急诊科护理点超声波:不同医护人员的培训、认知、应用和障碍。

IF 0.8 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of acute medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.6705/j.jacme.202406_14(2).0003
Jack Healy, Ching-Fang Tiffany Tzeng, Jon Wolfshohl, Andrew Shedd, Judy Lin, Chinmay Patel, Eric H Chou
{"title":"急诊科护理点超声波:不同医护人员的培训、认知、应用和障碍。","authors":"Jack Healy, Ching-Fang Tiffany Tzeng, Jon Wolfshohl, Andrew Shedd, Judy Lin, Chinmay Patel, Eric H Chou","doi":"10.6705/j.jacme.202406_14(2).0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool that assists in diagnosis and management of patients in the emergency department (ED) while being cost-efficient and without the use of ionizing radiation. To discern the opinions and perceptions of ED staff about POCUS applications and barriers, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of employees of 12 EDs in North Texas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed a 20-item online survey about POCUS with questions pertaining to four domains: (1) employee and training information, (2) perceived benefits, (3) common applications, and (4) barriers to use. Out of 805 eligible ED employees, 103 completed the survey (16.1% response rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated a generally positive perception of POCUS among all employee types. Physician had significant exposure and training of POCUS than non-physician group ( <i>p</i> < 0.001). Physicians tend to find cardiac assessments more useful for clinical management than non-physicians (47% vs. 23%, <i>p</i> = 0.01), while non-physicians find soft tissue/abscess assessments more useful (27% vs. 9%, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most significant barriers to POCUS use were time constraints for physicians and a lack of training for non-physician employees. Our study provides valuable insights into the perceptions of multiple ED professionals, serving as a foundation for promoting POCUS use in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":14846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acute medicine","volume":"14 2","pages":"74-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department: Training, Perceptions, Applications, and Barriers from Different Healthcare Professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Jack Healy, Ching-Fang Tiffany Tzeng, Jon Wolfshohl, Andrew Shedd, Judy Lin, Chinmay Patel, Eric H Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.6705/j.jacme.202406_14(2).0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool that assists in diagnosis and management of patients in the emergency department (ED) while being cost-efficient and without the use of ionizing radiation. To discern the opinions and perceptions of ED staff about POCUS applications and barriers, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of employees of 12 EDs in North Texas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed a 20-item online survey about POCUS with questions pertaining to four domains: (1) employee and training information, (2) perceived benefits, (3) common applications, and (4) barriers to use. Out of 805 eligible ED employees, 103 completed the survey (16.1% response rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated a generally positive perception of POCUS among all employee types. Physician had significant exposure and training of POCUS than non-physician group ( <i>p</i> < 0.001). Physicians tend to find cardiac assessments more useful for clinical management than non-physicians (47% vs. 23%, <i>p</i> = 0.01), while non-physicians find soft tissue/abscess assessments more useful (27% vs. 9%, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most significant barriers to POCUS use were time constraints for physicians and a lack of training for non-physician employees. Our study provides valuable insights into the perceptions of multiple ED professionals, serving as a foundation for promoting POCUS use in the ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of acute medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"74-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163417/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of acute medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6705/j.jacme.202406_14(2).0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acute medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6705/j.jacme.202406_14(2).0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理点超声波(POCUS)是一种宝贵的工具,可协助急诊科(ED)对患者进行诊断和管理,同时具有成本效益且不使用电离辐射。为了了解急诊科员工对 POCUS 应用和障碍的意见和看法,我们对北德克萨斯州 12 家急诊科的员工进行了横向调查:参与者完成了一项包含 20 个项目的关于 POCUS 的在线调查,调查问题涉及四个方面:(1) 员工和培训信息;(2) 感知到的益处;(3) 常见应用;(4) 使用障碍。在符合条件的 805 名教育部门员工中,有 103 人完成了调查(回复率为 16.1%):结果显示,所有类型的员工普遍对 POCUS 持积极态度。医生组比非医生组在 POCUS 方面有更多的接触和培训机会(P < 0.001)。与非医生相比,医生倾向于认为心脏评估对临床管理更有用(47% 对 23%,p = 0.01),而非医生则认为软组织/脓肿评估更有用(27% 对 9%,p = 0.01):使用 POCUS 的最大障碍是医生的时间限制和非医生员工缺乏培训。我们的研究为了解多位急诊室专业人员的看法提供了宝贵的见解,为在急诊室推广使用 POCUS 奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department: Training, Perceptions, Applications, and Barriers from Different Healthcare Professionals.

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool that assists in diagnosis and management of patients in the emergency department (ED) while being cost-efficient and without the use of ionizing radiation. To discern the opinions and perceptions of ED staff about POCUS applications and barriers, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of employees of 12 EDs in North Texas.

Methods: Participants completed a 20-item online survey about POCUS with questions pertaining to four domains: (1) employee and training information, (2) perceived benefits, (3) common applications, and (4) barriers to use. Out of 805 eligible ED employees, 103 completed the survey (16.1% response rate).

Results: The results indicated a generally positive perception of POCUS among all employee types. Physician had significant exposure and training of POCUS than non-physician group ( p < 0.001). Physicians tend to find cardiac assessments more useful for clinical management than non-physicians (47% vs. 23%, p = 0.01), while non-physicians find soft tissue/abscess assessments more useful (27% vs. 9%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion: The most significant barriers to POCUS use were time constraints for physicians and a lack of training for non-physician employees. Our study provides valuable insights into the perceptions of multiple ED professionals, serving as a foundation for promoting POCUS use in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of acute medicine
Journal of acute medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
International Collaboration in Taiwan Emergency Department Publications: A Social Network Analysis. Left Ventricular Perforation Following Transcutaneous Pigtail Catheter Placement Mimicking Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction: An Unusual Complication. Review of Emamectin Benzoate Poisoning. The Effect of a Separate Flow of Patients With Small Traumatic Injuries on Consult Time and Patient Satisfaction: A Retrospective Cohort Study During COVID-19 in the Emergency Department. Woman With Recurrent Syncope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1