膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎患者的数字化自我管理、镇痛剂使用和患者报告结果。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.033
Armaghan Mahmoudian, L Stefan Lohmander, Leif E Dahlberg, Ali Kiadaliri
{"title":"膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎患者的数字化自我管理、镇痛剂使用和患者报告结果。","authors":"Armaghan Mahmoudian, L Stefan Lohmander, Leif E Dahlberg, Ali Kiadaliri","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate changes in analgesic use before and after participation in a digital first-line treatment program (exercise, patient education) in persons with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) and to explore associations between these changes in medication use and participant-reported pain and function.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study with pre-post measures.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community setting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals (N=4100; mean age ± SD, 64.5±9.3y; 73.3% women) participating in the digital program.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A digital supervised education and exercise therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Self-reported analgesic use for knee/hip pain during the past month at baseline and 12-week follow-up, knee/hip numeric rating scale pain (0-10, a higher value indicating more pain), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 or Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 function subscale (0-100, higher values indicating better function). McNemar test, multivariable logistic regression, and linear random intercept model were used for statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants, 61.4% and 49.4% were analgesic users at baseline and 12-week follow-up, respectively, (absolute reduction 12.0%; 95% confidence interval, 10.5-13.5). Being female, having hip OA, lower education, higher body mass index, living outside large metropolitan cities, coexisting rheumatoid arthritis, and walking difficulties were associated with higher odds of analgesic use at baseline. At both time points, persons not using analgesics at the time reported better outcomes. All groups but \"new users\" experienced improvements in their pain and function following participation in digital program with the greatest improvements observed among \"quitters.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engaging in a digital exercise and patient education program as a primary treatment for knee or hip OA was associated with a reduction in the use of analgesics. The greatest improvements were seen for those who stopped analgesic use. These results highlight the importance of providing effective first-line treatment to people with knee or hip OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Self-management, Analgesic Use, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Armaghan Mahmoudian, L Stefan Lohmander, Leif E Dahlberg, Ali Kiadaliri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate changes in analgesic use before and after participation in a digital first-line treatment program (exercise, patient education) in persons with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) and to explore associations between these changes in medication use and participant-reported pain and function.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study with pre-post measures.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community setting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals (N=4100; mean age ± SD, 64.5±9.3y; 73.3% women) participating in the digital program.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A digital supervised education and exercise therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Self-reported analgesic use for knee/hip pain during the past month at baseline and 12-week follow-up, knee/hip numeric rating scale pain (0-10, a higher value indicating more pain), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 or Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 function subscale (0-100, higher values indicating better function). McNemar test, multivariable logistic regression, and linear random intercept model were used for statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants, 61.4% and 49.4% were analgesic users at baseline and 12-week follow-up, respectively, (absolute reduction 12.0%; 95% confidence interval, 10.5-13.5). Being female, having hip OA, lower education, higher body mass index, living outside large metropolitan cities, coexisting rheumatoid arthritis, and walking difficulties were associated with higher odds of analgesic use at baseline. At both time points, persons not using analgesics at the time reported better outcomes. All groups but \\\"new users\\\" experienced improvements in their pain and function following participation in digital program with the greatest improvements observed among \\\"quitters.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engaging in a digital exercise and patient education program as a primary treatment for knee or hip OA was associated with a reduction in the use of analgesics. The greatest improvements were seen for those who stopped analgesic use. These results highlight the importance of providing effective first-line treatment to people with knee or hip OA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查膝关节或髋关节 OA 患者在参与数字化一线治疗计划(运动和患者教育)前后镇痛药使用的变化,并探讨这些药物使用变化与参与者报告的疼痛和功能之间的关联:环境:瑞典社区环境:地点:瑞典社区:参与数字化项目的个人(n=4100,平均 [SD] 年龄为 64.5 [9.3],73.3% 为女性):干预措施:数字化监督教育和运动疗法:主要结果测量指标:基线和 12 周随访时自我报告的过去一个月膝关节/髋关节疼痛的止痛药使用情况、膝关节/髋关节 NRS 疼痛(0-10,数值越高表示疼痛越重)、KOOS-12 或 HOOS-12 功能分量表(0-100,数值越高表示功能越好)。统计分析采用 McNemar 检验、多变量逻辑回归和线性随机截距模型:在基线和随访 12 周时,分别有 61.4% 和 49.4% 的参与者使用镇痛药(绝对减少率为 12.0%,95%CI 为 10.5,13.5)。女性、患有髋关节OA、教育程度较低、体重指数较高、居住在大都市以外、同时患有类风湿性关节炎以及行走困难与基线时使用镇痛剂的几率较高有关。在这两个时间点上,当时未使用镇痛药的人都有更好的疗效。除 "新用户 "外,所有群体在参与数字项目后疼痛和功能都有所改善,其中 "戒烟者 "的改善幅度最大:结论:作为膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎的主要治疗方法,参与数字运动和患者教育计划与减少镇痛药的使用有关。停止使用镇痛药的患者的情况改善最大。这些结果凸显了为膝关节或髋关节OA患者提供有效一线治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital Self-management, Analgesic Use, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis.

Objective: To investigate changes in analgesic use before and after participation in a digital first-line treatment program (exercise, patient education) in persons with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) and to explore associations between these changes in medication use and participant-reported pain and function.

Design: Retrospective cohort study with pre-post measures.

Setting: Community setting.

Participants: Individuals (N=4100; mean age ± SD, 64.5±9.3y; 73.3% women) participating in the digital program.

Interventions: A digital supervised education and exercise therapy.

Main outcome measures: Self-reported analgesic use for knee/hip pain during the past month at baseline and 12-week follow-up, knee/hip numeric rating scale pain (0-10, a higher value indicating more pain), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 or Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 function subscale (0-100, higher values indicating better function). McNemar test, multivariable logistic regression, and linear random intercept model were used for statistical analyses.

Results: Among participants, 61.4% and 49.4% were analgesic users at baseline and 12-week follow-up, respectively, (absolute reduction 12.0%; 95% confidence interval, 10.5-13.5). Being female, having hip OA, lower education, higher body mass index, living outside large metropolitan cities, coexisting rheumatoid arthritis, and walking difficulties were associated with higher odds of analgesic use at baseline. At both time points, persons not using analgesics at the time reported better outcomes. All groups but "new users" experienced improvements in their pain and function following participation in digital program with the greatest improvements observed among "quitters."

Conclusions: Engaging in a digital exercise and patient education program as a primary treatment for knee or hip OA was associated with a reduction in the use of analgesics. The greatest improvements were seen for those who stopped analgesic use. These results highlight the importance of providing effective first-line treatment to people with knee or hip OA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
What Do I Need to Know About Long COVID-related Breathing Problems? Self-management Programs Within Rehabilitation Yield Positive Health Outcomes at a Small Increased Cost Compared With Usual Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Relations Between Self-reported Prescription Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, and Tramadol Use and Unintentional Injuries Among Those With Spinal Cord Injury. Home-Based Balance Training on Balance and Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Construct Validity and Responsiveness of Performance-based Tests in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1