有认知障碍的养老院居民的疼痛患病率和疼痛管理。2014年至2018年德国五项多中心横断面调查结果。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.005
{"title":"有认知障碍的养老院居民的疼痛患病率和疼痛管理。2014年至2018年德国五项多中心横断面调查结果。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Pain management depends on continuous pain assessment and a pain concept. In particular, pain assessment and treatment are major challenges for nursing home residents (NHR) with </span>cognitive impairment (CI). Many caregivers often lack the knowledge to recognize and appropriately treat pain in this vulnerable group. Little is known about the proportion of NHR who are fundamentally dependent on external assessment for pain due to CI.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was to determine pain prevalence and management among NHR with and without CI. A second objective was to determine the proportion of NHR who are dependent on external assessment for pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Information on pain was collected from 3,437 NHR in multicenter cross-sectional surveys in 51 German nursing homes between 2014 and 2018. The presence of current pain in one-to-one interviews was determined as well as dependencies on third-party information, number of daily pain recordings, and administration of medication for pain. The analysis included a contingency table and log regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pain prevalence was 24.9% among NHR with severe CI and 40.4% among NHR without CI. Overall, 19.8% of all NHRs relied on a third-party assessment of pain. Significantly, NHR with severe CI were less likely to be classified as having pain (OR 0.51), to be assessed for pain several times a day (OR 0.53) or to receive pain medication (OR 0.55) compared with NHR without CI. No influence on pain management was shown for the type of pain assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study provides evidence of significant deficits in pain management among NHR with moderate and severe CI in nursing homes in Germany. NHR with moderate and severe CI are significantly less likely to be observed for pain or classified as pain sufferers and receive significantly less pain medication than NHR without CI. Intensive training of staff on pain management of NHR with severe CI is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"25 5","pages":"Pages 487-493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Prevalence and Pain Management in Nursing Home Residents With Cognitive Impairment. Results From Five Multicenter Cross-Sectional Surveys in Germany Between 2014 and 2018\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Pain management depends on continuous pain assessment and a pain concept. In particular, pain assessment and treatment are major challenges for nursing home residents (NHR) with </span>cognitive impairment (CI). Many caregivers often lack the knowledge to recognize and appropriately treat pain in this vulnerable group. Little is known about the proportion of NHR who are fundamentally dependent on external assessment for pain due to CI.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was to determine pain prevalence and management among NHR with and without CI. A second objective was to determine the proportion of NHR who are dependent on external assessment for pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Information on pain was collected from 3,437 NHR in multicenter cross-sectional surveys in 51 German nursing homes between 2014 and 2018. The presence of current pain in one-to-one interviews was determined as well as dependencies on third-party information, number of daily pain recordings, and administration of medication for pain. The analysis included a contingency table and log regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pain prevalence was 24.9% among NHR with severe CI and 40.4% among NHR without CI. Overall, 19.8% of all NHRs relied on a third-party assessment of pain. Significantly, NHR with severe CI were less likely to be classified as having pain (OR 0.51), to be assessed for pain several times a day (OR 0.53) or to receive pain medication (OR 0.55) compared with NHR without CI. No influence on pain management was shown for the type of pain assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study provides evidence of significant deficits in pain management among NHR with moderate and severe CI in nursing homes in Germany. NHR with moderate and severe CI are significantly less likely to be observed for pain or classified as pain sufferers and receive significantly less pain medication than NHR without CI. Intensive training of staff on pain management of NHR with severe CI is recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 487-493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001656\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛管理取决于持续的疼痛评估和疼痛概念。尤其是对于有认知障碍(CI)的疗养院居民(NHR)来说,疼痛评估和治疗是一项重大挑战。许多护理人员往往缺乏识别和适当治疗这一弱势群体疼痛的知识。人们对因认知障碍而根本依赖外部疼痛评估的 NHR 比例知之甚少:本研究旨在确定有 CI 和无 CI 的 NHR 的疼痛发生率和处理方法。第二个目标是确定因疼痛而依赖外部评估的 NHR 比例:2014 年至 2018 年期间,在德国 51 家疗养院进行的多中心横断面调查中,收集了 3437 名 NHR 的疼痛信息。在一对一访谈中确定了当前是否存在疼痛,以及对第三方信息、每日疼痛记录次数和疼痛用药的依赖性。分析包括或然率表和对数回归分析:结果:有严重 CI 的 NHR 中,疼痛发生率为 24.9%,无 CI 的 NHR 中,疼痛发生率为 40.4%。总体而言,19.8% 的 NHR 依赖第三方对疼痛进行评估。值得注意的是,与无 CI 的 NHR 相比,有严重 CI 的 NHR 被归类为疼痛(OR 0.51)、每天多次接受疼痛评估(OR 0.53)或接受止痛药物治疗(OR 0.55)的可能性较低。疼痛评估类型对疼痛管理没有影响:该研究证明,德国养老院中患有中度和重度 CI 的 NHR 在疼痛管理方面存在明显缺陷。与无 CI 的 NHR 相比,患有中度和重度 CI 的 NHR 接受疼痛观察或被归类为疼痛患者的可能性要低得多,接受的止痛药物也要少得多。建议对工作人员进行有关重度 CI NHR 疼痛管理的强化培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pain Prevalence and Pain Management in Nursing Home Residents With Cognitive Impairment. Results From Five Multicenter Cross-Sectional Surveys in Germany Between 2014 and 2018

Background

Pain management depends on continuous pain assessment and a pain concept. In particular, pain assessment and treatment are major challenges for nursing home residents (NHR) with cognitive impairment (CI). Many caregivers often lack the knowledge to recognize and appropriately treat pain in this vulnerable group. Little is known about the proportion of NHR who are fundamentally dependent on external assessment for pain due to CI.

Objective

The aim of the study was to determine pain prevalence and management among NHR with and without CI. A second objective was to determine the proportion of NHR who are dependent on external assessment for pain.

Methods

Information on pain was collected from 3,437 NHR in multicenter cross-sectional surveys in 51 German nursing homes between 2014 and 2018. The presence of current pain in one-to-one interviews was determined as well as dependencies on third-party information, number of daily pain recordings, and administration of medication for pain. The analysis included a contingency table and log regression analyses.

Results

Pain prevalence was 24.9% among NHR with severe CI and 40.4% among NHR without CI. Overall, 19.8% of all NHRs relied on a third-party assessment of pain. Significantly, NHR with severe CI were less likely to be classified as having pain (OR 0.51), to be assessed for pain several times a day (OR 0.53) or to receive pain medication (OR 0.55) compared with NHR without CI. No influence on pain management was shown for the type of pain assessment.

Conclusions

The study provides evidence of significant deficits in pain management among NHR with moderate and severe CI in nursing homes in Germany. NHR with moderate and severe CI are significantly less likely to be observed for pain or classified as pain sufferers and receive significantly less pain medication than NHR without CI. Intensive training of staff on pain management of NHR with severe CI is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Examining Preliminary Efficacy of a Qigong Intervention in Veterans with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management. Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1