[2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍基础上服用西格列汀对心血管的安全性]。

Q3 Medicine 北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2024-06-18
Zuoxiang Liu, Xiaowei Chen, Houyu Zhao, Siyan Zhan, Feng Sun
{"title":"[2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍基础上服用西格列汀对心血管的安全性]。","authors":"Zuoxiang Liu, Xiaowei Chen, Houyu Zhao, Siyan Zhan, Feng Sun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety of sitagliptin added to metformin on cardiovascular adverse events in real world patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Real world data from Yinzhou Regional Health Care Database were used to select T2DM patients with diagnosis and treatment records in the platform from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022. According to drug prescription records, the patients were divided into metformin plus sitagliptin group (combination group) and metformin monotherapy group(monotherapy group). A series of retrospective cohorts were constructed according to the index date.Finally, full retrospective cohorts were constructed according to propensity score model, including baseline covariates that might be related to outcomes, to match the subjects in the combination group and monotherapy group for the purpose of increasing the comparability of baseline characteristics. The participants were followed up from the index date until the first occurrence of the following events: Diagnosis of outcomes, death, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2022). Cox proportional risk model was used to estimate the hazard ratio(<i>HR</i>)and 95% confidence interval (<i>CI</i>) of sitagliptin added to metformin on 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) combination outcome and secondary cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before propensity score matching, the proportion of the patients in combination group using insulin, α glucosidase inhibitors, sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2I) and glienides at baseline was higher than that in monotherapy group, and the baseline fasting blood glucose (FBG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in combination group were higher than those in monotherapy group. After propensity score matching, 5 416 subjects were included in the combination group and the monotherapy group, and baseline characteristics were effectively balanced between the groups. The incidence densities of 3P-MACE were 6.41/100 person years and 6.35/100 person years, respectively. Sitagliptin added to metformin did not increase or decrease the risk of 3P-MACE compared with the metformin monotherapy (<i>HR</i>=1.00, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.91-1.10). In secondary outcomes analysis, the incidence of cardiovascular death was lower in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (<i>HR</i>=0.59, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.41-0.85), and no association was found between sitagliptin and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke (<i>HR</i>=1.12, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.89-1.41; <i>HR</i>=0.99, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.91-1.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In T2DM patients in Yinzhou district of Ningbo, compared with metformin alone, sitagliptin added to metformin may reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, and do not increase the incidence of overall cardiovascular events. The results of this study can provide real-world evidence for post-marketing cardiovascular safety evaluation of sitagliptin.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Cardiovascular safety of sitagliptin added to metformin in real world patients with type 2 diabetes].\",\"authors\":\"Zuoxiang Liu, Xiaowei Chen, Houyu Zhao, Siyan Zhan, Feng Sun\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety of sitagliptin added to metformin on cardiovascular adverse events in real world patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Real world data from Yinzhou Regional Health Care Database were used to select T2DM patients with diagnosis and treatment records in the platform from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022. According to drug prescription records, the patients were divided into metformin plus sitagliptin group (combination group) and metformin monotherapy group(monotherapy group). A series of retrospective cohorts were constructed according to the index date.Finally, full retrospective cohorts were constructed according to propensity score model, including baseline covariates that might be related to outcomes, to match the subjects in the combination group and monotherapy group for the purpose of increasing the comparability of baseline characteristics. The participants were followed up from the index date until the first occurrence of the following events: Diagnosis of outcomes, death, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2022). Cox proportional risk model was used to estimate the hazard ratio(<i>HR</i>)and 95% confidence interval (<i>CI</i>) of sitagliptin added to metformin on 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) combination outcome and secondary cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before propensity score matching, the proportion of the patients in combination group using insulin, α glucosidase inhibitors, sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2I) and glienides at baseline was higher than that in monotherapy group, and the baseline fasting blood glucose (FBG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in combination group were higher than those in monotherapy group. After propensity score matching, 5 416 subjects were included in the combination group and the monotherapy group, and baseline characteristics were effectively balanced between the groups. The incidence densities of 3P-MACE were 6.41/100 person years and 6.35/100 person years, respectively. Sitagliptin added to metformin did not increase or decrease the risk of 3P-MACE compared with the metformin monotherapy (<i>HR</i>=1.00, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.91-1.10). In secondary outcomes analysis, the incidence of cardiovascular death was lower in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (<i>HR</i>=0.59, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.41-0.85), and no association was found between sitagliptin and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke (<i>HR</i>=1.12, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.89-1.41; <i>HR</i>=0.99, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.91-1.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In T2DM patients in Yinzhou district of Ningbo, compared with metformin alone, sitagliptin added to metformin may reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, and do not increase the incidence of overall cardiovascular events. The results of this study can provide real-world evidence for post-marketing cardiovascular safety evaluation of sitagliptin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167558/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估西格列汀联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者心血管不良事件的安全性:采用鄞州地区医疗卫生数据库的真实数据,选取2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日平台中有诊疗记录的T2DM患者。根据药物处方记录,将患者分为二甲双胍联合西格列汀组(联合治疗组)和二甲双胍单药治疗组(单药治疗组)。最后,为了增加基线特征的可比性,根据倾向评分模型(包括可能与结局相关的基线协变量)构建了完整的回顾性队列,以匹配二甲双胍联合治疗组和二甲双胍单药治疗组的受试者。从指标日开始对受试者进行随访,直至首次发生以下事件:诊断结果、死亡或研究期结束(2022 年 12 月 31 日)。采用Cox比例风险模型估算西格列汀与二甲双胍联合治疗对3点主要心血管不良事件(3P-MACE)综合结局和次要心血管结局的危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI):倾向得分匹配前,联合治疗组基线使用胰岛素、α葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂、钠-葡萄糖转运体2抑制剂(SGLT-2I)和格列奈类药物的患者比例高于单药治疗组,联合治疗组基线空腹血糖(FBG)和血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)水平高于单药治疗组。经过倾向得分匹配后,5 416 名受试者被纳入联合治疗组和单一治疗组,各组间的基线特征得到有效平衡。3P-MACE的发生密度分别为6.41/100人年和6.35/100人年。与二甲双胍单药治疗相比,在二甲双胍基础上加用西他列汀不会增加或降低3P-MACE的风险(HR=1.00,95% CI:0.91-1.10)。在次要结果分析中,联合治疗组的心血管死亡发生率低于单药治疗组(HR=0.59,95% CI:0.41-0.85),西格列汀与心肌梗死和卒中风险之间没有关联(HR=1.12,95% CI:0.89-1.41;HR=0.99,95% CI:0.91-1.12):在宁波市鄞州区的T2DM患者中,与单用二甲双胍相比,西格列汀联合二甲双胍可降低心血管死亡风险,且不会增加总体心血管事件的发生率。该研究结果可为西他列汀上市后的心血管安全性评估提供真实世界的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Cardiovascular safety of sitagliptin added to metformin in real world patients with type 2 diabetes].

Objective: To assess the safety of sitagliptin added to metformin on cardiovascular adverse events in real world patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: Real world data from Yinzhou Regional Health Care Database were used to select T2DM patients with diagnosis and treatment records in the platform from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022. According to drug prescription records, the patients were divided into metformin plus sitagliptin group (combination group) and metformin monotherapy group(monotherapy group). A series of retrospective cohorts were constructed according to the index date.Finally, full retrospective cohorts were constructed according to propensity score model, including baseline covariates that might be related to outcomes, to match the subjects in the combination group and monotherapy group for the purpose of increasing the comparability of baseline characteristics. The participants were followed up from the index date until the first occurrence of the following events: Diagnosis of outcomes, death, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2022). Cox proportional risk model was used to estimate the hazard ratio(HR)and 95% confidence interval (CI) of sitagliptin added to metformin on 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) combination outcome and secondary cardiovascular outcomes.

Results: Before propensity score matching, the proportion of the patients in combination group using insulin, α glucosidase inhibitors, sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2I) and glienides at baseline was higher than that in monotherapy group, and the baseline fasting blood glucose (FBG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in combination group were higher than those in monotherapy group. After propensity score matching, 5 416 subjects were included in the combination group and the monotherapy group, and baseline characteristics were effectively balanced between the groups. The incidence densities of 3P-MACE were 6.41/100 person years and 6.35/100 person years, respectively. Sitagliptin added to metformin did not increase or decrease the risk of 3P-MACE compared with the metformin monotherapy (HR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.10). In secondary outcomes analysis, the incidence of cardiovascular death was lower in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.85), and no association was found between sitagliptin and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke (HR=1.12, 95% CI: 0.89-1.41; HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.91-1.12).

Conclusion: In T2DM patients in Yinzhou district of Ningbo, compared with metformin alone, sitagliptin added to metformin may reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, and do not increase the incidence of overall cardiovascular events. The results of this study can provide real-world evidence for post-marketing cardiovascular safety evaluation of sitagliptin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Clinical diagnosis and treatment of renal angiomyolipoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus]. [Clinical effects of transesophageal echocardiography in different surgical methods for nephrectomy combined with Mayo Ⅲ-Ⅳ vena tumor thrombectomy]. [Clinical treatment and prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus]. [Construction of a predictive model for postoperative pain relief after microscopic spermatic cord surgery for spermatic cord pain]. [Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and the incidence of nephrolithiasis in male individuals].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1