桡侧体外冲击波疗法对中风后患者上肢屈肌痉挛的影响:随机对照试验

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1177/02692155241258740
Tao Fan, Rong Chen, Mingyang Wei, Xiangying Zhou, Peng Zheng, Jing Zhou, Peichen He, Xiaojia Zhan, Jingyu Xie, Rongdong Li, Rihui Li, Peihua Cao, Guozhi Huang
{"title":"桡侧体外冲击波疗法对中风后患者上肢屈肌痉挛的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Tao Fan, Rong Chen, Mingyang Wei, Xiangying Zhou, Peng Zheng, Jing Zhou, Peichen He, Xiaojia Zhan, Jingyu Xie, Rongdong Li, Rihui Li, Peihua Cao, Guozhi Huang","doi":"10.1177/02692155241258740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treating upper limb spasticity after a stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This study included 95 people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The active (<i>n</i> = 47) and sham-placebo (<i>n</i> = 48) radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy groups received three treatment sessions (every third day).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The Modified Ashworth Scale, Hmax/Mmax ratio, root mean square, co-contraction ratio, mechanical parameters of the muscle and temperature were measured at baseline and days 2, 5 and 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 135 potential participants screened, 100 were enrolled and allocated randomly, with 95 participants ultimately being included in the intent-to-treat analysis dataset. The active group showed significantly better improvements in upper limb spasticity and muscle function than did the sham-placebo group. Greater improvements in the Modified Ashworth Scale were observed in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.22; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Moreover, significant differences in root mean square, co-contraction ratio and Hmax/Mmax ratio were observed between the two groups (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). The mechanical parameters of the biceps muscle were significantly better in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The active group had a higher temperature than the sham-placebo group, although the difference was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.070).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the treatment with extracorporeal shockwave therapy can relieve upper limb spasticity in people with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1200-1213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on flexor spasticity of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tao Fan, Rong Chen, Mingyang Wei, Xiangying Zhou, Peng Zheng, Jing Zhou, Peichen He, Xiaojia Zhan, Jingyu Xie, Rongdong Li, Rihui Li, Peihua Cao, Guozhi Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241258740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treating upper limb spasticity after a stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This study included 95 people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The active (<i>n</i> = 47) and sham-placebo (<i>n</i> = 48) radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy groups received three treatment sessions (every third day).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The Modified Ashworth Scale, Hmax/Mmax ratio, root mean square, co-contraction ratio, mechanical parameters of the muscle and temperature were measured at baseline and days 2, 5 and 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 135 potential participants screened, 100 were enrolled and allocated randomly, with 95 participants ultimately being included in the intent-to-treat analysis dataset. The active group showed significantly better improvements in upper limb spasticity and muscle function than did the sham-placebo group. Greater improvements in the Modified Ashworth Scale were observed in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.22; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Moreover, significant differences in root mean square, co-contraction ratio and Hmax/Mmax ratio were observed between the two groups (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). The mechanical parameters of the biceps muscle were significantly better in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The active group had a higher temperature than the sham-placebo group, although the difference was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.070).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the treatment with extracorporeal shockwave therapy can relieve upper limb spasticity in people with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1200-1213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241258740\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241258740","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估桡动脉体外冲击波疗法治疗中风后上肢痉挛的疗效:本研究旨在评估桡动脉体外冲击波疗法治疗中风后上肢痉挛的疗效:随机对照试验:南方医科大学珠江医院:本研究纳入95名脑卒中患者:积极治疗组(47人)和假安慰剂组(48人)接受三次治疗(每三天一次):在基线和第 2、5 和 8 天测量修正阿什沃斯量表、Hmax/Mmax 比值、均方根、共收缩比值、肌肉机械参数和温度:在筛选出的 135 名潜在参与者中,有 100 人被随机录取和分配,最终有 95 人被纳入意向治疗分析数据集。积极组在上肢痉挛和肌肉功能方面的改善明显优于假安慰剂组。与假安慰剂组相比,积极治疗组在 "改良阿什沃斯量表"(Modified Ashworth Scale)方面的改善幅度更大(差异为-0.45;95% CI为-0.69至-0.22;P P P P = 0.070):本研究表明,体外冲击波疗法可以缓解脑卒中患者的上肢痉挛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on flexor spasticity of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treating upper limb spasticity after a stroke.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University.

Subjects: This study included 95 people with stroke.

Intervention: The active (n = 47) and sham-placebo (n = 48) radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy groups received three treatment sessions (every third day).

Main measures: The Modified Ashworth Scale, Hmax/Mmax ratio, root mean square, co-contraction ratio, mechanical parameters of the muscle and temperature were measured at baseline and days 2, 5 and 8.

Results: Among the 135 potential participants screened, 100 were enrolled and allocated randomly, with 95 participants ultimately being included in the intent-to-treat analysis dataset. The active group showed significantly better improvements in upper limb spasticity and muscle function than did the sham-placebo group. Greater improvements in the Modified Ashworth Scale were observed in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.22; P < 0.001). Moreover, significant differences in root mean square, co-contraction ratio and Hmax/Mmax ratio were observed between the two groups (all P < 0.001). The mechanical parameters of the biceps muscle were significantly better in the active group than in the sham-placebo group (P < 0.001). The active group had a higher temperature than the sham-placebo group, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.070).

Conclusions: This study revealed that the treatment with extracorporeal shockwave therapy can relieve upper limb spasticity in people with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Effects of Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire thresholds and gender on spatiotemporal parameters during walking in patients with chronic low back pain. Aquatic exercise interventions in the treatment of musculoskeletal upper extremity disorders: A scoping review. Coming to my own wisdom: A qualitative study exploring the role of the Take Charge intervention in stroke recovery. Effects of a home-based pelvic floor muscle training with and without action and cue observation on urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial. The 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-9) has adequate measurement properties in patients with chronic low back pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1