中国一项回顾性多中心研究:利用倾向评分分析比较急性重度溃疡性结肠炎的加速和标准英夫利西单抗诱导方案。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Report Pub Date : 2024-06-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/gastro/goae051
Xinyu Liu, Hui Li, Feng Tian, Ying Xie, Xiaoqi Zhang, Min Zhi, Min Zhang, Xiaomei Song, Hong Guo, Xiaofei Li, Jie Liang, Jun Shen, Yue Li
{"title":"中国一项回顾性多中心研究:利用倾向评分分析比较急性重度溃疡性结肠炎的加速和标准英夫利西单抗诱导方案。","authors":"Xinyu Liu, Hui Li, Feng Tian, Ying Xie, Xiaoqi Zhang, Min Zhi, Min Zhang, Xiaomei Song, Hong Guo, Xiaofei Li, Jie Liang, Jun Shen, Yue Li","doi":"10.1093/gastro/goae051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal regimen of infliximab salvage in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to compare accelerated and standard infliximab induction in Chinese ASUC patients, and to explore risk factors and concrete accelerated regimens for them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from steroid-refractory ASUC patients receiving infliximab as rescue therapy at seven tertiary centers across China. Outcomes including colectomy and clinical remission (Mayo score ≤ 2 and every subscore ≤ 1 at Day 14) rates were compared between patients receiving accelerated and standard infliximab induction using propensity score adjustment for potential confounders. The dose-response relationship was explored by plotting restricted cubic splines. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for adverse outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients were analysed: 29 received standard and 47 received accelerated induction. The accelerated group had a higher 90-day colectomy rate (17.8% vs 0%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.019) and lower clinical remission rate (27.7% vs 65.5%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.001). After adjusting for propensity score and institution, there was no significant difference in colectomy or clinical remission rates (both <i>P </i>><i> </i>0.05). Dose-effect curves showed decreased colectomy hazard with higher cumulative infliximab dosage within 5 days, with no improvement observed for increasing cumulative infliximab dosage within 28 days. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed C-reactive protein of >10 mg/L at infliximab initiation (odds ratio = 5.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-24.34) as an independent risk factor for no clinical remission. Meta-analysis also revealed no significant difference in colectomy rates at 3 months (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjusting for confounders, there were no significant differences in colectomy or clinical remission rates between accelerated and standard infliximab induction among ASUC patients. Early administration of an intensified dosage within 5 days may be beneficial. Elevated C-reactive protein at infliximab initiation indicated need for intensive treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54275,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Report","volume":"12 ","pages":"goae051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of accelerated and standard infliximab induction regimens in acute severe ulcerative colitis using propensity score analysis: a retrospective multicenter study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Liu, Hui Li, Feng Tian, Ying Xie, Xiaoqi Zhang, Min Zhi, Min Zhang, Xiaomei Song, Hong Guo, Xiaofei Li, Jie Liang, Jun Shen, Yue Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gastro/goae051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal regimen of infliximab salvage in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to compare accelerated and standard infliximab induction in Chinese ASUC patients, and to explore risk factors and concrete accelerated regimens for them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from steroid-refractory ASUC patients receiving infliximab as rescue therapy at seven tertiary centers across China. Outcomes including colectomy and clinical remission (Mayo score ≤ 2 and every subscore ≤ 1 at Day 14) rates were compared between patients receiving accelerated and standard infliximab induction using propensity score adjustment for potential confounders. The dose-response relationship was explored by plotting restricted cubic splines. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for adverse outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients were analysed: 29 received standard and 47 received accelerated induction. The accelerated group had a higher 90-day colectomy rate (17.8% vs 0%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.019) and lower clinical remission rate (27.7% vs 65.5%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.001). After adjusting for propensity score and institution, there was no significant difference in colectomy or clinical remission rates (both <i>P </i>><i> </i>0.05). Dose-effect curves showed decreased colectomy hazard with higher cumulative infliximab dosage within 5 days, with no improvement observed for increasing cumulative infliximab dosage within 28 days. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed C-reactive protein of >10 mg/L at infliximab initiation (odds ratio = 5.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-24.34) as an independent risk factor for no clinical remission. Meta-analysis also revealed no significant difference in colectomy rates at 3 months (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjusting for confounders, there were no significant differences in colectomy or clinical remission rates between accelerated and standard infliximab induction among ASUC patients. Early administration of an intensified dosage within 5 days may be beneficial. Elevated C-reactive protein at infliximab initiation indicated need for intensive treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Report\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"goae051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162152/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goae051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Report","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goae051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性重症溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)患者使用英夫利西单抗治疗的最佳方案仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较中国急性重症溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)患者的英夫利西单抗诱导加速方案和标准方案,并探讨其风险因素和具体的加速方案:方法:本研究回顾性收集了在中国七家三级医疗中心接受英夫利西单抗作为抢救治疗的类固醇难治性ASUC患者的数据。通过倾向评分调整潜在混杂因素,比较了接受加速和标准英夫利西单抗诱导治疗的患者的结局,包括结肠切除术和临床缓解率(第14天时梅奥评分≤2,且每个子评分≤1)。通过绘制限制性立方样条来探讨剂量-反应关系。进行了逻辑回归和 Cox 比例危险回归分析,以确定不良结局的风险因素。此外,还进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:共对 76 名患者进行了分析:29 人接受了标准诱导,47 人接受了加速诱导。加速组的 90 天结肠切除率较高(17.8% 对 0%,P = 0.019),临床缓解率较低(27.7% 对 65.5%,P = 0.001)。在对倾向评分和机构进行调整后,结肠切除率和临床缓解率没有显著差异(P 均大于 0.05)。剂量效应曲线显示,5天内英夫利西单抗累积剂量越高,结肠切除术的风险越低,28天内英夫利西单抗累积剂量越高,结肠切除术的风险越低。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,开始使用英夫利西单抗时C反应蛋白>10毫克/升(几率比=5.00,95%置信区间:1.27-24.34)是临床症状未缓解的独立风险因素。Meta分析还显示,3个月的结肠切除率无显著差异(P = 0.54):在调整了混杂因素后,ASUC 患者的结肠切除率或临床缓解率在加速和标准英夫利西单抗诱导之间没有明显差异。在5天内尽早加大剂量可能有益。开始使用英夫利西单抗时C反应蛋白升高表明需要加强治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of accelerated and standard infliximab induction regimens in acute severe ulcerative colitis using propensity score analysis: a retrospective multicenter study in China.

Background: The optimal regimen of infliximab salvage in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to compare accelerated and standard infliximab induction in Chinese ASUC patients, and to explore risk factors and concrete accelerated regimens for them.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from steroid-refractory ASUC patients receiving infliximab as rescue therapy at seven tertiary centers across China. Outcomes including colectomy and clinical remission (Mayo score ≤ 2 and every subscore ≤ 1 at Day 14) rates were compared between patients receiving accelerated and standard infliximab induction using propensity score adjustment for potential confounders. The dose-response relationship was explored by plotting restricted cubic splines. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for adverse outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was also performed.

Results: A total of 76 patients were analysed: 29 received standard and 47 received accelerated induction. The accelerated group had a higher 90-day colectomy rate (17.8% vs 0%, P =0.019) and lower clinical remission rate (27.7% vs 65.5%, P =0.001). After adjusting for propensity score and institution, there was no significant difference in colectomy or clinical remission rates (both P >0.05). Dose-effect curves showed decreased colectomy hazard with higher cumulative infliximab dosage within 5 days, with no improvement observed for increasing cumulative infliximab dosage within 28 days. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed C-reactive protein of >10 mg/L at infliximab initiation (odds ratio = 5.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-24.34) as an independent risk factor for no clinical remission. Meta-analysis also revealed no significant difference in colectomy rates at 3 months (P =0.54).

Conclusions: After adjusting for confounders, there were no significant differences in colectomy or clinical remission rates between accelerated and standard infliximab induction among ASUC patients. Early administration of an intensified dosage within 5 days may be beneficial. Elevated C-reactive protein at infliximab initiation indicated need for intensive treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Report
Gastroenterology Report Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Report is an international fully open access (OA) online only journal, covering all areas related to gastrointestinal sciences, including studies of the alimentary tract, liver, biliary, pancreas, enteral nutrition and related fields. The journal aims to publish high quality research articles on both basic and clinical gastroenterology, authoritative reviews that bring together new advances in the field, as well as commentaries and highlight pieces that provide expert analysis of topical issues.
期刊最新文献
TNFSF15 variant predicts disease progression in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease. Supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in patients with chronic functional constipation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial. New perspectives in liver diseases with challenges. A comprehensive review and update on acute severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding in Crohn's disease: a management algorithm. Gasdermin E mediates pyroptosis in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma: a double-edged sword.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1