ST段抬高型心肌梗死后室间隔破裂患者的发病率、死亡率和临床预后趋势。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Coronary artery disease Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001401
Emily Hiltner, Marc Sandhaus, Ashish Awasthi, Abdul Hakeem, John Kassotis, Manabu Takebe, Mark Russo, Ankur Sethi
{"title":"ST段抬高型心肌梗死后室间隔破裂患者的发病率、死亡率和临床预后趋势。","authors":"Emily Hiltner, Marc Sandhaus, Ashish Awasthi, Abdul Hakeem, John Kassotis, Manabu Takebe, Mark Russo, Ankur Sethi","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite improvements in outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), ventricular septal rupture (VSR) remains a known complication, carrying high mortality. The contemporary incidence, mortality, and management of post-STEMI VSR remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Inpatient Sample database (2009-2020) was used to study trends in admissions and outcomes of post-STEMI VSR over time. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2 315 186 ± 22 888 visits for STEMI with 0.194 ± 0.01% experiencing VSR during 2009-2020 in the USA. Patients with VSR were more often older, white, female, and presented with an anterior STEMI; there was no difference in the rates of fibrinolysis. In-hospital mortality was 73.6 ± 1.8%, but only 29.2 ± 1.9 and 10 ± 1.2% received surgical repair and transcatheter repair (TCR), respectively. TCR was associated with higher and surgical repair with lower mortality. Days to surgery were longer for those who survived (5.9 ± 2.75) compared with those who died (2.44 ± 1). In a multivariable analysis, surgical repair at greater than or equal to day 4 was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mortality in post-STEMI VSR remains high with no improvement over time. Most patients are managed conservatively, and the frequency of surgical repair has decreased, while TCR has increased over the study period. Despite design limitations and survival bias, surgical repair at greater than or equal to 4 days was associated with a lower mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in the incidence, mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with ventricular septal rupture following an ST-elevation myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Hiltner, Marc Sandhaus, Ashish Awasthi, Abdul Hakeem, John Kassotis, Manabu Takebe, Mark Russo, Ankur Sethi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite improvements in outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), ventricular septal rupture (VSR) remains a known complication, carrying high mortality. The contemporary incidence, mortality, and management of post-STEMI VSR remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Inpatient Sample database (2009-2020) was used to study trends in admissions and outcomes of post-STEMI VSR over time. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2 315 186 ± 22 888 visits for STEMI with 0.194 ± 0.01% experiencing VSR during 2009-2020 in the USA. Patients with VSR were more often older, white, female, and presented with an anterior STEMI; there was no difference in the rates of fibrinolysis. In-hospital mortality was 73.6 ± 1.8%, but only 29.2 ± 1.9 and 10 ± 1.2% received surgical repair and transcatheter repair (TCR), respectively. TCR was associated with higher and surgical repair with lower mortality. Days to surgery were longer for those who survived (5.9 ± 2.75) compared with those who died (2.44 ± 1). In a multivariable analysis, surgical repair at greater than or equal to day 4 was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mortality in post-STEMI VSR remains high with no improvement over time. Most patients are managed conservatively, and the frequency of surgical repair has decreased, while TCR has increased over the study period. Despite design limitations and survival bias, surgical repair at greater than or equal to 4 days was associated with a lower mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001401\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的治疗效果有所改善,但室间隔破裂(VSR)仍是一种已知的并发症,死亡率很高。STEMI 后室间隔破裂的当代发病率、死亡率和处理方法仍不清楚:方法:使用全国住院病人抽样数据库(2009-2020 年)研究经急性介入治疗后 VSR 随时间推移的入院趋势和结果。采用调查估算指令确定加权全国估算值:结果:2009-2020年间,美国有2 315 186 ± 22 888人次因STEMI就诊,其中0.194 ± 0.01%经历了VSR。VSR患者多为老年人、白人、女性,且多为前部STEMI;纤溶率无差异。院内死亡率为73.6±1.8%,但接受手术修复和经导管修复(TCR)的分别只有29.2±1.9%和10±1.2%。经导管修补术死亡率较高,而手术修补术死亡率较低。存活者的手术天数(5.9 ± 2.75)长于死亡者(2.44 ± 1)。在多变量分析中,大于或等于第4天进行手术修复与较低的院内死亡率相关(几率比=0.39,95%置信区间:0.17-0.88):结论:STEEMI VSR术后死亡率仍然很高,且随着时间的推移没有改善。大多数患者采取保守治疗,手术修复的频率有所下降,而TCR在研究期间有所上升。尽管存在设计限制和存活率偏差,但大于或等于4天的手术修复与较低的死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in the incidence, mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with ventricular septal rupture following an ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Background: Despite improvements in outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), ventricular septal rupture (VSR) remains a known complication, carrying high mortality. The contemporary incidence, mortality, and management of post-STEMI VSR remains unclear.

Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database (2009-2020) was used to study trends in admissions and outcomes of post-STEMI VSR over time. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates.

Results: There were 2 315 186 ± 22 888 visits for STEMI with 0.194 ± 0.01% experiencing VSR during 2009-2020 in the USA. Patients with VSR were more often older, white, female, and presented with an anterior STEMI; there was no difference in the rates of fibrinolysis. In-hospital mortality was 73.6 ± 1.8%, but only 29.2 ± 1.9 and 10 ± 1.2% received surgical repair and transcatheter repair (TCR), respectively. TCR was associated with higher and surgical repair with lower mortality. Days to surgery were longer for those who survived (5.9 ± 2.75) compared with those who died (2.44 ± 1). In a multivariable analysis, surgical repair at greater than or equal to day 4 was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.88).

Conclusion: Mortality in post-STEMI VSR remains high with no improvement over time. Most patients are managed conservatively, and the frequency of surgical repair has decreased, while TCR has increased over the study period. Despite design limitations and survival bias, surgical repair at greater than or equal to 4 days was associated with a lower mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between uric acid to albumin ratio and saphenous vein graft disease in patients with coronary artery bypass graft. Impact of prior coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary lesion complexity on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. Burden of cardiovascular disease on coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalizations in the USA. Non-chest pain symptoms and likelihood of coronary occlusion in emergency department patients with ST segment elevation undergoing emergent coronary angiography. Impact of serum iron levels on in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1