review 2024: Genetics, genomics, and epigenetics. Role of mitophagy in intervertebral disc degeneration: A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1