共同设计和改进优化产前教育课程,使妇女更好地了解情况,为分娩和生产做好准备。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002731
Abi Merriel, Miriam Toolan, Mary Lynch, Gemma Clayton, Andrew Demetri, Lucy Willis, Narendra Mampitiya, Alice Clarke, Katherine Birchenall, Chloe de Souza, Emma Harvey, Tamarind Russell-Webster, Eva Larkai, Mariusz Grzeda, Kate Rawling, Sonia Barnfield, Margaret Smith, Rachel Plachcinski, Christy Burden, Abigail Fraser, Michael Larkin, Anna Davies
{"title":"共同设计和改进优化产前教育课程,使妇女更好地了解情况,为分娩和生产做好准备。","authors":"Abi Merriel, Miriam Toolan, Mary Lynch, Gemma Clayton, Andrew Demetri, Lucy Willis, Narendra Mampitiya, Alice Clarke, Katherine Birchenall, Chloe de Souza, Emma Harvey, Tamarind Russell-Webster, Eva Larkai, Mariusz Grzeda, Kate Rawling, Sonia Barnfield, Margaret Smith, Rachel Plachcinski, Christy Burden, Abigail Fraser, Michael Larkin, Anna Davies","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to codesign, implement, evaluate acceptability and refine an optimised antenatal education session to improve birth preparedness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>There were four distinct phases: codesign (focus groups and codesign workshops with parents and staff); implementation of intervention; evaluation (interviews, questionnaires, structured feedback forms) and systematic refinement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was set in a single maternity unit with approximately 5500 births annually.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Postnatal and antenatal women/birthing people and birth partners were invited to participate in the intervention, and midwives were invited to deliver it. Both groups participated in feedback.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>We report on whether the optimised session is deliverable, acceptable, meets the needs of women/birthing people and partners, and explain how the intervention was refined with input from parents, clinicians and researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The codesign was undertaken by 35 women, partners and clinicians. Five midwives were trained and delivered 19 antenatal education (ACE) sessions to 142 women and 94 partners. 121 women and 33 birth partners completed the feedback questionnaire. Women/birthing people (79%) and birth partners (82%) felt more prepared after the class with most participants finding the content very helpful or helpful. Women/birthing people perceived classes were more useful and engaging than their partners. Interviews with 21 parents, a midwife focus group and a structured feedback form resulted in 38 recommended changes: 22 by parents, 5 by midwives and 11 by both. Suggested changes have been incorporated in the training resources to achieve an optimised intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engaging stakeholders (women and staff) in codesigning an evidence-informed curriculum resulted in an antenatal class designed to improve preparedness for birth, including assisted birth, that is acceptable to women and their birthing partners, and has been refined to address feedback and is deliverable within National Health Service resource constraints. A nationally mandated antenatal education curriculum is needed to ensure parents receive high-quality antenatal education that targets birth preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Codesign and refinement of an optimised antenatal education session to better inform women and prepare them for labour and birth.\",\"authors\":\"Abi Merriel, Miriam Toolan, Mary Lynch, Gemma Clayton, Andrew Demetri, Lucy Willis, Narendra Mampitiya, Alice Clarke, Katherine Birchenall, Chloe de Souza, Emma Harvey, Tamarind Russell-Webster, Eva Larkai, Mariusz Grzeda, Kate Rawling, Sonia Barnfield, Margaret Smith, Rachel Plachcinski, Christy Burden, Abigail Fraser, Michael Larkin, Anna Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to codesign, implement, evaluate acceptability and refine an optimised antenatal education session to improve birth preparedness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>There were four distinct phases: codesign (focus groups and codesign workshops with parents and staff); implementation of intervention; evaluation (interviews, questionnaires, structured feedback forms) and systematic refinement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was set in a single maternity unit with approximately 5500 births annually.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Postnatal and antenatal women/birthing people and birth partners were invited to participate in the intervention, and midwives were invited to deliver it. Both groups participated in feedback.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>We report on whether the optimised session is deliverable, acceptable, meets the needs of women/birthing people and partners, and explain how the intervention was refined with input from parents, clinicians and researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The codesign was undertaken by 35 women, partners and clinicians. Five midwives were trained and delivered 19 antenatal education (ACE) sessions to 142 women and 94 partners. 121 women and 33 birth partners completed the feedback questionnaire. Women/birthing people (79%) and birth partners (82%) felt more prepared after the class with most participants finding the content very helpful or helpful. Women/birthing people perceived classes were more useful and engaging than their partners. Interviews with 21 parents, a midwife focus group and a structured feedback form resulted in 38 recommended changes: 22 by parents, 5 by midwives and 11 by both. Suggested changes have been incorporated in the training resources to achieve an optimised intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engaging stakeholders (women and staff) in codesigning an evidence-informed curriculum resulted in an antenatal class designed to improve preparedness for birth, including assisted birth, that is acceptable to women and their birthing partners, and has been refined to address feedback and is deliverable within National Health Service resource constraints. A nationally mandated antenatal education curriculum is needed to ensure parents receive high-quality antenatal education that targets birth preparedness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们的目标是编码设计、实施、评估可接受性并改进优化产前教育课程,以改善分娩准备:设计:分为四个不同的阶段:编码设计(与父母和员工进行焦点小组和编码设计研讨会);实施干预;评估(访谈、问卷调查、结构化反馈表)和系统改进:研究地点:每年约有 5500 名新生儿出生的一家产科医院:参与者:邀请产后和产前妇女/分娩者及分娩伴侣参与干预,并邀请助产士实施干预。结果测量:我们报告了优化后的课程是否可实施、可接受,是否满足了妇女/分娩者和伴侣的需求,并解释了如何根据父母、临床医生和研究人员的意见对干预措施进行改进:35 名妇女、伴侣和临床医生进行了编码设计。五名助产士接受了培训,并为 142 名妇女和 94 名伴侣提供了 19 次产前教育(ACE)课程。121 名妇女和 33 名分娩伴侣填写了反馈问卷。妇女/分娩者(79%)和分娩伴侣(82%)在课程结束后感到准备更加充分,大多数参与者认为课程内容非常有用或有用。与伴侣相比,妇女/分娩者认为课程更有用、更吸引人。通过与 21 位父母的访谈、助产士焦点小组和结构化反馈表,共提出了 38 项修改建议:22 项由父母提出,5 项由助产士提出,11 项由父母和助产士共同提出。建议的修改已纳入培训资源,以优化干预措施:通过让利益相关者(妇女和工作人员)参与设计有实证依据的课程,设计出了一套产前课程,旨在提高妇女及其分娩伴侣对分娩(包括助产)的准备程度,该课程已根据反馈意见进行了改进,并可在国家卫生服务资源有限的情况下实施。需要制定一个全国性的产前教育课程,以确保父母接受以分娩准备为目标的高质量产前教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Codesign and refinement of an optimised antenatal education session to better inform women and prepare them for labour and birth.

Objective: Our objective was to codesign, implement, evaluate acceptability and refine an optimised antenatal education session to improve birth preparedness.

Design: There were four distinct phases: codesign (focus groups and codesign workshops with parents and staff); implementation of intervention; evaluation (interviews, questionnaires, structured feedback forms) and systematic refinement.

Setting: The study was set in a single maternity unit with approximately 5500 births annually.

Participants: Postnatal and antenatal women/birthing people and birth partners were invited to participate in the intervention, and midwives were invited to deliver it. Both groups participated in feedback.

Outcome measures: We report on whether the optimised session is deliverable, acceptable, meets the needs of women/birthing people and partners, and explain how the intervention was refined with input from parents, clinicians and researchers.

Results: The codesign was undertaken by 35 women, partners and clinicians. Five midwives were trained and delivered 19 antenatal education (ACE) sessions to 142 women and 94 partners. 121 women and 33 birth partners completed the feedback questionnaire. Women/birthing people (79%) and birth partners (82%) felt more prepared after the class with most participants finding the content very helpful or helpful. Women/birthing people perceived classes were more useful and engaging than their partners. Interviews with 21 parents, a midwife focus group and a structured feedback form resulted in 38 recommended changes: 22 by parents, 5 by midwives and 11 by both. Suggested changes have been incorporated in the training resources to achieve an optimised intervention.

Conclusions: Engaging stakeholders (women and staff) in codesigning an evidence-informed curriculum resulted in an antenatal class designed to improve preparedness for birth, including assisted birth, that is acceptable to women and their birthing partners, and has been refined to address feedback and is deliverable within National Health Service resource constraints. A nationally mandated antenatal education curriculum is needed to ensure parents receive high-quality antenatal education that targets birth preparedness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Combining quality improvement and critical care training: Evaluating an ICU CPR training programme quality improvement initiative at the National Hospital in Tanzania. Improving the non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) pathway using quality improvement methodology. Achieving and sustaining reduction in hospital-acquired complications in an Australian local health service. Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum. Increasing the uptake of advance care directives through staff education and one-on-one support for people facing end-of-life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1