美国政府在线补充营养餐资源环境扫描。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1097/NMC.0000000000001033
Kelsey L Thompson, Michelle D Graf
{"title":"美国政府在线补充营养餐资源环境扫描。","authors":"Kelsey L Thompson, Michelle D Graf","doi":"10.1097/NMC.0000000000001033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parents commonly seek online sources of information on the important complementary feeding period, but the accuracy of these sources varies. The 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA) states federal government resources should be accurate and user-friendly; however, the quantity, quality, and accuracy of federal resources on complementary feeding is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An environmental scan of online federal, parent-facing resources about complementary feeding was conducted. The authors reviewed federal resources for concordance of information with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA). Quality was evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 resources across 2 federal government departments. Overall quality was high as was concordance with recommendations from the DGA for age of complementary food introduction, foods to introduce, and foods to avoid. Allergenic food introduction and textured food progression recommendations were less consistent. Recommendations for improvements to federal resources are made.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This environmental scan only included federal resources for CF. Parents may be accessing other, non-federal resources online. However, given the enactment of IDEA, it is expected that these federal resources will be up-to-date and user-friendly, which was not always the case. Nurses should review the DGA guidelines for complementary feeding and provide evidence-based anticipatory guidance to families, focusing especially on allergenic food introduction and textured food progression. Future complementary feeding interventions may benefit from directing families to online exemplars from federal sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":51121,"journal":{"name":"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Scan of Online Government Complementary Feeding Resources in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey L Thompson, Michelle D Graf\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NMC.0000000000001033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parents commonly seek online sources of information on the important complementary feeding period, but the accuracy of these sources varies. The 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA) states federal government resources should be accurate and user-friendly; however, the quantity, quality, and accuracy of federal resources on complementary feeding is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An environmental scan of online federal, parent-facing resources about complementary feeding was conducted. The authors reviewed federal resources for concordance of information with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA). Quality was evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 resources across 2 federal government departments. Overall quality was high as was concordance with recommendations from the DGA for age of complementary food introduction, foods to introduce, and foods to avoid. Allergenic food introduction and textured food progression recommendations were less consistent. Recommendations for improvements to federal resources are made.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This environmental scan only included federal resources for CF. Parents may be accessing other, non-federal resources online. However, given the enactment of IDEA, it is expected that these federal resources will be up-to-date and user-friendly, which was not always the case. Nurses should review the DGA guidelines for complementary feeding and provide evidence-based anticipatory guidance to families, focusing especially on allergenic food introduction and textured food progression. Future complementary feeding interventions may benefit from directing families to online exemplars from federal sources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000001033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000001033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家长们通常会在网上寻找有关重要辅食添加时期的信息,但这些信息的准确性却参差不齐。21 世纪综合数字体验法案》(21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act,IDEA)规定,联邦政府资源应准确且方便用户使用;然而,有关辅食喂养的联邦资源的数量、质量和准确性尚不清楚:方法:作者对面向家长的辅食在线联邦资源进行了环境扫描。作者审查了联邦资源中与《美国膳食指南》(DGA)一致的信息。结果:两个联邦政府部门共提供了 112 份资料。总体质量较高,与《美国膳食指南》中关于添加辅食的年龄、应添加的食物和应避免添加的食物的建议的一致性也较高。过敏性食物的引入和有纹理食物的添加建议则不太一致。对联邦资源提出了改进建议:本次环境扫描仅包括针对 CF 的联邦资源。家长可能会在网上获取其他非联邦资源。然而,鉴于 IDEA 的颁布,这些联邦资源有望成为最新的用户友好型资源,但情况并非总是如此。护士应复习 DGA 的辅食添加指南,并为家庭提供基于证据的预期指导,尤其要关注过敏原食物的引入和质地食物的添加。未来的辅食喂养干预措施可能会受益于引导家庭使用联邦来源的在线范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental Scan of Online Government Complementary Feeding Resources in the United States.

Background: Parents commonly seek online sources of information on the important complementary feeding period, but the accuracy of these sources varies. The 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA) states federal government resources should be accurate and user-friendly; however, the quantity, quality, and accuracy of federal resources on complementary feeding is unknown.

Methods: An environmental scan of online federal, parent-facing resources about complementary feeding was conducted. The authors reviewed federal resources for concordance of information with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA). Quality was evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool.

Results: A total of 112 resources across 2 federal government departments. Overall quality was high as was concordance with recommendations from the DGA for age of complementary food introduction, foods to introduce, and foods to avoid. Allergenic food introduction and textured food progression recommendations were less consistent. Recommendations for improvements to federal resources are made.

Clinical implications: This environmental scan only included federal resources for CF. Parents may be accessing other, non-federal resources online. However, given the enactment of IDEA, it is expected that these federal resources will be up-to-date and user-friendly, which was not always the case. Nurses should review the DGA guidelines for complementary feeding and provide evidence-based anticipatory guidance to families, focusing especially on allergenic food introduction and textured food progression. Future complementary feeding interventions may benefit from directing families to online exemplars from federal sources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MCN''s mission is to provide the most timely, relevant information to nurses practicing in perinatal, neonatal, midwifery, and pediatric specialties. MCN is a peer-reviewed journal that meets its mission by publishing clinically relevant practice and research manuscripts aimed at assisting nurses toward evidence-based practice. MCN focuses on today''s major issues and high priority problems in maternal/child nursing, women''s health, and family nursing with extensive coverage of advanced practice healthcare issues relating to infants and young children. Each issue features peer-reviewed, clinically relevant articles. Coverage includes updates on disease and related care; ideas on health promotion; insights into patient and family behavior; discoveries in physiology and pathophysiology; clinical investigations; and research manuscripts that assist nurses toward evidence-based practices.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Rural Access to Prenatal Care in the United States by Patients, Nurses, Midwives, and Physicians: An Integrative Review. Concept Analysis of Woman-Centered Care: Implications for Postpartum Care. African Immigrant Women's Experiences of Maternity Care in the United States. Gastrointestinal and Gastroesophageal Reflux Scale Reference Values. Standardizing Fetal Movement Monitoring using Count the Kicks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1