腰椎融合术后 10 年最小重要变化和患者可接受症状状态的异质性。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005065
Leevi A Toivonen, Jenna L C Laurén, Hannu Kautiainen, Arja H Häkkinen, Marko H Neva
{"title":"腰椎融合术后 10 年最小重要变化和患者可接受症状状态的异质性。","authors":"Leevi A Toivonen, Jenna L C Laurén, Hannu Kautiainen, Arja H Häkkinen, Marko H Neva","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate heterogeneity (fluctuation) in minimal important change (MIC) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) through 10 years after lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>PROMs have become key determinants in spine surgery outcomes studies. MIC and PASS were established to aid PROM interpretations. However, their long-term stability has not yet been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of elective lumbar fusions were followed up using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Improvement was rated by a 4-point Likert scale into \"improved\" or \"nonimproved.\" Satisfaction-to-treatment was rated by the patients' willingness to undergo surgery again. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis estimated MIC (95% confidence interval, CI) as the PROM change that best predicted improvement at distinct time-points. PASS (CI) was estimated as the lowest PROM score at which the patients were still satisfied. Heterogeneity across thresholds was evaluated using the DeLong algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MIC for ODI represented heterogeneity across 10 years, ranging from -21 (-24 to -16) at two years to -8 (-7 to -4) at five years, P<0.001. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) (0.79 to 0.85) indicated acceptable to excellent discrimination. Heterogeneity was not significant in the MICs for the pain scores. At one year, MIC for back pain was -24 (-38 to -15), AUC 0.77, and for leg pain, it was -26 (-44 to -8), AUC 0.78. No significant heterogeneity was observed in 10-year PASS scores. At 1-year, PASS for ODI was 22 (15 to 29), AUC 0.85. Similarly, the one-year PASS for back pain was 38 (20 to 56), AUC 0.81, and for leg pain, it was 49 (26 to 72), AUC 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIC for ODI fluctuated over 10 years after lumbar fusions. PASS values for all PROMs seemed most stable over time. Caution is needed when generic MIC values are used in long-term studies.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten-Year Heterogeneity of Minimal Important Change and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Lumbar Fusions.\",\"authors\":\"Leevi A Toivonen, Jenna L C Laurén, Hannu Kautiainen, Arja H Häkkinen, Marko H Neva\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate heterogeneity (fluctuation) in minimal important change (MIC) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) through 10 years after lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>PROMs have become key determinants in spine surgery outcomes studies. MIC and PASS were established to aid PROM interpretations. However, their long-term stability has not yet been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of elective lumbar fusions were followed up using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Improvement was rated by a 4-point Likert scale into \\\"improved\\\" or \\\"nonimproved.\\\" Satisfaction-to-treatment was rated by the patients' willingness to undergo surgery again. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis estimated MIC (95% confidence interval, CI) as the PROM change that best predicted improvement at distinct time-points. PASS (CI) was estimated as the lowest PROM score at which the patients were still satisfied. Heterogeneity across thresholds was evaluated using the DeLong algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MIC for ODI represented heterogeneity across 10 years, ranging from -21 (-24 to -16) at two years to -8 (-7 to -4) at five years, P<0.001. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) (0.79 to 0.85) indicated acceptable to excellent discrimination. Heterogeneity was not significant in the MICs for the pain scores. At one year, MIC for back pain was -24 (-38 to -15), AUC 0.77, and for leg pain, it was -26 (-44 to -8), AUC 0.78. No significant heterogeneity was observed in 10-year PASS scores. At 1-year, PASS for ODI was 22 (15 to 29), AUC 0.85. Similarly, the one-year PASS for back pain was 38 (20 to 56), AUC 0.81, and for leg pain, it was 49 (26 to 72), AUC 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIC for ODI fluctuated over 10 years after lumbar fusions. PASS values for all PROMs seemed most stable over time. Caution is needed when generic MIC values are used in long-term studies.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"46-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计队列研究:评估腰椎融合术后 10 年间患者报告结果(PROMs)的最小重要变化(MIC)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的异质性(波动):PROMs已成为脊柱手术疗效研究的关键决定因素。MIC 和 PASS 的建立是为了帮助解释 PROM。然而,它们的长期稳定性尚未见报道:方法:采用 Oswestry 失能指数(ODI)和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)对一系列连续的择期腰椎融合术患者进行随访。通过李克特(Likert)四点量表将改善程度分为 "改善 "或 "未改善"。治疗满意度根据患者是否愿意再次接受手术来评定。接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析估算出的 MIC(95% 置信区间,CI)是最能预测不同时间点病情改善的 PROM 变化。PASS(CI)估计为患者仍然满意的最低 PROM 分数。使用 DeLong 算法评估了不同阈值之间的异质性:结果:ODI 的 MIC 值在 10 年间表现出异质性,从 2 年的-21(-24 至-16)到 5 年的-8(-7 至-4),PC 结论:ODI 的 MIC 值在 10 年间表现出异质性,从 2 年的-21(-24 至-16)到 5 年的-8(-7 至-4):腰椎融合术后 10 年间,ODI 的 MIC 值有所波动。所有 PROMs 的 PASS 值在一段时间内似乎最为稳定。在长期研究中使用通用 MIC 值时需谨慎:证据级别:治疗III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ten-Year Heterogeneity of Minimal Important Change and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Lumbar Fusions.

Study design: Cohort study.

Objective: To evaluate heterogeneity (fluctuation) in minimal important change (MIC) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) through 10 years after lumbar fusion.

Summary of background data: PROMs have become key determinants in spine surgery outcomes studies. MIC and PASS were established to aid PROM interpretations. However, their long-term stability has not yet been reported.

Methods: A consecutive series of elective lumbar fusions were followed up using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Improvement was rated by a 4-point Likert scale into "improved" or "nonimproved." Satisfaction-to-treatment was rated by the patients' willingness to undergo surgery again. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis estimated MIC (95% confidence interval, CI) as the PROM change that best predicted improvement at distinct time-points. PASS (CI) was estimated as the lowest PROM score at which the patients were still satisfied. Heterogeneity across thresholds was evaluated using the DeLong algorithm.

Results: MIC for ODI represented heterogeneity across 10 years, ranging from -21 (-24 to -16) at two years to -8 (-7 to -4) at five years, P<0.001. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) (0.79 to 0.85) indicated acceptable to excellent discrimination. Heterogeneity was not significant in the MICs for the pain scores. At one year, MIC for back pain was -24 (-38 to -15), AUC 0.77, and for leg pain, it was -26 (-44 to -8), AUC 0.78. No significant heterogeneity was observed in 10-year PASS scores. At 1-year, PASS for ODI was 22 (15 to 29), AUC 0.85. Similarly, the one-year PASS for back pain was 38 (20 to 56), AUC 0.81, and for leg pain, it was 49 (26 to 72), AUC 0.81.

Conclusions: MIC for ODI fluctuated over 10 years after lumbar fusions. PASS values for all PROMs seemed most stable over time. Caution is needed when generic MIC values are used in long-term studies.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Temporal Trends of Improvement After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Intraoperative Hypotension Is an Important Modifiable Risk Factor for Major Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery. Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients With Long-term Follow-up. Does Paraspinal Muscle Mass Predict Lumbar Lordosis Before and After Decompression for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis? The Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in Assessing the Risk of Perioperative Complications Following Spinal Fusion Surgery for Pediatric Patients With Scoliosis and Cerebral Palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1