桡侧体外冲击波疗法对中风后患者上肢屈肌痉挛的影响:随机对照试验

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1177/02692155241258740
Tao Fan, Rong Chen, Mingyang Wei, Xiangying Zhou, Peng Zheng, Jing Zhou, Peichen He, Xiaojia Zhan, Jingyu Xie, Rongdong Li, Rihui Li, Peihua Cao, Guozhi Huang
{"title":"桡侧体外冲击波疗法对中风后患者上肢屈肌痉挛的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Tao Fan, Rong Chen, Mingyang Wei, Xiangying Zhou, Peng Zheng, Jing Zhou, Peichen He, Xiaojia Zhan, Jingyu Xie, Rongdong Li, Rihui Li, Peihua Cao, Guozhi Huang","doi":"10.1177/02692155241258740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treating upper limb spasticity after a stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This study included 95 people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The active (<i>n</i> = 47) and sham-placebo (<i>n</i> = 48) radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy groups received three treatment sessions (every third day).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The Modified Ashworth Scale, Hmax/Mmax ratio, root mean square, co-contraction ratio, mechanical parameters of the muscle and temperature were measured at baseline and days 2, 5 and 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 135 potential participants screened, 100 were enrolled and allocated randomly, with 95 participants ultimately being included in the intent-to-treat analysis dataset. The active group showed significantly better improvements in upper limb spasticity and muscle function than did the sham-placebo group. Greater improvements in the Modified Ashworth Scale were observed in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.22; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Moreover, significant differences in root mean square, co-contraction ratio and Hmax/Mmax ratio were observed between the two groups (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). The mechanical parameters of the biceps muscle were significantly better in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The active group had a higher temperature than the sham-placebo group, although the difference was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.070).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the treatment with extracorporeal shockwave therapy can relieve upper limb spasticity in people with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1200-1213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on flexor spasticity of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tao Fan, Rong Chen, Mingyang Wei, Xiangying Zhou, Peng Zheng, Jing Zhou, Peichen He, Xiaojia Zhan, Jingyu Xie, Rongdong Li, Rihui Li, Peihua Cao, Guozhi Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241258740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treating upper limb spasticity after a stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This study included 95 people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The active (<i>n</i> = 47) and sham-placebo (<i>n</i> = 48) radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy groups received three treatment sessions (every third day).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The Modified Ashworth Scale, Hmax/Mmax ratio, root mean square, co-contraction ratio, mechanical parameters of the muscle and temperature were measured at baseline and days 2, 5 and 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 135 potential participants screened, 100 were enrolled and allocated randomly, with 95 participants ultimately being included in the intent-to-treat analysis dataset. The active group showed significantly better improvements in upper limb spasticity and muscle function than did the sham-placebo group. Greater improvements in the Modified Ashworth Scale were observed in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.22; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Moreover, significant differences in root mean square, co-contraction ratio and Hmax/Mmax ratio were observed between the two groups (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). The mechanical parameters of the biceps muscle were significantly better in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The active group had a higher temperature than the sham-placebo group, although the difference was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.070).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the treatment with extracorporeal shockwave therapy can relieve upper limb spasticity in people with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1200-1213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241258740\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241258740","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估桡动脉体外冲击波疗法治疗中风后上肢痉挛的疗效:本研究旨在评估桡动脉体外冲击波疗法治疗中风后上肢痉挛的疗效:随机对照试验:南方医科大学珠江医院:本研究纳入95名脑卒中患者:积极治疗组(47人)和假安慰剂组(48人)接受三次治疗(每三天一次):在基线和第 2、5 和 8 天测量修正阿什沃斯量表、Hmax/Mmax 比值、均方根、共收缩比值、肌肉机械参数和温度:在筛选出的 135 名潜在参与者中,有 100 人被随机录取和分配,最终有 95 人被纳入意向治疗分析数据集。积极组在上肢痉挛和肌肉功能方面的改善明显优于假安慰剂组。与假安慰剂组相比,积极治疗组在 "改良阿什沃斯量表"(Modified Ashworth Scale)方面的改善幅度更大(差异为-0.45;95% CI为-0.69至-0.22;P P P P = 0.070):本研究表明,体外冲击波疗法可以缓解脑卒中患者的上肢痉挛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on flexor spasticity of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treating upper limb spasticity after a stroke.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University.

Subjects: This study included 95 people with stroke.

Intervention: The active (n = 47) and sham-placebo (n = 48) radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy groups received three treatment sessions (every third day).

Main measures: The Modified Ashworth Scale, Hmax/Mmax ratio, root mean square, co-contraction ratio, mechanical parameters of the muscle and temperature were measured at baseline and days 2, 5 and 8.

Results: Among the 135 potential participants screened, 100 were enrolled and allocated randomly, with 95 participants ultimately being included in the intent-to-treat analysis dataset. The active group showed significantly better improvements in upper limb spasticity and muscle function than did the sham-placebo group. Greater improvements in the Modified Ashworth Scale were observed in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.22; P < 0.001). Moreover, significant differences in root mean square, co-contraction ratio and Hmax/Mmax ratio were observed between the two groups (all P < 0.001). The mechanical parameters of the biceps muscle were significantly better in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (P < 0.001). The active group had a higher temperature than the sham-placebo group, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.070).

Conclusions: This study revealed that the treatment with extracorporeal shockwave therapy can relieve upper limb spasticity in people with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1