Ellen Almirol, Makenna Meyer, Joseph A Mason, Aniruddha Hazra, Moira C McNulty, Kimberly A Stanford
{"title":"一家大型城市医院淋病和衣原体检测患者的 HIV 和梅毒联合筛查率。","authors":"Ellen Almirol, Makenna Meyer, Joseph A Mason, Aniruddha Hazra, Moira C McNulty, Kimberly A Stanford","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend concurrent screening for HIV and syphilis with gonorrhea and chlamydia testing. Despite this, many patients are still not screened. This study describes trends in demographics and encounter locations associated with missed opportunities for HIV and syphilis screening among patients tested for gonorrhea or chlamydia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of all encounters with gonorrhea or chlamydia testing in a large, urban hospital from November 1, 2018, to July 31, 2021. Demographic information and encounter location were extracted from the medical record. Encounters were categorized as including both HIV and syphilis (complete) screening, HIV screening only, or neither. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between demographics and encounter location and likelihood of complete screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 42,791 patient encounters, of which 40.2% had complete screening, 6.2% had concurrent HIV screening only, and 53.6% had no concurrent screening. Increasing age, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.61; P < 0.01), non-Hispanic Black race (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.49-0.55; P < 0.01), and public insurance (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.75; P < 0.01) were associated with lower odds of complete screening. Emergency department (ED) encounters were most likely to include complete screening (aOR, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.96-3.26; P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that a large proportion of patients tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia had missed opportunities for HIV and syphilis screening. Significant demographic disparities were found. The emergency department was most likely to screen for both HIV and syphilis. Decreasing disparities in screening could have profound effects on the HIV and syphilis epidemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":"728-733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HIV and Syphilis Co-Screening Rates Among Patients Tested for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia at a Large, Urban Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Almirol, Makenna Meyer, Joseph A Mason, Aniruddha Hazra, Moira C McNulty, Kimberly A Stanford\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend concurrent screening for HIV and syphilis with gonorrhea and chlamydia testing. Despite this, many patients are still not screened. This study describes trends in demographics and encounter locations associated with missed opportunities for HIV and syphilis screening among patients tested for gonorrhea or chlamydia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of all encounters with gonorrhea or chlamydia testing in a large, urban hospital from November 1, 2018, to July 31, 2021. Demographic information and encounter location were extracted from the medical record. Encounters were categorized as including both HIV and syphilis (complete) screening, HIV screening only, or neither. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between demographics and encounter location and likelihood of complete screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 42,791 patient encounters, of which 40.2% had complete screening, 6.2% had concurrent HIV screening only, and 53.6% had no concurrent screening. Increasing age, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.61; P < 0.01), non-Hispanic Black race (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.49-0.55; P < 0.01), and public insurance (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.75; P < 0.01) were associated with lower odds of complete screening. Emergency department (ED) encounters were most likely to include complete screening (aOR, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.96-3.26; P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that a large proportion of patients tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia had missed opportunities for HIV and syphilis screening. Significant demographic disparities were found. The emergency department was most likely to screen for both HIV and syphilis. Decreasing disparities in screening could have profound effects on the HIV and syphilis epidemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"728-733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560712/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001999\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前的指南建议在进行淋病和衣原体检测的同时筛查 HIV 和梅毒。尽管如此,许多患者仍未接受筛查。本研究描述了与淋病或衣原体检测患者错过 HIV 和梅毒筛查机会相关的人口统计学趋势和就诊地点:这是对一家大型城市医院自 2018 年 11 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 31 日期间进行淋病或衣原体检测的所有就诊情况的回顾性分析。人口统计学信息和就诊地点均从病历中提取。就诊情况被分为同时包括 HIV 和梅毒(完全)筛查、仅包括 HIV 筛查或两者均不包括。采用逻辑回归法检验人口统计学信息和就诊地点与完整筛查可能性之间的关联:共有 42,791 例患者就诊,其中 40.2% 的患者接受了全面筛查,6.2% 的患者只同时接受了 HIV 筛查,53.6% 的患者没有同时接受筛查。年龄的增长、女性性别(aOR 0.58,95% CI 0.55-0.61,p < 0.01)、非西班牙裔黑人种族(aOR 0.52,95% CI 0.49-0.55,p < 0.01)和公共保险(aOR 0.72,95% CI 0.69-0.75,p < 0.01)与较低的完整筛查几率相关。急诊科(ED)就诊者最有可能接受全面筛查(aOR 3.11,95% CI 2.96-3.26,p <0.01):本研究发现,大部分淋病和衣原体检测患者错过了 HIV 和梅毒筛查的机会。研究还发现了明显的人口统计学差异。急诊室最有可能同时筛查 HIV 和梅毒。减少筛查中的差异会对艾滋病和梅毒的流行产生深远影响。
HIV and Syphilis Co-Screening Rates Among Patients Tested for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia at a Large, Urban Hospital.
Background: Current guidelines recommend concurrent screening for HIV and syphilis with gonorrhea and chlamydia testing. Despite this, many patients are still not screened. This study describes trends in demographics and encounter locations associated with missed opportunities for HIV and syphilis screening among patients tested for gonorrhea or chlamydia.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of all encounters with gonorrhea or chlamydia testing in a large, urban hospital from November 1, 2018, to July 31, 2021. Demographic information and encounter location were extracted from the medical record. Encounters were categorized as including both HIV and syphilis (complete) screening, HIV screening only, or neither. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between demographics and encounter location and likelihood of complete screening.
Results: There were 42,791 patient encounters, of which 40.2% had complete screening, 6.2% had concurrent HIV screening only, and 53.6% had no concurrent screening. Increasing age, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.61; P < 0.01), non-Hispanic Black race (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.49-0.55; P < 0.01), and public insurance (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.75; P < 0.01) were associated with lower odds of complete screening. Emergency department (ED) encounters were most likely to include complete screening (aOR, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.96-3.26; P < 0.01).
Conclusions: This study found that a large proportion of patients tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia had missed opportunities for HIV and syphilis screening. Significant demographic disparities were found. The emergency department was most likely to screen for both HIV and syphilis. Decreasing disparities in screening could have profound effects on the HIV and syphilis epidemics.
期刊介绍:
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.