Ali Sadoughi, Shwe Synn, Christine Chan, David Schecter, Gabriel Hernandez Romero, Sahil Virdi, Abhishek Sarkar, Mimi Kim
{"title":"无需虚拟导航的超薄支气管镜诊断肺部周围病变。","authors":"Ali Sadoughi, Shwe Synn, Christine Chan, David Schecter, Gabriel Hernandez Romero, Sahil Virdi, Abhishek Sarkar, Mimi Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00408-024-00695-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing incidence of encountering lung nodules necessitates an ongoing search for improved diagnostic procedures. Various bronchoscopic technologies have been introduced or are in development, but further studies are needed to define a method that fits best in clinical practice and health care systems.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do basic bronchoscopic tools including a combination of thin (outer diameter 4.2 mm) and ultrathin bronchoscopes (outer diameter 3.0 mm), radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) and fluoroscopy perform in peripheral pulmonary lesion diagnosis?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of the performance of peripheral bronchoscopy using thin and ultrathin bronchoscopy with rEBUS and 2D fluoroscopy without a navigational system for evaluating peripheral lung lesions in a single academic medical center from 11/2015 to 1/2021. We used a strict definition for diagnostic yield and assessed the impact of different variables on diagnostic yield, specifically after employment of the ultrathin bronchoscope. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the independent associations of the most impactful variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 322 patients were included in this study. The median of the long axis diameter was 2.2 cm and the median distance of the center of the lesion from the visceral pleural surface was 1.9 cm. Overall diagnostic yield was 81.3% after employment of the ultrathin bronchoscope, with more detection of concentric rEBUS views (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity for detecting malignancy also increased from 60.5% to 74.7% (p = 0.033) after incorporating the ultrathin scope into practice, while bronchus sign and peripheral location of the lesion were not found to affect diagnostic yield. Concentric rEBUS view, solid appearance, upper/middle lobe location and larger size of the nodules were found to be independent predictors of successful achievement of diagnosis at bronchoscopy.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study demonstrates a high diagnostic yield of biopsy of lung lesions achieved by utilization of thin and ultrathin bronchoscopes. Direct visualization of small peripheral airways with simultaneous rEBUS confirmation increased localization rate of small lesions in a conventional bronchoscopy setting without virtual navigational planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":" ","pages":"601-613"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrathin Bronchoscopy Without Virtual Navigation for Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Sadoughi, Shwe Synn, Christine Chan, David Schecter, Gabriel Hernandez Romero, Sahil Virdi, Abhishek Sarkar, Mimi Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00408-024-00695-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing incidence of encountering lung nodules necessitates an ongoing search for improved diagnostic procedures. Various bronchoscopic technologies have been introduced or are in development, but further studies are needed to define a method that fits best in clinical practice and health care systems.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do basic bronchoscopic tools including a combination of thin (outer diameter 4.2 mm) and ultrathin bronchoscopes (outer diameter 3.0 mm), radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) and fluoroscopy perform in peripheral pulmonary lesion diagnosis?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of the performance of peripheral bronchoscopy using thin and ultrathin bronchoscopy with rEBUS and 2D fluoroscopy without a navigational system for evaluating peripheral lung lesions in a single academic medical center from 11/2015 to 1/2021. We used a strict definition for diagnostic yield and assessed the impact of different variables on diagnostic yield, specifically after employment of the ultrathin bronchoscope. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the independent associations of the most impactful variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 322 patients were included in this study. The median of the long axis diameter was 2.2 cm and the median distance of the center of the lesion from the visceral pleural surface was 1.9 cm. Overall diagnostic yield was 81.3% after employment of the ultrathin bronchoscope, with more detection of concentric rEBUS views (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity for detecting malignancy also increased from 60.5% to 74.7% (p = 0.033) after incorporating the ultrathin scope into practice, while bronchus sign and peripheral location of the lesion were not found to affect diagnostic yield. Concentric rEBUS view, solid appearance, upper/middle lobe location and larger size of the nodules were found to be independent predictors of successful achievement of diagnosis at bronchoscopy.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study demonstrates a high diagnostic yield of biopsy of lung lesions achieved by utilization of thin and ultrathin bronchoscopes. Direct visualization of small peripheral airways with simultaneous rEBUS confirmation increased localization rate of small lesions in a conventional bronchoscopy setting without virtual navigational planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"601-613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427480/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00695-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00695-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于肺部结节的发病率越来越高,因此有必要不断寻求更好的诊断方法。各种支气管镜技术已经推出或正在开发中,但还需要进一步研究,以确定最适合临床实践和医疗保健系统的方法:研究问题:包括细支气管镜(外径 4.2 毫米)和超细支气管镜(外径 3.0 毫米)、径向支气管内超声(rEBUS)和透视在内的基本支气管镜工具在外周肺部病变诊断中的表现如何?这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是 2015 年 11 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,在一家学术医疗中心使用细支气管镜、超细支气管镜和 rEBUS 以及不带导航系统的二维透视评估肺部外周病变的情况。我们对诊断率采用了严格的定义,并评估了不同变量对诊断率的影响,特别是在使用超细支气管镜后。我们采用逻辑回归模型来评估影响最大的变量之间的独立关联:本研究共纳入了 322 名患者。长轴直径的中位数为 2.2 厘米,病变中心与内脏胸膜表面距离的中位数为 1.9 厘米。使用超细支气管镜后,总体诊断率为 81.3%,其中同心圆 rEBUS 透视的检出率更高(93% 对 78%,P 解释:这项研究表明,使用细支气管镜和超细支气管镜对肺部病变进行活检的诊断率很高。在没有虚拟导航规划的传统支气管镜检查中,直接观察周边小气道并同时进行 rEBUS 确认可提高小病灶的定位率。
Ultrathin Bronchoscopy Without Virtual Navigation for Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Lesions.
Background: The increasing incidence of encountering lung nodules necessitates an ongoing search for improved diagnostic procedures. Various bronchoscopic technologies have been introduced or are in development, but further studies are needed to define a method that fits best in clinical practice and health care systems.
Research question: How do basic bronchoscopic tools including a combination of thin (outer diameter 4.2 mm) and ultrathin bronchoscopes (outer diameter 3.0 mm), radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) and fluoroscopy perform in peripheral pulmonary lesion diagnosis?
Study design and methods: This is a retrospective review of the performance of peripheral bronchoscopy using thin and ultrathin bronchoscopy with rEBUS and 2D fluoroscopy without a navigational system for evaluating peripheral lung lesions in a single academic medical center from 11/2015 to 1/2021. We used a strict definition for diagnostic yield and assessed the impact of different variables on diagnostic yield, specifically after employment of the ultrathin bronchoscope. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the independent associations of the most impactful variables.
Results: A total of 322 patients were included in this study. The median of the long axis diameter was 2.2 cm and the median distance of the center of the lesion from the visceral pleural surface was 1.9 cm. Overall diagnostic yield was 81.3% after employment of the ultrathin bronchoscope, with more detection of concentric rEBUS views (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity for detecting malignancy also increased from 60.5% to 74.7% (p = 0.033) after incorporating the ultrathin scope into practice, while bronchus sign and peripheral location of the lesion were not found to affect diagnostic yield. Concentric rEBUS view, solid appearance, upper/middle lobe location and larger size of the nodules were found to be independent predictors of successful achievement of diagnosis at bronchoscopy.
Interpretation: This study demonstrates a high diagnostic yield of biopsy of lung lesions achieved by utilization of thin and ultrathin bronchoscopes. Direct visualization of small peripheral airways with simultaneous rEBUS confirmation increased localization rate of small lesions in a conventional bronchoscopy setting without virtual navigational planning.
期刊介绍:
Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.