长期护理与近视:私人保险的最佳线性补贴

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Public Economic Theory Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1111/jpet.12702
Rosita Jasaityte, Justina Klimaviciute
{"title":"长期护理与近视:私人保险的最佳线性补贴","authors":"Rosita Jasaityte,&nbsp;Justina Klimaviciute","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper studies optimal linear policy directed at private long-term care insurance in the context where individuals are myopic, that is, underestimate their dependency risk. Without government intervention, myopic individuals underinsure, while the first-best optimum requires full insurance. To decentralize the first-best, one needs personalized linear subsidies on private insurance premiums combined with personalized lump-sum taxes to finance these subsidies and redistribute resources among individuals. In the second-best setting where only uniform instruments can be used, the determination of the optimal insurance subsidy rate includes three main considerations: standard efficiency concern, correction for myopia, and redistributive concerns. While the correction for myopia pushes for a higher subsidy rate, the analysis of the redistributive concerns is far less straightforward. Overall, the redistributive concerns depend on three main factors: whether wealthier individuals are less myopic, how the probability of dependency varies with wealth and what is the type of absolute risk aversion exhibited by individual preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term care and myopia: Optimal linear subsidies for private insurance\",\"authors\":\"Rosita Jasaityte,&nbsp;Justina Klimaviciute\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpet.12702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper studies optimal linear policy directed at private long-term care insurance in the context where individuals are myopic, that is, underestimate their dependency risk. Without government intervention, myopic individuals underinsure, while the first-best optimum requires full insurance. To decentralize the first-best, one needs personalized linear subsidies on private insurance premiums combined with personalized lump-sum taxes to finance these subsidies and redistribute resources among individuals. In the second-best setting where only uniform instruments can be used, the determination of the optimal insurance subsidy rate includes three main considerations: standard efficiency concern, correction for myopia, and redistributive concerns. While the correction for myopia pushes for a higher subsidy rate, the analysis of the redistributive concerns is far less straightforward. Overall, the redistributive concerns depend on three main factors: whether wealthier individuals are less myopic, how the probability of dependency varies with wealth and what is the type of absolute risk aversion exhibited by individual preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Economic Theory\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Economic Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpet.12702\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpet.12702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了在个人近视,即低估其依赖风险的情况下,针对私人长期护理保险的最优线性政策。在没有政府干预的情况下,近视者会投保不足,而第一最优则需要全额投保。要实现第一最优的分散化,就需要对私人保险保费进行个性化的线性补贴,再加上个性化的一次性税收,以资助这些补贴并在个人之间重新分配资源。在只能使用统一工具的次优设置中,确定最佳保险补贴率主要考虑三个方面:标准效率问题、近视矫正问题和再分配问题。对近视的矫正会推动补贴率的提高,而对再分配问题的分析则没有那么简单。总体而言,再分配问题取决于三个主要因素:较富裕的人近视程度是否较低、受抚养概率随财富的变化情况以及个人偏好所表现出的绝对风险规避类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term care and myopia: Optimal linear subsidies for private insurance

This paper studies optimal linear policy directed at private long-term care insurance in the context where individuals are myopic, that is, underestimate their dependency risk. Without government intervention, myopic individuals underinsure, while the first-best optimum requires full insurance. To decentralize the first-best, one needs personalized linear subsidies on private insurance premiums combined with personalized lump-sum taxes to finance these subsidies and redistribute resources among individuals. In the second-best setting where only uniform instruments can be used, the determination of the optimal insurance subsidy rate includes three main considerations: standard efficiency concern, correction for myopia, and redistributive concerns. While the correction for myopia pushes for a higher subsidy rate, the analysis of the redistributive concerns is far less straightforward. Overall, the redistributive concerns depend on three main factors: whether wealthier individuals are less myopic, how the probability of dependency varies with wealth and what is the type of absolute risk aversion exhibited by individual preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
36.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Association of Public Economic Theory, Journal of Public Economic Theory (JPET) is dedicated to stimulating research in the rapidly growing field of public economics. Submissions are judged on the basis of their creativity and rigor, and the Journal imposes neither upper nor lower boundary on the complexity of the techniques employed. This journal focuses on such topics as public goods, local public goods, club economies, externalities, taxation, growth, public choice, social and public decision making, voting, market failure, regulation, project evaluation, equity, and political systems.
期刊最新文献
Norms and Efficiency in a Multi-Group Society: An Online Experiment Issue Information Matching Versus Raffles as a Fund-Raising Device Notions of Rank Efficiency for the Random Assignment Problem Transmissible diseases, vaccination, and inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1