急性缺血性脑卒中患者的阴离子间隙和白蛋白校正阴离子间隙与急性肾损伤的关系。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.17219/acem/186814
Haiqian Yao, Jianan Tian, Shi Cheng
{"title":"急性缺血性脑卒中患者的阴离子间隙和白蛋白校正阴离子间隙与急性肾损伤的关系。","authors":"Haiqian Yao, Jianan Tian, Shi Cheng","doi":"10.17219/acem/186814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) has become a common complication of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and may have a significant impact on clinical outcomes. Anion gap (AG)/albumin corrected anion gap (ACAG) are used to assess acid-base balance status and help identify the severity of metabolic acidosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the association of AG and ACAG with the risk of AKI in AIS patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of AIS patients in this retrospective cohort study were extracted from the electronic ICU (eICU) databases (2014-2015). The outcome was the occurrence of AKI after ICU admission. The covariates included demographic data, vital signs, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and medication use. The association of AG and ACAG levels with AKI risk in AIS patients was evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The predictive performance of AG and ACAG for the risk of AKI in AIS patients was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC). To further explore the association of AG and ACAG levels with AKI risk, subgroup analyses were performed according to comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,260 AIS patients, 546 (43%) developed AKI. Elevated AG (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.32-2.29) and ACAG (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.21-2.04) were associated with the risk of AKI in AIS patients. The AUC of ACAG was superior to AG for predicting the risk of AKI (0.581 vs 0.558; p = 0.024). Elevated ACAG levels were associated with the risk of AKI in AIS patients without ischemic heart disease (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.19-2.15), diabetes (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.19-2.10) and hypertension (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.24-2.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Albumin corrected anion gap was a better predictor than AG for AKI risk in AIS patients, which may help clinicians identify high-risk patients for AKI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of anion gap and albumin corrected anion gap with acute kidney injury in patients with acute ischemic stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Haiqian Yao, Jianan Tian, Shi Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/acem/186814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) has become a common complication of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and may have a significant impact on clinical outcomes. Anion gap (AG)/albumin corrected anion gap (ACAG) are used to assess acid-base balance status and help identify the severity of metabolic acidosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the association of AG and ACAG with the risk of AKI in AIS patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of AIS patients in this retrospective cohort study were extracted from the electronic ICU (eICU) databases (2014-2015). The outcome was the occurrence of AKI after ICU admission. The covariates included demographic data, vital signs, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and medication use. The association of AG and ACAG levels with AKI risk in AIS patients was evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The predictive performance of AG and ACAG for the risk of AKI in AIS patients was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC). To further explore the association of AG and ACAG levels with AKI risk, subgroup analyses were performed according to comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,260 AIS patients, 546 (43%) developed AKI. Elevated AG (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.32-2.29) and ACAG (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.21-2.04) were associated with the risk of AKI in AIS patients. The AUC of ACAG was superior to AG for predicting the risk of AKI (0.581 vs 0.558; p = 0.024). Elevated ACAG levels were associated with the risk of AKI in AIS patients without ischemic heart disease (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.19-2.15), diabetes (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.19-2.10) and hypertension (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.24-2.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Albumin corrected anion gap was a better predictor than AG for AKI risk in AIS patients, which may help clinicians identify high-risk patients for AKI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/186814\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/186814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)已成为急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的常见并发症,可能对临床预后产生重大影响。阴离子间隙(AG)/白蛋白校正阴离子间隙(ACAG)用于评估酸碱平衡状态,有助于确定代谢性酸中毒的严重程度:探讨AG和ACAG与重症监护室(ICU)收治的AIS患者发生AKI风险的关系:这项回顾性队列研究中的AIS患者数据来自重症监护室(eICU)电子数据库(2014-2015年)。研究结果为入院后发生 AKI。协变量包括人口统计学数据、生命体征、合并症、实验室参数和用药情况。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型评估了AIS患者AG和ACAG水平与AKI风险的关系,并得出了几率比(OR)和95%置信区间(95% CI)。用曲线下面积(AUC)评估了AG和ACAG对AIS患者AKI风险的预测性能。为进一步探讨AG和ACAG水平与AKI风险的关系,根据合并症进行了亚组分析:在 1260 名 AIS 患者中,有 546 人(43%)发生了 AKI。AG(OR = 1.73,95% CI:1.32-2.29)和 ACAG(OR = 1.57,95% CI:1.21-2.04)升高与 AIS 患者发生 AKI 的风险有关。在预测 AKI 风险方面,ACAG 的 AUC 值优于 AG 值(0.581 vs 0.558; p = 0.024)。在无缺血性心脏病(OR = 1.60,95% CI:1.19-2.15)、糖尿病(OR = 1.58,95% CI:1.19-2.10)和高血压(OR = 1.69,95% CI:1.24-2.30)的 AIS 患者中,ACAG 水平升高与 AKI 风险相关:白蛋白校正阴离子间隙比AG更能预测AIS患者发生AKI的风险,这可能有助于临床医生识别发生AKI的高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of anion gap and albumin corrected anion gap with acute kidney injury in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) has become a common complication of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and may have a significant impact on clinical outcomes. Anion gap (AG)/albumin corrected anion gap (ACAG) are used to assess acid-base balance status and help identify the severity of metabolic acidosis.

Objectives: To explore the association of AG and ACAG with the risk of AKI in AIS patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Material and methods: Data of AIS patients in this retrospective cohort study were extracted from the electronic ICU (eICU) databases (2014-2015). The outcome was the occurrence of AKI after ICU admission. The covariates included demographic data, vital signs, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and medication use. The association of AG and ACAG levels with AKI risk in AIS patients was evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The predictive performance of AG and ACAG for the risk of AKI in AIS patients was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC). To further explore the association of AG and ACAG levels with AKI risk, subgroup analyses were performed according to comorbidities.

Results: Of the 1,260 AIS patients, 546 (43%) developed AKI. Elevated AG (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.32-2.29) and ACAG (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.21-2.04) were associated with the risk of AKI in AIS patients. The AUC of ACAG was superior to AG for predicting the risk of AKI (0.581 vs 0.558; p = 0.024). Elevated ACAG levels were associated with the risk of AKI in AIS patients without ischemic heart disease (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.19-2.15), diabetes (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.19-2.10) and hypertension (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.24-2.30).

Conclusions: Albumin corrected anion gap was a better predictor than AG for AKI risk in AIS patients, which may help clinicians identify high-risk patients for AKI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
期刊最新文献
Antigravity treadmill training after knee surgery: A scoping review. Evaluation of optical and mechanical properties of crown materials produced by 3D printing. Identification of a pyroptosis-related long noncoding RNA signature for determining the prognosis and immune status of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Microbial metabolomics in acute myeloid leukemia: From pathogenesis to treatment. Nerolidol inhibits proliferation and triggers ROS-facilitated apoptosis in lung carcinoma cells via the suppression of MAPK/STAT3/NF-κB and P13K/AKT pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1