{"title":"护理学中领导者谦虚领导、参与者心理安全、团队知识共享和追随者创造力的水平和预测因素:横断面在线调查","authors":"Majd T. Mrayyan, Saleem F. Al-Rjoub","doi":"10.1155/2024/9660787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Aim</i>. The current study investigated the levels and predictors of leaders’ humble leadership, participants’ psychological safety, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. <i>Background</i>. Humble leadership, psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and followers’ creativity are non-nursing research fields, and humble leadership has recently been examined in nursing. <i>Methods</i>. A cross-sectional research design was employed via an online survey. A nonprobability convenience snowball sample of 245 nursing academics (<i>n</i> = 85, 34.70%), nurses (<i>n</i> = 140, 57.10%), and nursing leaders (<i>n</i> = 20, 8.20%) was recruited from three universities and three hospitals. <i>Results</i>. The participants rated “high” the leaders’ humble leadership, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. However, participants’ psychological safety was precarious. The four variables’ predictors were assessed based on the sample’s characteristics. Leaders’ humble leadership did not predict participants’ psychological safety; the sole predictor of the variable was the organization’s quality initiatives. The predictors of knowledge sharing in the team were leaders’ humble leadership, age, level of education, and accreditation initiatives in the organizations. The predictors of followers’ creativity were leaders’ humble leadership, level of education, and quality initiatives in the organizations. The lowest means of the four variables should be immediately managed. <i>Conclusion</i>. Quality initiatives in organizations and the number of tenures were the most influential predictors of the four variables evaluated. Leaders’ humble leadership predicted knowledge sharing in the team and followers’ creativity, but not participants’ psychological safety. As followers’ psychological safety contributes to trustful relationships within the team, workplace boundaries and conducive work environments should be promoted. Training programs are required to develop humble nurses and leaders’ leadership.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/9660787","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levels and Predictors of Leaders’ Humble Leadership, Participants’ Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing in the Team, and Followers’ Creativity in Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey\",\"authors\":\"Majd T. Mrayyan, Saleem F. Al-Rjoub\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/9660787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Aim</i>. The current study investigated the levels and predictors of leaders’ humble leadership, participants’ psychological safety, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. <i>Background</i>. Humble leadership, psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and followers’ creativity are non-nursing research fields, and humble leadership has recently been examined in nursing. <i>Methods</i>. A cross-sectional research design was employed via an online survey. A nonprobability convenience snowball sample of 245 nursing academics (<i>n</i> = 85, 34.70%), nurses (<i>n</i> = 140, 57.10%), and nursing leaders (<i>n</i> = 20, 8.20%) was recruited from three universities and three hospitals. <i>Results</i>. The participants rated “high” the leaders’ humble leadership, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. However, participants’ psychological safety was precarious. The four variables’ predictors were assessed based on the sample’s characteristics. Leaders’ humble leadership did not predict participants’ psychological safety; the sole predictor of the variable was the organization’s quality initiatives. The predictors of knowledge sharing in the team were leaders’ humble leadership, age, level of education, and accreditation initiatives in the organizations. The predictors of followers’ creativity were leaders’ humble leadership, level of education, and quality initiatives in the organizations. The lowest means of the four variables should be immediately managed. <i>Conclusion</i>. Quality initiatives in organizations and the number of tenures were the most influential predictors of the four variables evaluated. Leaders’ humble leadership predicted knowledge sharing in the team and followers’ creativity, but not participants’ psychological safety. As followers’ psychological safety contributes to trustful relationships within the team, workplace boundaries and conducive work environments should be promoted. Training programs are required to develop humble nurses and leaders’ leadership.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/9660787\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9660787\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9660787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Levels and Predictors of Leaders’ Humble Leadership, Participants’ Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing in the Team, and Followers’ Creativity in Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey
Aim. The current study investigated the levels and predictors of leaders’ humble leadership, participants’ psychological safety, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. Background. Humble leadership, psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and followers’ creativity are non-nursing research fields, and humble leadership has recently been examined in nursing. Methods. A cross-sectional research design was employed via an online survey. A nonprobability convenience snowball sample of 245 nursing academics (n = 85, 34.70%), nurses (n = 140, 57.10%), and nursing leaders (n = 20, 8.20%) was recruited from three universities and three hospitals. Results. The participants rated “high” the leaders’ humble leadership, knowledge sharing in the team, and followers’ creativity in nursing. However, participants’ psychological safety was precarious. The four variables’ predictors were assessed based on the sample’s characteristics. Leaders’ humble leadership did not predict participants’ psychological safety; the sole predictor of the variable was the organization’s quality initiatives. The predictors of knowledge sharing in the team were leaders’ humble leadership, age, level of education, and accreditation initiatives in the organizations. The predictors of followers’ creativity were leaders’ humble leadership, level of education, and quality initiatives in the organizations. The lowest means of the four variables should be immediately managed. Conclusion. Quality initiatives in organizations and the number of tenures were the most influential predictors of the four variables evaluated. Leaders’ humble leadership predicted knowledge sharing in the team and followers’ creativity, but not participants’ psychological safety. As followers’ psychological safety contributes to trustful relationships within the team, workplace boundaries and conducive work environments should be promoted. Training programs are required to develop humble nurses and leaders’ leadership.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses.
The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide.
The Journal of Nursing Management aims to:
-Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership
-Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership
-Assess the evidence for current practice
-Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership
-Examine the impact of policy developments
-Address issues in governance, quality and safety