护理学中领导者谦虚领导、参与者心理安全、团队知识共享和追随者创造力的水平和预测因素:横断面在线调查

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1155/2024/9660787
Majd T. Mrayyan, Saleem F. Al-Rjoub
{"title":"护理学中领导者谦虚领导、参与者心理安全、团队知识共享和追随者创造力的水平和预测因素:横断面在线调查","authors":"Majd T. Mrayyan,&nbsp;Saleem F. Al-Rjoub","doi":"10.1155/2024/9660787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Aim</i>. The current study investigated the levels and predictors of leaders’ humble leadership, participants’ psychological safety, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. <i>Background</i>. Humble leadership, psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and followers’ creativity are non-nursing research fields, and humble leadership has recently been examined in nursing. <i>Methods</i>. A cross-sectional research design was employed via an online survey. A nonprobability convenience snowball sample of 245 nursing academics (<i>n</i> = 85, 34.70%), nurses (<i>n</i> = 140, 57.10%), and nursing leaders (<i>n</i> = 20, 8.20%) was recruited from three universities and three hospitals. <i>Results</i>. The participants rated “high” the leaders’ humble leadership, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. However, participants’ psychological safety was precarious. The four variables’ predictors were assessed based on the sample’s characteristics. Leaders’ humble leadership did not predict participants’ psychological safety; the sole predictor of the variable was the organization’s quality initiatives. The predictors of knowledge sharing in the team were leaders’ humble leadership, age, level of education, and accreditation initiatives in the organizations. The predictors of followers’ creativity were leaders’ humble leadership, level of education, and quality initiatives in the organizations. The lowest means of the four variables should be immediately managed. <i>Conclusion</i>. Quality initiatives in organizations and the number of tenures were the most influential predictors of the four variables evaluated. Leaders’ humble leadership predicted knowledge sharing in the team and followers’ creativity, but not participants’ psychological safety. As followers’ psychological safety contributes to trustful relationships within the team, workplace boundaries and conducive work environments should be promoted. Training programs are required to develop humble nurses and leaders’ leadership.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/9660787","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levels and Predictors of Leaders’ Humble Leadership, Participants’ Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing in the Team, and Followers’ Creativity in Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey\",\"authors\":\"Majd T. Mrayyan,&nbsp;Saleem F. Al-Rjoub\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/9660787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Aim</i>. The current study investigated the levels and predictors of leaders’ humble leadership, participants’ psychological safety, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. <i>Background</i>. Humble leadership, psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and followers’ creativity are non-nursing research fields, and humble leadership has recently been examined in nursing. <i>Methods</i>. A cross-sectional research design was employed via an online survey. A nonprobability convenience snowball sample of 245 nursing academics (<i>n</i> = 85, 34.70%), nurses (<i>n</i> = 140, 57.10%), and nursing leaders (<i>n</i> = 20, 8.20%) was recruited from three universities and three hospitals. <i>Results</i>. The participants rated “high” the leaders’ humble leadership, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. However, participants’ psychological safety was precarious. The four variables’ predictors were assessed based on the sample’s characteristics. Leaders’ humble leadership did not predict participants’ psychological safety; the sole predictor of the variable was the organization’s quality initiatives. The predictors of knowledge sharing in the team were leaders’ humble leadership, age, level of education, and accreditation initiatives in the organizations. The predictors of followers’ creativity were leaders’ humble leadership, level of education, and quality initiatives in the organizations. The lowest means of the four variables should be immediately managed. <i>Conclusion</i>. Quality initiatives in organizations and the number of tenures were the most influential predictors of the four variables evaluated. Leaders’ humble leadership predicted knowledge sharing in the team and followers’ creativity, but not participants’ psychological safety. As followers’ psychological safety contributes to trustful relationships within the team, workplace boundaries and conducive work environments should be promoted. Training programs are required to develop humble nurses and leaders’ leadership.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/9660787\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9660787\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9660787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究调查了护理工作中领导者谦逊领导、参与者心理安全、团队知识共享和追随者创造力的水平和预测因素。研究背景谦逊领导、心理安全、知识共享和追随者的创造力是非护理研究领域,而谦逊领导最近才在护理领域得到研究。研究方法通过在线调查采用横断面研究设计。从三所大学和三家医院招募了 245 名护理学者(n = 85,占 34.70%)、护士(n = 140,占 57.10%)和护理领导(n = 20,占 8.20%)作为非概率方便滚雪球样本。结果显示受试者对领导者的谦虚领导、团队知识共享和追随者的护理创造力给予了 "高 "评价。但是,参与者的心理安全感不稳定。根据样本特征对四个变量的预测因素进行了评估。领导者的谦虚领导并不能预测参与者的心理安全,唯一能预测该变量的是组织的质量举措。团队中知识共享的预测因子是领导者的谦逊领导、年龄、教育水平和组织的认证措施。追随者创造力的预测因素是领导者的谦虚领导、教育水平和组织的质量举措。应立即对这四个变量中平均值最低的变量进行管理。结论在评估的四个变量中,组织中的质量举措和任职次数是最有影响力的预测因素。领导者的谦虚领导可以预测团队中的知识共享和追随者的创造力,但不能预测参与者的心理安全。由于追随者的心理安全有助于团队内部的信任关系,因此应促进工作场所的界限和有利的工作环境。需要开展培训计划来培养谦逊的护士和领导者的领导力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Levels and Predictors of Leaders’ Humble Leadership, Participants’ Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing in the Team, and Followers’ Creativity in Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey

Aim. The current study investigated the levels and predictors of leaders’ humble leadership, participants’ psychological safety, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. Background. Humble leadership, psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and followers’ creativity are non-nursing research fields, and humble leadership has recently been examined in nursing. Methods. A cross-sectional research design was employed via an online survey. A nonprobability convenience snowball sample of 245 nursing academics (n = 85, 34.70%), nurses (n = 140, 57.10%), and nursing leaders (n = 20, 8.20%) was recruited from three universities and three hospitals. Results. The participants rated “high” the leaders’ humble leadership, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. However, participants’ psychological safety was precarious. The four variables’ predictors were assessed based on the sample’s characteristics. Leaders’ humble leadership did not predict participants’ psychological safety; the sole predictor of the variable was the organization’s quality initiatives. The predictors of knowledge sharing in the team were leaders’ humble leadership, age, level of education, and accreditation initiatives in the organizations. The predictors of followers’ creativity were leaders’ humble leadership, level of education, and quality initiatives in the organizations. The lowest means of the four variables should be immediately managed. Conclusion. Quality initiatives in organizations and the number of tenures were the most influential predictors of the four variables evaluated. Leaders’ humble leadership predicted knowledge sharing in the team and followers’ creativity, but not participants’ psychological safety. As followers’ psychological safety contributes to trustful relationships within the team, workplace boundaries and conducive work environments should be promoted. Training programs are required to develop humble nurses and leaders’ leadership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review Challenges in Clinical Training for Nursing Students during COVID-19: Examining Its Effects on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction A Concept Analysis of Change Fatigue Among Nurses Based on Walker and Avant’s Method The Effect of Digital Competence on Nurses’ Career Sustainability: A Cross-Sectional Study Effects of Hierarchical Unit Culture and Power Distance Orientation on Nurses’ Silence Behavior: The Roles of Perceived Futility and Hospital Management Support for Patient Safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1