出于安全考虑,降低多发性硬化症患者病情缓解疗法的等级:从奥克立珠单抗转为富马酸双嘧达莫的 25 名患者的 1 年疗效特征。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-02902-0
Mark Gudesblatt, Barbara Bumstead, Marijean Buhse, Myassar Zarif, Sarah A. Morrow, Jacqueline A. Nicholas, Laura M. Hancock, Jeffrey Wilken, Joanna Weller, Nicole Scott, Anne Gocke, James B. Lewin, Olivia Kaczmarek, Jason P. Mendoza, Daniel Golan
{"title":"出于安全考虑,降低多发性硬化症患者病情缓解疗法的等级:从奥克立珠单抗转为富马酸双嘧达莫的 25 名患者的 1 年疗效特征。","authors":"Mark Gudesblatt,&nbsp;Barbara Bumstead,&nbsp;Marijean Buhse,&nbsp;Myassar Zarif,&nbsp;Sarah A. Morrow,&nbsp;Jacqueline A. Nicholas,&nbsp;Laura M. Hancock,&nbsp;Jeffrey Wilken,&nbsp;Joanna Weller,&nbsp;Nicole Scott,&nbsp;Anne Gocke,&nbsp;James B. Lewin,&nbsp;Olivia Kaczmarek,&nbsp;Jason P. Mendoza,&nbsp;Daniel Golan","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02902-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Switching disease-modifying therapy (DMT) may be considered for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) if a patient’s current therapy is no longer optimal. This was particularly important during the recent COVID-19 pandemic because of considerations around immune deficiency and impaired vaccine response associated with B cell-depleting DMTs. This real-world, single-center study aimed to evaluate change or decline in functional ability and overall disease stability in people with RRMS who were switched from B cell-depleting ocrelizumab (OCRE) to diroximel fumarate (DRF) because of safety concern related to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adults with RRMS were included if they had been clinically stable for ≥ 1 year on OCRE. Data collected at baseline and 1 year post switch included relapse rate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), blood work for assessment of peripheral immune parameters, the Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 25) had a mean (SD) age of 52 (9) years, and a mean (SD) duration of 26 (8) months’ treatment with OCRE before the switch to DRF. Median washout duration since the last OCRE infusion was 7 months (range 4–18 months). No participants relapsed on DRF during follow-up, and all remained persistent on DRF after 1 year. There were no significant changes in peripheral immune parameters, other than an increase in the percentage of CD19<sup>+</sup> cells 1 year after switching (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant changes in CAB, OCT, and PROs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These preliminary findings suggest that transition to DRF from OCRE may be an effective treatment option for people with RRMS who are clinically stable but may need to switch for reasons unrelated to effectiveness. Longer follow-up times on larger samples are needed to confirm these observations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11263251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De-escalation of Disease-Modifying Therapy for People with Multiple Sclerosis Due to Safety Considerations: Characterizing 1-Year Outcomes in 25 People Who Switched from Ocrelizumab to Diroximel Fumarate\",\"authors\":\"Mark Gudesblatt,&nbsp;Barbara Bumstead,&nbsp;Marijean Buhse,&nbsp;Myassar Zarif,&nbsp;Sarah A. Morrow,&nbsp;Jacqueline A. Nicholas,&nbsp;Laura M. Hancock,&nbsp;Jeffrey Wilken,&nbsp;Joanna Weller,&nbsp;Nicole Scott,&nbsp;Anne Gocke,&nbsp;James B. Lewin,&nbsp;Olivia Kaczmarek,&nbsp;Jason P. Mendoza,&nbsp;Daniel Golan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-02902-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Switching disease-modifying therapy (DMT) may be considered for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) if a patient’s current therapy is no longer optimal. This was particularly important during the recent COVID-19 pandemic because of considerations around immune deficiency and impaired vaccine response associated with B cell-depleting DMTs. This real-world, single-center study aimed to evaluate change or decline in functional ability and overall disease stability in people with RRMS who were switched from B cell-depleting ocrelizumab (OCRE) to diroximel fumarate (DRF) because of safety concern related to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adults with RRMS were included if they had been clinically stable for ≥ 1 year on OCRE. Data collected at baseline and 1 year post switch included relapse rate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), blood work for assessment of peripheral immune parameters, the Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 25) had a mean (SD) age of 52 (9) years, and a mean (SD) duration of 26 (8) months’ treatment with OCRE before the switch to DRF. Median washout duration since the last OCRE infusion was 7 months (range 4–18 months). No participants relapsed on DRF during follow-up, and all remained persistent on DRF after 1 year. There were no significant changes in peripheral immune parameters, other than an increase in the percentage of CD19<sup>+</sup> cells 1 year after switching (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant changes in CAB, OCT, and PROs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These preliminary findings suggest that transition to DRF from OCRE may be an effective treatment option for people with RRMS who are clinically stable but may need to switch for reasons unrelated to effectiveness. Longer follow-up times on larger samples are needed to confirm these observations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11263251/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02902-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02902-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:如果患者目前的治疗效果不再理想,可以考虑对复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者转换疾病修饰疗法(DMT)。这在最近的 COVID-19 大流行中尤为重要,因为考虑到免疫缺陷和与 B 细胞损耗型 DMT 相关的疫苗反应受损。这项真实世界的单中心研究旨在评估因 COVID-19 大流行引起的安全问题而从 B 细胞清除型奥克立珠单抗(OCRE)转为富马酸双羟萘胺(DRF)的 RRMS 患者在功能能力和总体疾病稳定性方面的变化或下降情况:方法:纳入服用OCRE临床稳定≥1年的RRMS成人患者。在基线和转换后 1 年收集的数据包括复发率、磁共振成像 (MRI)、评估外周免疫参数的血液检查、认知评估电池 (CAB)、光学相干断层扫描 (OCT) 和患者报告结果 (PROs):参与者(N = 25)的平均(标清)年龄为 52(9)岁,在转用 DRF 之前接受 OCRE 治疗的平均(标清)时间为 26(8)个月。最后一次输注 OCRE 后的中位停药时间为 7 个月(4-18 个月)。在随访期间,没有人因使用 DRF 而复发,所有患者在使用 DRF 1 年后仍未复发。除了 CD19+ 细胞的比例在转用 DRF 1 年后有所增加外,外周免疫参数没有发生明显变化(p 结论:转用 DRF 1 年后,CD19+ 细胞的比例没有发生明显变化:这些初步研究结果表明,对于临床病情稳定但可能因与疗效无关的原因而需要转用DRF的RRMS患者来说,从OCRE转用DRF可能是一种有效的治疗选择。需要对更大样本进行更长时间的随访来证实这些观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
De-escalation of Disease-Modifying Therapy for People with Multiple Sclerosis Due to Safety Considerations: Characterizing 1-Year Outcomes in 25 People Who Switched from Ocrelizumab to Diroximel Fumarate

Introduction

Switching disease-modifying therapy (DMT) may be considered for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) if a patient’s current therapy is no longer optimal. This was particularly important during the recent COVID-19 pandemic because of considerations around immune deficiency and impaired vaccine response associated with B cell-depleting DMTs. This real-world, single-center study aimed to evaluate change or decline in functional ability and overall disease stability in people with RRMS who were switched from B cell-depleting ocrelizumab (OCRE) to diroximel fumarate (DRF) because of safety concern related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Adults with RRMS were included if they had been clinically stable for ≥ 1 year on OCRE. Data collected at baseline and 1 year post switch included relapse rate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), blood work for assessment of peripheral immune parameters, the Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Results

Participants (N = 25) had a mean (SD) age of 52 (9) years, and a mean (SD) duration of 26 (8) months’ treatment with OCRE before the switch to DRF. Median washout duration since the last OCRE infusion was 7 months (range 4–18 months). No participants relapsed on DRF during follow-up, and all remained persistent on DRF after 1 year. There were no significant changes in peripheral immune parameters, other than an increase in the percentage of CD19+ cells 1 year after switching (p < 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant changes in CAB, OCT, and PROs.

Conclusion

These preliminary findings suggest that transition to DRF from OCRE may be an effective treatment option for people with RRMS who are clinically stable but may need to switch for reasons unrelated to effectiveness. Longer follow-up times on larger samples are needed to confirm these observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Claims Analysis of the Rate of Complications in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Patients Diagnosed with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Real-World Study in the USA, Europe and Japan. Dosing Patterns of Dulaglutide and Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France and Italy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmaceutical-Grade Chondroitin Sulfate for Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Individual Patient Data from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Sacral and Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation for the Management of Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1