用于诊断脑静脉血栓的对比增强三维黑血磁共振成像。

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING Neuroradiology Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1177/19714009241260798
Padcha Tunlayadechanont, Arin Chobaroon, Thanissara Chansakul
{"title":"用于诊断脑静脉血栓的对比增强三维黑血磁共振成像。","authors":"Padcha Tunlayadechanont, Arin Chobaroon, Thanissara Chansakul","doi":"10.1177/19714009241260798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is often under-recognized on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations without concomitant magnetic resonance venography (MRV). Contrast-enhanced black-blood MRI (BBMRI) based on a three-dimensional T1-weighted variable-flip-angle turbo spin echo sequence, one of the sequences used routinely in our practice, has the potential for detection of thrombi in patients with CVT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and enhancement patterns of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional BBMRI for the diagnosis of CVT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Contrast-enhanced BBMRI and contrast-enhanced MRV sequences of 64 patients, acquired from June 2018 to January 2021, were retrospectively reviewed by neuroradiologists for detection of CVT in each venous sinus segment. Diagnostic performance values were calculated for contrast-enhanced BBMRI based on enhancement patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 749 venous segments from 64 patients analyzed, CVT was demonstrated in 41 venous segments from 12 patients on contrast-enhanced MRV (CE MRV). Thick wall enhancement and total enhancement patterns were dominantly demonstrated in thrombosed segments. Compared with contrast-enhanced MRV, contrast-enhanced BBMRI had a patient-based sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98.1%, respectively, and a segment-based sensitivity and specificity of 87.8% and 96.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of contrast-enhanced BBMRI in detecting CVT was 92.3% (patient-based) and 57.1% (segment-based), and the negative predictive value was 100% (patient-based) and 99.3% (segment-based).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrast-enhanced BBMRI has high diagnostic performance in detection and diagnosis of CVT. This sequence may be useful to recognize CVT when dedicated CE MRV was not performed in patients with nonspecific neurological symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"738-743"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast-enhanced 3D black-blood magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis.\",\"authors\":\"Padcha Tunlayadechanont, Arin Chobaroon, Thanissara Chansakul\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009241260798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is often under-recognized on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations without concomitant magnetic resonance venography (MRV). Contrast-enhanced black-blood MRI (BBMRI) based on a three-dimensional T1-weighted variable-flip-angle turbo spin echo sequence, one of the sequences used routinely in our practice, has the potential for detection of thrombi in patients with CVT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and enhancement patterns of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional BBMRI for the diagnosis of CVT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Contrast-enhanced BBMRI and contrast-enhanced MRV sequences of 64 patients, acquired from June 2018 to January 2021, were retrospectively reviewed by neuroradiologists for detection of CVT in each venous sinus segment. Diagnostic performance values were calculated for contrast-enhanced BBMRI based on enhancement patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 749 venous segments from 64 patients analyzed, CVT was demonstrated in 41 venous segments from 12 patients on contrast-enhanced MRV (CE MRV). Thick wall enhancement and total enhancement patterns were dominantly demonstrated in thrombosed segments. Compared with contrast-enhanced MRV, contrast-enhanced BBMRI had a patient-based sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98.1%, respectively, and a segment-based sensitivity and specificity of 87.8% and 96.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of contrast-enhanced BBMRI in detecting CVT was 92.3% (patient-based) and 57.1% (segment-based), and the negative predictive value was 100% (patient-based) and 99.3% (segment-based).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrast-enhanced BBMRI has high diagnostic performance in detection and diagnosis of CVT. This sequence may be useful to recognize CVT when dedicated CE MRV was not performed in patients with nonspecific neurological symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"738-743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241260798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241260798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在没有同时进行磁共振静脉造影(MRV)的情况下,脑静脉血栓(CVT)在常规磁共振成像(MRI)检查中往往未被充分识别。基于三维 T1 加权可变翻转角度涡轮自旋回波序列的对比增强黑血磁共振成像(BBMRI)是我们常规使用的序列之一,具有检测 CVT 患者血栓的潜力。本研究旨在评估对比增强三维 BBMRI 诊断 CVT 的诊断性能和增强模式:神经放射科医生对2018年6月至2021年1月期间获得的64例患者的对比增强BBMRI和对比增强MRV序列进行了回顾性审查,以检测各静脉窦段的CVT。根据增强模式计算对比增强 BBMRI 的诊断性能值:在分析的 64 名患者的 749 个静脉节段中,对比增强 MRV(CE MRV)显示 12 名患者的 41 个静脉节段存在 CVT。血栓形成区段主要表现为厚壁强化和全强化模式。与造影剂增强 MRV 相比,造影剂增强 BBMRI 基于患者的灵敏度和特异性分别为 100% 和 98.1%,基于节段的灵敏度和特异性分别为 87.8% 和 96.2%。对比增强 BBMRI 检测 CVT 的阳性预测值为 92.3%(基于患者)和 57.1%(基于节段),阴性预测值为 100%(基于患者)和 99.3%(基于节段):对比增强 BBMRI 在检测和诊断 CVT 方面具有很高的诊断性能。结论:对比度增强 BBMRI 在检测和诊断 CVT 方面具有很高的诊断性能,在未对有非特异性神经症状的患者进行专门的 CE MRV 检查时,该序列可能有助于识别 CVT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contrast-enhanced 3D black-blood magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis.

Purpose: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is often under-recognized on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations without concomitant magnetic resonance venography (MRV). Contrast-enhanced black-blood MRI (BBMRI) based on a three-dimensional T1-weighted variable-flip-angle turbo spin echo sequence, one of the sequences used routinely in our practice, has the potential for detection of thrombi in patients with CVT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and enhancement patterns of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional BBMRI for the diagnosis of CVT.

Materials and methods: Contrast-enhanced BBMRI and contrast-enhanced MRV sequences of 64 patients, acquired from June 2018 to January 2021, were retrospectively reviewed by neuroradiologists for detection of CVT in each venous sinus segment. Diagnostic performance values were calculated for contrast-enhanced BBMRI based on enhancement patterns.

Results: Of 749 venous segments from 64 patients analyzed, CVT was demonstrated in 41 venous segments from 12 patients on contrast-enhanced MRV (CE MRV). Thick wall enhancement and total enhancement patterns were dominantly demonstrated in thrombosed segments. Compared with contrast-enhanced MRV, contrast-enhanced BBMRI had a patient-based sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98.1%, respectively, and a segment-based sensitivity and specificity of 87.8% and 96.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of contrast-enhanced BBMRI in detecting CVT was 92.3% (patient-based) and 57.1% (segment-based), and the negative predictive value was 100% (patient-based) and 99.3% (segment-based).

Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced BBMRI has high diagnostic performance in detection and diagnosis of CVT. This sequence may be useful to recognize CVT when dedicated CE MRV was not performed in patients with nonspecific neurological symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Congenital and acquired anomalies of the basilar artery: A pictorial essay. Embolization of cerebellar pial arteriovenous fistula presented with congestive edema of the brainstem and cervical cord. Diagnostic MR imaging features of hypomyelination of early myelinating structures: A case report. Direct pseudomeningocele contrast injection for spinal CSF leak localization. Ruptured thrombosed vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm treated with staged flow diverter after prediction of the rupture point by vessel wall MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1