利用分层混合推理从 ICESat-2 数据估算北方森林生物量

IF 11.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Remote Sensing of Environment Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114249
Petri Varvia , Svetlana Saarela , Matti Maltamo , Petteri Packalen , Terje Gobakken , Erik Næsset , Göran Ståhl , Lauri Korhonen
{"title":"利用分层混合推理从 ICESat-2 数据估算北方森林生物量","authors":"Petri Varvia ,&nbsp;Svetlana Saarela ,&nbsp;Matti Maltamo ,&nbsp;Petteri Packalen ,&nbsp;Terje Gobakken ,&nbsp;Erik Næsset ,&nbsp;Göran Ståhl ,&nbsp;Lauri Korhonen","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2024.114249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ICESat-2, launched in 2018, carries the ATLAS instrument, which is a photon-counting spaceborne lidar that provides profile samples over the terrain. While primarily designed for snow and ice monitoring, there has been a great interest in using ICESat-2 to predict forest above-ground biomass density (AGBD). As ICESat-2 is on a polar orbit, it provides good spatial coverage of boreal forests.</p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the estimation of mean AGBD from ICESat-2 data using a hierarchical modeling approach combined with rigorous statistical inference. We propose a hierarchical hybrid inference approach for uncertainty quantification of the average AGBD of the area of interest estimated directly from a sample of ICESat-2 lidar profiles. Our approach models the errors coming from the multiple modeling steps, including the allometric models used for predicting tree-level AGB. For testing the procedure, we have data from two adjacent study sites, denoted Valtimo and Nurmes, of which Valtimo site is used for model training and Nurmes for validation.</p><p>The ICESat-2 estimated mean AGBD in the Nurmes validation area was 65.7 ± 1.9 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 2.9%). The local reference hierarchical model-based estimate obtained from wall-to-wall airborne lidar data was 63.9 ± 0.6 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 1.0%). The reference estimate was within the 95% confidence interval of the ICESat-2 hierarchical hybrid estimate. The small standard errors indicate that the proposed method is useful for AGBD assessment. However, some sources of error were not accounted for in the study and thus the real uncertainties are probably slightly larger than those reported.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425724002670/pdfft?md5=62dd6d1758a6f94aea59bc9a79594e10&pid=1-s2.0-S0034425724002670-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of boreal forest biomass from ICESat-2 data using hierarchical hybrid inference\",\"authors\":\"Petri Varvia ,&nbsp;Svetlana Saarela ,&nbsp;Matti Maltamo ,&nbsp;Petteri Packalen ,&nbsp;Terje Gobakken ,&nbsp;Erik Næsset ,&nbsp;Göran Ståhl ,&nbsp;Lauri Korhonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rse.2024.114249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ICESat-2, launched in 2018, carries the ATLAS instrument, which is a photon-counting spaceborne lidar that provides profile samples over the terrain. While primarily designed for snow and ice monitoring, there has been a great interest in using ICESat-2 to predict forest above-ground biomass density (AGBD). As ICESat-2 is on a polar orbit, it provides good spatial coverage of boreal forests.</p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the estimation of mean AGBD from ICESat-2 data using a hierarchical modeling approach combined with rigorous statistical inference. We propose a hierarchical hybrid inference approach for uncertainty quantification of the average AGBD of the area of interest estimated directly from a sample of ICESat-2 lidar profiles. Our approach models the errors coming from the multiple modeling steps, including the allometric models used for predicting tree-level AGB. For testing the procedure, we have data from two adjacent study sites, denoted Valtimo and Nurmes, of which Valtimo site is used for model training and Nurmes for validation.</p><p>The ICESat-2 estimated mean AGBD in the Nurmes validation area was 65.7 ± 1.9 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 2.9%). The local reference hierarchical model-based estimate obtained from wall-to-wall airborne lidar data was 63.9 ± 0.6 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 1.0%). The reference estimate was within the 95% confidence interval of the ICESat-2 hierarchical hybrid estimate. The small standard errors indicate that the proposed method is useful for AGBD assessment. However, some sources of error were not accounted for in the study and thus the real uncertainties are probably slightly larger than those reported.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425724002670/pdfft?md5=62dd6d1758a6f94aea59bc9a79594e10&pid=1-s2.0-S0034425724002670-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425724002670\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425724002670","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018年发射的ICESat-2搭载了ATLAS仪器,这是一种光子计数星载激光雷达,可提供地形剖面样本。虽然ICESat-2主要设计用于冰雪监测,但人们对利用ICESat-2预测森林地上生物量密度(AGBD)非常感兴趣。由于 ICESat-2 位于极地轨道上,因此它能很好地覆盖北方森林的空间范围。本研究的目的是利用分层建模方法结合严格的统计推断,评估 ICESat-2 数据对平均 AGBD 的估算。我们提出了一种分层混合推理方法,用于对直接从 ICESat-2 激光雷达剖面样本估算出的相关区域平均 AGBD 进行不确定性量化。我们的方法对来自多个建模步骤的误差进行了建模,包括用于预测树级 AGB 的异速模型。为了测试该程序,我们使用了两个相邻研究地点的数据,分别称为 Valtimo 和 Nurmes,其中 Valtimo 地点用于模型训练,Nurmes 地点用于验证。ICESat-2 估算的 Nurmes 验证区平均 AGBD 为 65.7 ± 1.9 兆克/公顷(相对标准误差为 2.9%)。根据壁到壁机载激光雷达数据得出的基于分层模型的当地参考估计值为 63.9 ± 0.6 兆克/公顷(相对标准误差为 1.0%)。参考估算值在 ICESat-2 分级混合估算值的 95% 置信区间内。较小的标准误差表明,建议的方法可用于 AGBD 评估。不过,研究中没有考虑到某些误差来源,因此实际的不确定性可能比报告的略大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of boreal forest biomass from ICESat-2 data using hierarchical hybrid inference

The ICESat-2, launched in 2018, carries the ATLAS instrument, which is a photon-counting spaceborne lidar that provides profile samples over the terrain. While primarily designed for snow and ice monitoring, there has been a great interest in using ICESat-2 to predict forest above-ground biomass density (AGBD). As ICESat-2 is on a polar orbit, it provides good spatial coverage of boreal forests.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the estimation of mean AGBD from ICESat-2 data using a hierarchical modeling approach combined with rigorous statistical inference. We propose a hierarchical hybrid inference approach for uncertainty quantification of the average AGBD of the area of interest estimated directly from a sample of ICESat-2 lidar profiles. Our approach models the errors coming from the multiple modeling steps, including the allometric models used for predicting tree-level AGB. For testing the procedure, we have data from two adjacent study sites, denoted Valtimo and Nurmes, of which Valtimo site is used for model training and Nurmes for validation.

The ICESat-2 estimated mean AGBD in the Nurmes validation area was 65.7 ± 1.9 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 2.9%). The local reference hierarchical model-based estimate obtained from wall-to-wall airborne lidar data was 63.9 ± 0.6 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 1.0%). The reference estimate was within the 95% confidence interval of the ICESat-2 hierarchical hybrid estimate. The small standard errors indicate that the proposed method is useful for AGBD assessment. However, some sources of error were not accounted for in the study and thus the real uncertainties are probably slightly larger than those reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing of Environment 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
455
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing. The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques. RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.
期刊最新文献
River ice breakup classification using dual- (HH&HV) or compact-polarization RADARSAT Constellation Mission data Characterizing fire and fire atmospheric states from space using collocated hyperspectral infrared sounding and narrow-band imagery Comparative validation of recent 10 m-resolution global land cover maps Automating the detection of hydrological barriers and fragmentation in wetlands using deep learning and InSAR A machine learning scheme for estimating fine-resolution grassland aboveground biomass over China with Sentinel-1/2 satellite images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1